Top

The Fighting Side of Me: Taking Back our Freedoms

December 13, 2011

Windsor, Ontario senior Natasha Burge

Paul Fromm

  • … reports on gutsy Natasha Burge — suspended for defying minorities and defending Christmas and the flag in Windsor, Ontario;
  • … reflects on regaining White pride by stressing European achievements and refuting White guilt;
  • … discusses his recent talk at the Institute for Historical Review, and plans for the coming demographic tsunami and the replacement of the European founder-settler people of North America;
  • … reports on Marc Lemire’s Internet free speech appeal in Toronto.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Paul:
paul@paulfromm.com

The Sunic Journal: Jonathan Bowden at IONA, Nov. 5, 2011

December 13, 2011

Jonathan Bowden

This is a special broadcast of the Sunic Journal covering the meeting of IONA / London Forum in London, Nov. 5, 2011. Jonathan Bowden gave a speech entitled “European Culture: A Bullet through Steel”.

Jonathan Bowden speaks about the importance of classical literature while focusing on two tragic figures, the King Lear and Antigone. Bowden is the author of the well known ‘Apocalypse TV’ – which features a debate between two intellectuals with different views on how to save Western Civilization.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 56 min.

Contact Tom:
tom.sunic@gmail.com

Jamie Kelso: Instauration magazine, April 1998

December 13, 2011

Instauration-1998-April

Two of the least-White areas of the United States and its territories are Washington, D.C. and Puerto Rico. Both are subjects of the April 1998 issue of Instauration magazine, which Jamie Kelso discusses on December 13, 2011.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Jamie:
24.7keyboard@gmail.com

The Heretics’ Hour: Interview with Olaf Childress

December 12, 2011

Olaf Childress

Carolyn Yeager interviews Mr. Olaf Childress. Topics include:

  • The need for more alternative white newspapers in every state;
  • The need for stronger state power to oppose Federal takeover;
  • The need to stand up to our enemies without fear;
  • Who is controlling our language? To what extent should we self-censor?

Olaf Childress has been publishing his monthly newspaper, The First Freedom, for 12 years running–quite a record. An Alabama native, he is a strong supporter of the spirit of the South against the destructive effects of the Federal government. To subscribe to the newspaper: Mail $25 for one year (12 issues!) to P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Alabama 36576. Special for new readers only: 6 months for only $5!

27 MB / 32 kbps mono / 1 hour 56 min.

Contact Carolyn:
carolyn carolynyeager.com

Jamie Kelso: Instauration, May 1998

December 12, 2011

Instauration-1998-May

On December 12, 2011 Jamie Kelso talks present and past about our White common sense cause. In the present he looks at the remarkable political opening for the American Third Position party as Ron Paul now appears able to win the January 3 Iowa caucus primary. In the past, Kelso reads Wilmot Robertson’s tribute to another “Thomas Jefferson of his time”, Carleton Putnam, from the pages of the May 1998 issue of Instauration magazine.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Jamie:
24.7keyboard@gmail.com

The Stark Truth: Interview with Siryako Akda

December 9, 2011

rice paddies

Robert interviews Siryako Akda. Topics include:

  • How nationalism and race is viewed in the Philippines and elsewhere outside the West;
  • How the adoption of New Right ideas outside the West will give legitimacy to the New Right movement in the West.
  • How what is happening in the West (e.g. “hate crime” legislation, Political Correctness, deindustrialization, mass immigration and multiculturalism) is a prelude to what may happen to the rest of the world;
  • The “Yankee go home — and take me with you!” syndrome;
  • Third Way economics such as distributism.

Siryako Akda is Filipino graduate of political science. He is an avid observer of international politics, and has a keen interest in right-wing metapolitics. He blogs at untimelyruminations.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 56 min.

Contact Robert:
robert_stark_la hotmail.com

Jamie Kelso: Ron Paul Revolution 2007 & 2008

December 9, 2011

RNC_Xcel_front_gate_Jamie_Kelso

In 2007 and 2008 it was electrifying to be part of what the Ron Paul Revolution accomplished, all the way up to the Republican Convention in the Xcel Energy Center in St. Paul, Minnesota. Jamie Kelso had the privilege of being the organizer of the Ron Paul support rally that lasted four days continuously at the entrance of the Xcel Center. But the 2012 Paul campaign has been building on the 2008 base for four years, and now has a shot at the LEAD in some early primary states, including the Iowa caucus coming up January 3. In his December 9, 2011 show Kelso talks about Ron Paul’s stunning leap into second place in Iowa polls, behind only the despicable chameleon/man Newt Gingrich.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Jamie:
24.7keyboard@gmail.com

The European American Hour: Emma West, the Modern English Joan of Arc

December 8, 2011

Emma West, Joan of Arc

Stan discusses the persecution and heroism of Joan of Arc and Emma West.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Stan:
eamerica123 roadrunner.com

The Orthodox Nationalist: The Rise of the Medieval Serbian Empire

December 8, 2011

Saint Stephen Milutin of Serbia

Matt Johnson discusses:

  • Serbia and Byzantium;
  • The role of St. Milutin in Serbian development;
  • The decline of Byzantium and the rise of Venice;
  • Greco-Slavic civilzation and its importance.

