<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Sunic Journal: Interview with Dr. Greg Johnson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reasonradionetwork.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reasonradionetwork.com/?p=4848</link>
	<description>Sapere Aude</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 12:04:18 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Luis Magno</title>
		<link>http://reasonradionetwork.com/?p=4848&#038;cpage=1#comment-9957</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Magno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 22:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reasonradionetwork.com/?p=4848#comment-9957</guid>
		<description>White nationalism is in an existential crisis paralleling the American national existential crisis. 

Judeo-Anglo-Saxon capitalism supports the current high levels of legal immigration which worsens the national unemployment problem, diminishes the percentage of racial Europeans living in the country and creates a host of other problems. 

On the issue of secularism versus religionism the answer is somewhere in between (if it can be expressed that way). In Europe where until recently racialism was not an issue ethnicism reigned supreme. Ethnicism in the United States is now on the table.  

But America is not Europe. The mixed-race issue did not exist in Europe when ethnicism triumphed in Europe. Columbian ethnicism has a unique flavor. Before White Nationalism can favorably and seriously entertain the issue of a Columbian-style American ethnicism it must stop ignoring the festering mixed-race problem within its ranks.  

&quot;Columbus&#039;s legacy is the indispensable psycho-social and historical tool necessary for the rebirth of a sovereign American Republic free of the oligarchical banking and monetary controls that have plagued the first incarnation of the American Republic.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>White nationalism is in an existential crisis paralleling the American national existential crisis. </p>
<p>Judeo-Anglo-Saxon capitalism supports the current high levels of legal immigration which worsens the national unemployment problem, diminishes the percentage of racial Europeans living in the country and creates a host of other problems. </p>
<p>On the issue of secularism versus religionism the answer is somewhere in between (if it can be expressed that way). In Europe where until recently racialism was not an issue ethnicism reigned supreme. Ethnicism in the United States is now on the table.  </p>
<p>But America is not Europe. The mixed-race issue did not exist in Europe when ethnicism triumphed in Europe. Columbian ethnicism has a unique flavor. Before White Nationalism can favorably and seriously entertain the issue of a Columbian-style American ethnicism it must stop ignoring the festering mixed-race problem within its ranks.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Columbus&#8217;s legacy is the indispensable psycho-social and historical tool necessary for the rebirth of a sovereign American Republic free of the oligarchical banking and monetary controls that have plagued the first incarnation of the American Republic.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sigtrygg</title>
		<link>http://reasonradionetwork.com/?p=4848&#038;cpage=1#comment-9944</link>
		<dc:creator>Sigtrygg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 19:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reasonradionetwork.com/?p=4848#comment-9944</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t doubt that paganism and anti-capitalism is popular among white racialists/nationalists (i.e. a minority). 

What I doubt is that it is &quot;sexy&quot; among mainstream folks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t doubt that paganism and anti-capitalism is popular among white racialists/nationalists (i.e. a minority). </p>
<p>What I doubt is that it is &#8220;sexy&#8221; among mainstream folks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: axeman</title>
		<link>http://reasonradionetwork.com/?p=4848&#038;cpage=1#comment-9942</link>
		<dc:creator>axeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 06:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reasonradionetwork.com/?p=4848#comment-9942</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://anonym.to/?http://www.idi.org.il/sites/english/events/Other_Events/Pages/WorkshoponCitizensPoliticsandthePoliticalProfessionDFilc.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Link&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;b&gt;&quot;Israel, like many other liberal or semiliberal democracies, is undergoing a crisis of representation. This crisis manifests itself in diminishing voter turnout; in the weakening of traditional political parties and declining party membership; in the rapid emergence and even faster waning of &quot;trendy&quot; new parties; in the growing popular distrust of the political system and of politicians. In Israel, this crisis is particularly salient because until the 90s, Israeli society was characterized by very high voter turnout and by the centrality of political parties, not only within the political system, but in society as a whole.

