Peter Schaenk Announcement

April 1, 2009 · Print This Article

We regret to announce that Peter Schaenk and Voice of Reason Broadcast Network have reached an agreement to part ways.

You can contact Peter at shanktalk@yahoo.com or his War of Perception Web site.

We are grateful for the months of hard work and professionalism that Peter has contributed to VoR, in an effort to get us off the ground in our first year. We wish him the very best of luck and success in all future endeavors.  The archives of Peter’s VoR broadcasts can be found here.

Comments

23 Responses to “Peter Schaenk Announcement”

  1. chome on April 1st, 2009 7:00 pm

    This is a joke right?

  2. Mike Conner on April 1st, 2009 7:09 pm

    It’s not a joke.

  3. New America on April 1st, 2009 7:53 pm

    If this is NOT a joke, as in “April Fools!,” then we are in trouble.

    A basic theme I expected of VOR was excellence, in a very meritocratic meaning of the term.

    Look at the “Listener Comments” thread for March, and see how it is clouded with the junior high school cafeteria comments of Reck Less: Abandon.

    There they remain.

    People judge you by who you choose – repeat – choose – to surround yourself with.

    When you looked at Susie’s post, “How the heck are we Americans…” 28 mar 09,) which was little more than a commercial for a GCN show, a GCN show host, and his business of selling seeds, I thought that this was an April Fool’s joke that took place a little early.

    And yet, there it remains, mute testimony to what VOR, at least in part, has become.

    I’ve sent money to VOR, and will continue to do so, in the hopes that this is the exception, and not the rule.

    VOR has a simple choice – either it goes directly for a “Take No Prisoners” intellectual and Racial perspective, or we will become simply another Patriotard network, complete with the latest conspiracy theories that reduce us, one and all, to continued subpotence -and, to quote Alex Linder, “that’s the moderate perspective.”

    Remember the point that Emma Peters casually mentioned, which is of much greater importance than has been discussed:

    RACE has a VERTICAL component.

    VOR should only aim at the top 1%, the people who actually make a real difference, guys like Bob in DC, and Emma Peters. (My comments concerning Emma Peters are listed under the thread of her show on The Patriot Dames 26 mar 09.

    I hope this event with Peter will force one and all to recognize the importance of what Dietrich said (paraphrasing):

    “This is the greatest battle of all time, and this is the most glorious time to be alive. Everything you do will affect the world your grandchildren, and their grandchildren, will live in. If you want it to be a brighter, better world, join us.”

    If “us” means GCN, et. al., then such energy as we produce will be neutralized, and grounded, and turned into energy for our Racial Enemies.

    That Suzie’s post, little more than an advertisement for a GCN show, a GCN host, and his seed business – remains up there – with her support of the Masonic Lodge, and with her silence on the meaning of the red fez the Masons wear – really are actions that speak louder than words.

  4. Jon Walker on April 1st, 2009 7:54 pm

    Well that is too bad. I certainly did not agree with Peter on a plethora of things and eventually tuned him out altogether. But it is too bad to see him go. He was a very knowledgable fellow and shared a great deal of excellent material with the listeners.

  5. Jon Walker on April 1st, 2009 7:57 pm

    So they have one freaking GCN article and you nuts freak out. Grow the hell up. Or better yet, why don’t you post something worth a shit.

  6. Drew on April 1st, 2009 7:59 pm

    Peter leaves on April Fools Day? You can’t be serious. Say it ain’t so.

  7. K-Sensor on April 1st, 2009 8:40 pm

    Just when I thought VoR was break through with its own persona and place.

    Hmmm anyone know why? Was there a disagreement to the types of content on the shows?

    Peter where’s your sticking power? You put down the likes of Rick Adams and even Alex Jones who I agree is working for others, but least they have the staying power to keep their shows up.

    If it’s a case of no time then I wish you luck. Maybe broadcasting wasn’t your thing, your hobby, you know what I mean… Cheers.

  8. New America on April 1st, 2009 9:18 pm

    in reply to K-Sensor:

    I can’t speak for Peter, but I can make an observation:

    you wrote:

    Peter where’s your sticking power? You put down the likes of Rick Adams and even Alex Jones who I agree is working for others, but least they have the staying power to keep their shows up.

    in reply:
    K-Sensor, it’s pretty easy.

    There’s nothing of substance to their shows.

    Adams is a useful idiot, who works for a network that helps keep the old Patriotards safely out in the field, grazing quietly, even as the wolves begin to gather.

    Jones attracts a younger audience, that is no less fooled.

    What the two demographics have in common is simple:

    People who are afraid, have limited resources, limited futures, and a dire need to feel superior to SOMEONE.

    By playing off the need of the impotent to feel powerful. their audience feels like they KNOW “What IS REALLY Going On.”

    And, while being continually praised as being “True PATRIOTS,” and “True Patriotic Americans,” they feel like they are a little bit better than the fellow next door.

    I recall on show on RBN where the listener called in and complained that he could not afford the electricity to run the fan that he used to cool the radio.

    I figure that comes to, at most, a dollar a month.