Please check out Matt Johnson’s book Heavenly Serbia and the Medieval Idea, which was discussed in this show.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 56 min.

Contact Matt:
fr_raphael yahoo.com

Visit Matt’s VoR program page, for books, essays and articles.

Jamie Kelso: Instauration, February 2000

December 8, 2011

Instauration-2000-Feb

On December 8, 2011 Jamie Kelso wonders whether Wilmot Robertson was able to give any sort of farewell to his devoted patriot audience over 25 years of publication of Instauration when he published the very last issue for February, 2000. Kelso doesn’t find any hint given to Robertson’s subscribers in this last issue that it would be his last. Robertson would live another five years, dying at age 95 in 2005.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Jamie:
24.7keyboard@gmail.com

The Mark Weber Report: Why US Politicians Boast of ‘American Exceptionalism’

December 7, 2011

Republican presidential candidates (with the notable exception of Ron Paul) and other prominent politicians boast of their belief in “American exceptionalism.” This is more than “feel good” talk. Such rhetoric is used as a pretext or justification for otherwise inexcusable policies that actually harm America and the world. Most of the world understandably regards such talk as dangerously arrogant and foolish. It’s no coincidence that the politicians who talk the loudest about “American exceptionalism” are also the most craven in their pandering to Jewish-Zionist power and vehement in their support for Israel. Americans are not inherently more virtuous or “freedom loving” than other peoples. America’s extraordinarily rapid rise, and its prosperity and eminence during the twentieth century, are due to objective historical factors, which are no longer as relevant as they were in the past.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 56 min.

Contact Mark Weber:
weber@ihr.org

The Stark Truth: Citizens Party Presidential Debate

December 7, 2011

Top left: Keith john Ferguson; top right: Mark B. Graham; bottom left: Charles Earl Harvey; bottom right: Max Riekse.

Robert Stark holds a debate of the Citizens Party 2012 presidential candidates. The candidates participating are:

Keith John Ferguson, born in 1961 in Lowell Massachusetts, is a hard worker who cares about all the people as one people. A plumber by trade, he has four children. His family has been here since the late 1700s.

Mark B. Graham, born in 1960, is married with three children. He resides in Saint Albans, West Virginia, is a Methodist, and has an A.S. in computer science. His campaign Web site is MarkBGraham2012.com

Charles Earl Harvey has a masters degree from Wayne State University and is a clinical therapist in mental health. He is a ballroom dance instructor; he is active in community service, police reserve, and volunteer hospitals; he has served as councilman and volunteer fire fighter. His campaign Web site is CharlesHarveyForPresident.com.

Max Riekse is an American nationalist, populist, and America-firster from western Michigan. He served as a military intelligence officer in the US Army in Vietnam, and later as a public school teacher. He has a wife and one son. His campaign Web site is MadMaxForPresident.com.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 56 min.

Contact Robert:
robert_stark_la hotmail.com

The Fighting Side of Me: Truth Instead of Political Correctitude

December 6, 2011

Terry Tremaine

Paul Fromm:

  • … denounces the Crown for prosecuting Terry Tremaine for “hate” and seeking yet another delay in a hearing challenging their long delay in this case;
  • … praises Gatineau, Quebec for its guidelines for immigrants — no bribes, honour killings, or sexual abuse of children;
  • … wonders how an Indian reserve (Attawapiskat) can get over $90,000,000 for its 1,850 people in five years and still be living in dire poverty with some people living in tents and unheated shacks;
  • … explains the origin of Sec. 13 of Canada’s Human Rights Act. It started as censorship of telephone answering machines and then graduated to Internet censorship;
  • … outlines the Canadian Association for Free Expession’s submissions — “hate” law based on scientific bunk — arguments at next week’s Marc Lemire Appeal in Toronto

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Paul:
paul@paulfromm.com

The Sunic Journal: Martin Webster at IONA, Nov. 5, 2011

December 6, 2011

Martin Webster in 1974

This is a special broadcast of the Sunic Journal covering the meeting of IONA / London Forum in London, Nov. 5, 2011. Martin Webster gave a speech entitled “Let’s stop the silly quest for a super-hero with a magic wand”.

Martin Webster is the former National Organiser of the National Front in its 1970′s heyday and many credit him with propelling the NF onto the national stage and making it a household name. He a fierce critic of International Zionism and currently edits the email bulletin ‘Electric Loose Cannon’.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 56 min.

Contact Tom:
tom.sunic@gmail.com

Jamie Kelso: Instauration, November 1996, continued

December 6, 2011

In the Dec. 6, 2011 show, Jamie Kelso continues the discussion from the pages of the November 1996 Instauration magazine, another classic from possibly the best mind that the White nationalist movement has produced, Wilmot Robertson.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Jamie:
24.7keyboard@gmail.com

The Heretics’ Hour: Günter Deckert on the Battle against the “Far Right”

December 5, 2011

Nazi Monopoly
Manufacturing evidence:
This Pogramly board game was confiscated in 1998.