There are various reasons for this relatively rapid and radical change. This paper focuses on the ways that the neoliberal transformation that Israel underwent since the mid-80s stripped the concept of popular sovereignty, and even more the practices, of their real meaning. I begin with a discussion of the practical expressions in modern democracies of the concept of popular sovereignty. In the second part, I address the ways in which the neoliberal transformation of Israeli society strengthened an elitist-technocratic model of society and weakened the institutional expressions of popular sovereignty to such an extent that it contributed considerably to the deepening of the crisis of representation.&quot;&lt;/b&gt;

I focus here on Israel because it is a good example of a nationalist ethnostate which shows no sign of losing its nationalist character and objectives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://anonym.to/?http://www.idi.org.il/sites/english/events/Other_Events/Pages/WorkshoponCitizensPoliticsandthePoliticalProfessionDFilc.aspx" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p>
<p><b>&#8220;Israel, like many other liberal or semiliberal democracies, is undergoing a crisis of representation. This crisis manifests itself in diminishing voter turnout; in the weakening of traditional political parties and declining party membership; in the rapid emergence and even faster waning of &#8220;trendy&#8221; new parties; in the growing popular distrust of the political system and of politicians. In Israel, this crisis is particularly salient because until the 90s, Israeli society was characterized by very high voter turnout and by the centrality of political parties, not only within the political system, but in society as a whole.</p>
<p>There are various reasons for this relatively rapid and radical change. This paper focuses on the ways that the neoliberal transformation that Israel underwent since the mid-80s stripped the concept of popular sovereignty, and even more the practices, of their real meaning. I begin with a discussion of the practical expressions in modern democracies of the concept of popular sovereignty. In the second part, I address the ways in which the neoliberal transformation of Israeli society strengthened an elitist-technocratic model of society and weakened the institutional expressions of popular sovereignty to such an extent that it contributed considerably to the deepening of the crisis of representation.&#8221;</b></p>
<p>I focus here on Israel because it is a good example of a nationalist ethnostate which shows no sign of losing its nationalist character and objectives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: axeman</title>
		<link>http://reasonradionetwork.com/?p=4848&#038;cpage=1#comment-9941</link>
		<dc:creator>axeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 06:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reasonradionetwork.com/?p=4848#comment-9941</guid>
		<description>As a counterpoint to what I have just said, it might be interesting to note that Jewland seems to be basically a neo-liberal pro-capitalist regime, which would to some extent suggest that a nationalist ethnostate and the free market can co-exist.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://anonym.to/?http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/isdf/text/Melnick_Mealem1.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Link&lt;/a&gt;

However it does appear these market reforms were introduced only in the 1980s, after the Jewish ethnostate had been solidly established.

There is room for thought and discussion on the matter of capitalism and the nationalist cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a counterpoint to what I have just said, it might be interesting to note that Jewland seems to be basically a neo-liberal pro-capitalist regime, which would to some extent suggest that a nationalist ethnostate and the free market can co-exist.</p>
<p><a href="http://anonym.to/?http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/isdf/text/Melnick_Mealem1.html" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p>
<p>However it does appear these market reforms were introduced only in the 1980s, after the Jewish ethnostate had been solidly established.</p>
<p>There is room for thought and discussion on the matter of capitalism and the nationalist cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: axeman</title>
		<link>http://reasonradionetwork.com/?p=4848&#038;cpage=1#comment-9940</link>
		<dc:creator>axeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 06:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reasonradionetwork.com/?p=4848#comment-9940</guid>
		<description>Thanks The Lemming, I like your way of thinking.

It&#039;s simply saying things as they are.

It is important to instil the correct spiritual/theological reference points among the masses - bearing in mind that, as with most of these things, if you don&#039;t do it, someone else will.  I am not entirely certain however that neo-pagan spirituality/theology is the correct one for Social Nationalist ends.

And Social Nationalism/NS is not a dirty term, Sigtrygg.

It&#039;s a ideal with great relevance and potential.

Why am I not surprised that you berate Mr. Sunic&#039;s &quot;uneducated anti-capitalism&quot;?

Do you believe there is such a thing as educated anti-capitalism?

Or is it that you believe anti-capitalism is misguided in the first place?

Anti-capitalism can hardly be misguided as capitalist forces play such a great role in the challenges that face our nations and peoples.  Capitalist forces and ideals interfere with our objectives.  They are in many ways incompatible.  Capitalism has no racial/ethnic consciousness.

Certainly &lt;i&gt;defending capitalism&lt;/i&gt; in terms of white nationalism is a difficult thing to do.

