The Sunic Journal: Interview with Richard Bertrand Spencer
March 2, 2010 · Print This Article
Tom interviews accomplished writer and thinker Richard Bertrand Spencer, former managing editor of TakiMag, founder & executive editor of soon-to-be launched Web site The Alternative Right.
- The meaning of the term “Alternative Right.”
- The Alternative Right’s opposition to mainstream conservatives, the Republican Party, and the Neoconservative warfare-statists.
- The need for a total dissolution of the culturally destructive “therapeutic welfare state.”
- The need to promoting “paleo-masculinity” and confront the mass feminization of men in the postmodern world
- The Tea Parties, their glaring implicit whiteness, and their co-option and corruption by the Republican Party.
- The decline of the media gatekeepers and how the Alternative Right will “push the boundaries of discourse.”
About Richard Spencer
To learn more about Richard Spencer and his new project check out the Alternative Right website. You can also see Richard’s work with The HL Mencken Club here and read his perceptive TakiMag essays here.
13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.
Contact Tom:
tom.sunic
hotmail.com
Tom,
Great interview. I wish all the best to the Alternative Right intellectual project. Though I wish you had asked Spencer a personal question regarding his relationship with Nina Kouprianova. Apparently Kouprianova is his girlfriend, and she supposedly has non-trivial Tatar ancestry. If this is the case, then Spencer’s race-mixing tendencies might explain his reluctance on WN and the JQ.
Marshall, I doubt it is as complicated as that. He probably wants to make a career as a “conservative” writer and is well aware that telling the truth about the jews will kill his putative career stone cold.
Is Spencer going to allow comments at his new site or will he shut them down the wa they did at TakiMag?
Do people who write comments actually listen to these shows? Do people who actually listen ever write comments? At times I have to wonder.
Re: “maybe Spencer isn’t a brain-dead xenophobic neanderthal like you ”
So “brain-dead xenophobic Neanderthal” means anybody who doesn’t kowtow to the Jew World Order? Okay.
We need to stop pussyfooting around the issue of Western decay.
We cannot blame Jews or other ethnic groups for this. It’s our homegrown problem.
We have too many gullible idiots and parasitic manipulators from our own people. Others just took advantage of them.
And what is it that distinguishes the West, especially over the past century?
Jewish power and dominance, especially in the media, law, and banking.
Re: “…the issue of Western decay. We cannot blame Jews…”
Okay, then where is this decay? Some examples, please.
It;s easy to see where Brett Stephens is coming from, when you see how he laughs at the following:
“A Catholic priest claimed that Superman “seems to personify the primitive religion expounded by Nietzsche’s Zarathustra’’ and said comics were a dangerous distraction from Christianity.”
http://www.amerika.org/2010/organization/new-boss-same-as-the-old-boss/
Stephens thinks this is hilarious. The idea that an ostensibly Christian country has a culture dominated by Christ-Killers is a big joke to Stephens.
X-Men: Jewish
Fantastic Four: Jewish
Batman: Jewish
Superman: Jewish
Spiderman: Jewish
Etc.
Just like TV.
Law & Order: Jewish
CSI: Jewish
NCIS: Jewish
Friends: Jewish
Seinfeld: Jewish
CNN: Jewish (+ Wolf Blitzer, Larry King, Aaron Brown, Campbell Brown: Jews)
CBS: Jewish
NBC: Jewish
ABC: Jewish
MTV: Jewish
Disney: Jewish
Etc.
This is the essence of both the Protocols and Talmudism. 1-2% of the population setting the “news” agenda, setting the parameters of debate, telling people how to think about sex and war and God and politics and the law and culture, deciding what people watch and listen to and read, hiring ’stars’ creating celebrities, agents for the talking heads and dream-makers and stars, lawyers for virtually every media figure, directing producing and writing in over half of the influential media, running the porn industry, etc.
And then some fool tries to say that Jews have nothing to do with cultural and societal rot?
I can say I’ve listened to the interview and read the comments.
One criticism I have that nags me: I always have trouble with the word ‘alternative’. It sounds like one is presenting something inferior to the real Right or trying to illegitimately hijack the meaning of the term. IMO The ‘True Right’ or something similar would have captured the meaning and sent a powerful message. ‘Alternative right’ reminds me of the term ‘alternative lifestyle’ and you know what that entails.
To suggest that there is an “Alternative Right” is to suggest that there is more than one right. Either it is the Right or it is the Left. There is no alternative. What this title states is that the Right has been fractured by opposing ideologies and therefore is constituted of several branches, and now we can have an alternative.
Bullshit!
When I put on my shoes, there is the left one and the right one. There is no alternative. A simplistic analogy? Perhaps. Now, you go figure.
Edwin R’s post was not visible when I posted mine. I certainly cannot disagree with his observations.
Hmm… I viewed Mr. Spencer’s website. I sense a potentially decadent, Babylonian gloss. Hence, an eventual mudslide into a deep brook.