    My thesis is that formerly “Patriot” stations – mostly on shortwave – became, following Waco, Patriotard broadcasters, and suddenly kept talking about endless, increasingly nebulous conspiracies, all the while avoiding the ONE thing the Militia broadcasters got right:

    The organized, and then they were organizing politically,

    So, I see the Patriotard broadcasters, all of which seem to be in endless need of money, all of which are always on the verge of going off the air, and all of which, remarkably, stay on the air, as being almost like a “lightning rod” used to insure that White CLASS dissent remains diffused, vague, helpless, and a source of endless amusement for the Eddie Bernays types who would do just what I have suggested, for exactly the reasons I just stated.

  9. Peter Schaenk on April 1st, 2009 10:12 pm
  10. Decebal on April 1st, 2009 10:26 pm

    This would be a great loss for VOR.
    Peter is the only professional broadcaster, with a unique personality and a powerful insight. Maybe abrasive at times, but a great talent, with a unique perspective. I found myself in disagreement with some of his views and attitudes, without ever loosing respect for the man and his contributions.
    Let’s hope he will be back, proving he’s not a quitter.
    Let us all be greatful for his passionate programs.

  11. Anonymous on April 1st, 2009 10:40 pm

    Woah, this is a shock.

    Peter is indeed a professional broadcaster and was a great asset to the VOR franchise.

    On the Patriot Dames affair I chimed in a few times. On hindsight I think it would have been better if I did not – respecting the authority of the Program Director, to execute decisions as he sees fit.

    There can be at times an anti-Christian bias, yes; but it is not significant enough to be a major concern, IMO. There’s a spectrum of pro- and anti-Christianity that is anti-JWO.

    One’s position on Christianity either way doesn’t preclude them from being an effective opponent of the Jew World Order.

    Fortunately VOR has given the varying shades of that anti-JWO spectrum an airing.

    I hope all parties can move forward with intensity, in any event.

  12. K-Sensor on April 2nd, 2009 12:05 am

    Maybe Peter should concentrate of making his own hour broadcast and allowing any radio station to SLOT-IT-IN, example Peter shares his program and a site like VOR knows each week they can grab it and add it to their programme guide.

  13. Reck on April 2nd, 2009 1:18 am

    New America:

    Jesus Christ you write just like a freaking jew Attorney or something. Hey, may~B You could Fill Peters time slot…..

    Get a life, or better yet since you don’t have one,
    go whack a few aristocrats for us all!

    Any way, this one’s 4 U bud, Your a joke.
    In a very meritocratic meaning of the term.

    Man’s Sensitivity Test:
    1. In the company of females, intercourse should be referred to as: A. Lovemaking. B. Screwing. C. Taking the pigskin bus to tuna town.
    2. You should make love to a woman for the first time only after you have both shared: A. Your views about what you expect from a sexual relationship. B. Your blood-test results. C. Five tequila slammers.
    3. You time your orgasm so that: A. Your partner climaxes first. B. You both climax simultaneously. C. You don’t miss ESPN Sports Center.
    4. Passionate, spontaneous sex on the kitchen floor is: A. Healthy, creative love-play. B. Not the sort of thing your wife would agree to. C. Not the so rt of thing your wife needs to ever find out about. 5. Spending the whole night cuddling a woman you have just had sex with is: A. The best part of the experience. B. The second best part of the experience. C. $100 extra.
    6. Your wife/girlfriend says she’s gained five pounds in the last month. You tell her that it is: A. Of no influence on your affectionate feelings for her. B. Not a problem, she can join your gym. C. A conservative estimate.
    7. You think today’s sensitive, caring man is: A. A myth. B. An oxymoron. C. A moron.
    8. Foreplay is to sex as: A. An appetizer is to entree. B. Primer is to paint. C. A long line is to an amusement park ride.
    9. Which of the following are you most likely to find yourself saying at the end of a relationship? A. I hope we can still be friends. B. I’m not in right now, please leave a message at the beep. C. Welcome to Dumpsville. Population, YOU.
    10. A woman who is uncomfortable watching you mast*rbate: A. Probably needs a little more time before she can cope with that sort of intimacy. B. Is uptight and a waste of time. C. Shouldn’t have sat next to you on the bus in the first place.
    Evaluating Results:
    If you answered A more than 7 times, check your pants to make sure you really ARE a man.
    If you answered B more than 7 times, check into therapy. You’re a little confused.
    If you answered C more than 7 times, YOU DA MAN!

  14. Iacobvs on April 2nd, 2009 9:32 pm

    Hmm…. an earlier posting stated that Peter Schaenk put down Rick Adams. Why would he do that?