I would say actually that anti-capitalism is brought up far too little, and I commend the nationalists that do bring it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks The Lemming, I like your way of thinking.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s simply saying things as they are.</p>
<p>It is important to instil the correct spiritual/theological reference points among the masses &#8211; bearing in mind that, as with most of these things, if you don&#8217;t do it, someone else will.  I am not entirely certain however that neo-pagan spirituality/theology is the correct one for Social Nationalist ends.</p>
<p>And Social Nationalism/NS is not a dirty term, Sigtrygg.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a ideal with great relevance and potential.</p>
<p>Why am I not surprised that you berate Mr. Sunic&#8217;s &#8220;uneducated anti-capitalism&#8221;?</p>
<p>Do you believe there is such a thing as educated anti-capitalism?</p>
<p>Or is it that you believe anti-capitalism is misguided in the first place?</p>
<p>Anti-capitalism can hardly be misguided as capitalist forces play such a great role in the challenges that face our nations and peoples.  Capitalist forces and ideals interfere with our objectives.  They are in many ways incompatible.  Capitalism has no racial/ethnic consciousness.</p>
<p>Certainly <i>defending capitalism</i> in terms of white nationalism is a difficult thing to do.</p>
<p>I would say actually that anti-capitalism is brought up far too little, and I commend the nationalists that do bring it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fenrisulfr</title>
		<link>http://reasonradionetwork.com/?p=4848&#038;cpage=1#comment-9937</link>
		<dc:creator>Fenrisulfr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 20:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reasonradionetwork.com/?p=4848#comment-9937</guid>
		<description>One does not have business Xtheising the masses nor paganising them.  If nothing else, who does such a thing?  Some swastika-wearing fairy wearing a Thor&#039;s hammer or cross?  I inquire because such fairies are often part of &#039;white nationalist&#039; *chuckle* proposals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One does not have business Xtheising the masses nor paganising them.  If nothing else, who does such a thing?  Some swastika-wearing fairy wearing a Thor&#8217;s hammer or cross?  I inquire because such fairies are often part of &#8216;white nationalist&#8217; *chuckle* proposals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Magno</title>
		<link>http://reasonradionetwork.com/?p=4848&#038;cpage=1#comment-9928</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Magno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 23:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reasonradionetwork.com/?p=4848#comment-9928</guid>
		<description>If I am correct Greg Johnson claims a secular universalist perspective. I challenge that claim. If anything Johnson&#039;s perspective is narrowly White and Orwellian to boot. 

I thank Tom Sunic for giving Greg a platform. 

Con vivencia y derecho,
Luis Magno</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I am correct Greg Johnson claims a secular universalist perspective. I challenge that claim. If anything Johnson&#8217;s perspective is narrowly White and Orwellian to boot. </p>
<p>I thank Tom Sunic for giving Greg a platform. </p>
<p>Con vivencia y derecho,<br />
Luis Magno</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sigtrygg</title>
		<link>http://reasonradionetwork.com/?p=4848&#038;cpage=1#comment-9923</link>
		<dc:creator>Sigtrygg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 13:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reasonradionetwork.com/?p=4848#comment-9923</guid>
		<description>Promoting paganism is a blind alley in the sense that it has no chance to become part of mainstream culture.  

The same could be said about Tom Sunic&#039;s uneducated anti-capitalism, his (distorted) cult of the 3rd Reich and NS ideology as &quot;pan-whiteism&quot;, just to mention a few of the most obvious blunders.  Any reasonably educated person knows that the German NS movement was more pan-Germanic than pan-European.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Promoting paganism is a blind alley in the sense that it has no chance to become part of mainstream culture.  </p>
<p>The same could be said about Tom Sunic&#8217;s uneducated anti-capitalism, his (distorted) cult of the 3rd Reich and NS ideology as &#8220;pan-whiteism&#8221;, just to mention a few of the most obvious blunders.  Any reasonably educated person knows that the German NS movement was more pan-Germanic than pan-European.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akira</title>
		<link>http://reasonradionetwork.com/?p=4848&#038;cpage=1#comment-9915</link>
		<dc:creator>Akira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reasonradionetwork.com/?p=4848#comment-9915</guid>
		<description>Sorry. 

How&#039;d I do that? 

Those comments above were supposed to be for the Craig Bodeker interview.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry. </p>
<p>How&#8217;d I do that? </p>
<p>Those comments above were supposed to be for the Craig Bodeker interview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://reasonradionetwork.com/?p=4848&#038;cpage=1#comment-9908</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reasonradionetwork.com/?p=4848#comment-9908</guid>
		<description>Please Tom Sunic interview Alex Linder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please Tom Sunic interview Alex Linder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.751 seconds -->