  15. Auntiesemite on April 2nd, 2009 10:09 pm

    This makes me very sad to say the least. This is the very reason why we keep losing traction… Somehow, we continually end up in a round on infighting over who is right, who is a schill, and dare I say, who is a jew… What is the ultimate purpose?..When will we see that this constant division is a JEWISH CONSTRUCT? I agree with Mr Steele that groups and movements lose sight of their original intentions, and are persuaded by self promotion, and/or ratings potential. When we need to focus on reaching out to the like minded of the cause.
    I must say that I’m a bit confused as to why a person would make negative statements about another program host, on another network, when he himself was a guest on said program multiple times. Even if they were good and informative interviews, which they were indeed.
    I truly wish Peter Scheank “All the Best”, and truly hope that he may return to do his broadcasts. Peter Scheank was the very reason that i logged on to VOR to begin with..
    In my humble opinion, I feel that I can say this for the majority of VOR listeners, he will be sorely missed. There is now a giant hole in this network..
    VOR, you have your work cut out for you in filling it..

  16. Wolf on April 2nd, 2009 10:42 pm

    “Hmm…. an earlier posting stated that Peter Schaenk put down Rick Adams. Why would he do that?”

    cuz Adams is an arrogant brown-nosing coward?

  17. Auntiesemite on April 3rd, 2009 6:32 am

    I must clarify my post above.
    this statement may have been made under a gross misunderstanding..

    I wrote;

    “I must say that I’m a bit confused as to why a person would make negative statements about another program host, on another network, when he himself was a guest on said program multiple times. Even if they were good and informative interviews, which they were indeed.”

    This statement was directed at “New America”, who I assume is Mr Steele. If I am incorrect as to this assumption, my most sincere apologies to Mr Steele, and anyone who may have been misled by my comments.
    If I am correct in my assumption, then I stand by my comment..

  18. admin on April 3rd, 2009 5:18 pm

    New America and Edgar Steele are two different people.

  19. New America on April 3rd, 2009 6:07 pm

    in partial reply to Reck:

    you wrote:

    New America:

    Jesus Christ you write just like a freaking jew Attorney or something.

    in reply:
    If we are ever to BE politically effective. we should look to the methods of those who ARE politically effective.

    “”…write just like a freaking jew attorney?”

    Well, look what happened when our ONE attempt at “Feet In The Street, Boots On The Ground” organization – Glenn Miller’’s organization in North Carolina, ran up against a “Jew attorney” named Morris Dees.

    Dees has supporters who have donated more than $120 million dollars to his organization.

    Take Home Assignment: What can we learn from this?

    Extra Credit Question: What can we DO about It, peacefully, and profitably?

    Any “Jew attorney” should be able to write good answers to those questions.

    TRY and find a White Nationalist – outside of Harold Covington, and Terrible Tommy Metzger – who can also write good answers to those questions.

    you wrote:

    Hey, may~B You could Fill Peters time slot…..

    in reply:
    No, I could not begin to fill Peter’s shoes, and, well, I don’t think GCN would go for it.

    Especially GCN’s Alex Jones.

    you wrote:

    Get a life, or better yet since you don’t have one, go whack a few aristocrats for us all!

    in reply:
    Anyone can “get a life.”

    The challenge is to make your life a BETTER life, for your Family, and your RACE.

    And, remember, the Aristocracy is ALWAYS fomenting a Revolution, to install their own, COUNTER-Revolutionary Regime.

    you wrote:

    Any way, this one’s 4 U bud, Your a joke.
    In a very meritocratic meaning of the term.

    in reply:
    I may be a joke, but the issues I address in my writings are very serious.

    If you run into Mishko, tell hm there’s an MMA fighter whose nickname is the “Croatian Sensation.”

    Perhaps – just perhaps – Mishko might need a nickname.

    It would be just like professional wrestling:

    “Well, Nice Guy Mishko has just left the room and… WAIT! CAN YOU HEAR THE CROWD ROAR! Mishkos’s manager, the Croatian Senation, has just entered the ring, and the CROWD GOES WILD! Look! Look! The entire arena is filled with the Croatian Sensation’s followers, all dressed like everyday people, until they took off their shirts and revealed their ‘Black Legion of DOOM!’ black t-shirts! Oh, the humanity!”

  20. Howdy Doody on April 4th, 2009 2:00 pm

    120 million that is TAX free too.

    IMO Giving do nothing Mark Weber the time of day spoke volumes.

    Thanks for nothing, Peter Pan.

  21. Howdy Doody on April 4th, 2009 2:05 pm

    The Weber show will be a millstone around the neck of the great whinner of Oh my computer IMO..

    That show was very odd in light of what has been done and not done IMO.

  22. Howdy Doody on April 4th, 2009 2:11 pm

    Peter

    Should have read your statement first.

    Yes, you have no choice, but to leave.

    I will say this, that even before I read your statement, I wasn’t going to be hearign VOR any more, any way.

    Glad you will stay on the shows as our young folks need you.

    The young folk at VOR should have respected you.

    Happy trails.

    HD

  23. Reck~Less, Abandon on April 4th, 2009 11:14 pm

    NA:
    I really don’t like to attack you or anyone else like minded.
    I only do so when I am attacked first. Or as constructive criticism.
    I can only wish that {Jealous} I could write like you. GCN?
    But, if you / I or anyone else {Missco} cant throw in a joke here and there, we’ll soon crack. Honestly though, I don’t see a peaceful solution. Dee’s etc. should of been whacked long, long ago.
    And the rest of the list is oh so long…..

Comments are closed.