Topics include:

  • Günter Deckert describes his own current court proceedings in Mannheim for helping translate a ‘forbidden’ book into German;
  • New, loud calls to ban the NPD and all “far right” parties;
  • Is a change of direction in store for the NPD (National Party of Germany) with it new leader, Holger Apfel?
  • Why the Zwickau “neo-nazi terror cell” media frenzy is reminiscent of 9/11 with its manufactured evidence;
  • Is there any real advantage in a European common currency or is it just a banker’s dream come true?

Note: The scraping noise in the first half hour, for which we apologize, did not continue in the rest of the program.

27 MB / 32 kbps mono / 1 hour 56 min.

Contact Carolyn:
carolyn carolynyeager.com

Jamie Kelso: Instauration, November 1996

December 5, 2011

The November 1996 issue of Instauration magazine is the starting point for Jamie Kelso’s Dec. 5, 2011 program.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Jamie:
24.7keyboard@gmail.com

Non-Equality or Incommensurability

December 3, 2011

By Daniel Sienkiewicz
Jacob Marley ghost

You bear the chains from centuries of Europeans questing after objective and universal foundations, equality lending itself as one of the most convenient abstractions in service of universal criteria. The chain breaks at the weakest link and non-equality is taken as the apparent response in correction of this conceptual error, its crisis.

Of course, quite the opposite of modern day Scrooge’s our chain has not been forged of niggardliness – quite the opposite, it was born in a spirit of charity and liberation, universal brotherhood of man, causing us to lose sight of patterns, of our own particularly.

“I don’t have to tell you about the tyranny of patterns. That is the rubric under which we meet. What you may not know is that you have to accept them.” – G.B.

Non-equality is not merely an insufficient emancipation from our chains. In fact, it reconstructs the very framework, the paradigm, “the rubric under which we meet.”

. . . . .

Scrooge - Marley Ghost Most Appropriate

“Paradigm” emerges as yet another example of terms that have been abused. We have discussed the abuse and misuse of other terms, such as “leftism”, which is really open-borders, obsequious liberalism that is promoted to Whites by Jewish academics and political planners. “Social constructionism” is another example, promoted as idealist by Jewish academics, as opposed to its being the realist notion that it is meant to be – race is not a “mere” social construct; it is a real social construct. Vico, one of the fist proponents of social constructionism, was realist. In fact, he was also one of the first opponents of Cartesianism. As a similar result of abused terms, those who balk at the word “paradigm” perhaps need to be reminded that Jewish academia latches onto good concepts, obfuscates, abuses and deploys them to their ends.

Taking a social constructionist premise that a paradigm does not begin with an object of inquiry, but rather with a group of practitioners (“if a tree falls in the woods and there are no White people left to hear it”…), a paradigm is a pattern, a logic of meaning and action shared by a group of people. When the logic of meaning and action of one paradigm does not compare and mesh well with another, i.e., when the means and ends do not jibe between two paradigms, they are said to be incommensurate.

Though it is not the first time that I have known of the illustration of checkers and chess, the VoR’s Peter Schaenk used the analogy of Jews playing chess while Whites are playing checkers. Whites continually get routed as a result, as the chess player plans farther in advance. This is an example of incommensurate paradigms, incommensurate logics of meaning and action: Jews playing chess while Whites play checkers.

Christmas Carol, FZ 03

In reality, the matter is extremely serious and it is of urgent importance that we begin to understand and instantiate paradigmatic differences, differences that make a difference.

Thesis: The notion of non-equality entails false comparison, elitism, unnecessary conflict and destruction of our people. It is rectified by concern with paradigmatic differences, classifications (of race) which make a difference as they focus attention on qualitatively different processes that provide means of systemic cooperation among and between classifications.

Examples of detrimental blending of incommensurate paradigms are abundant, but the results are predictable – unnecessary destruction to vital class members and unnecessary conflict with other groups. On the other hand, by ongoing attention to maintenance of the qualitative difference of the White class, we are flexible to deal with various antagonists as need be while disputes over which is enemy is worst are kept to a minimum.

By way of examples, I have already engaged in discussion of how traditional and modern gender agendas are incommensurate; traditional women seek to maintain the base of the hierarchy of motives for themselves while traditional males tend to pursue the top. Reversing modernist males will seek the base of the hierarchy, existence and being, while overcompensating modernists, like Clinton, will pursue achievement, extending themselves beyond the interests of the class. Reversing modernist women will seek the top of the hierarchy, while overcompensating modernist women will perhaps undermine the class as some sort of radical Marxist type.

As mentioned last time, with the addition of some poor grammar, the Black Power movement, where it asserts that the Black man will rule, is seeking after the top of the hierarchy while a good portion of White men are seeking to warrant their existence, the base of the hierarchy.

Near the beginning of the incommensurate gender agendas article, I cite Philip Rushton’s analysis demonstrating different rates of sexual maturity between different peoples, such as Blacks, Whites and East Asians. This provides another example of incommensurate paradigms. Specifically, I use the example of the White girl who may in fact be a marginal within an earlier stage of her development and snapped-up by the earlier maturing and sexually aggressive Black, as a result, even though she is not defective, rather she would be something more like the ”cream of the class”, the paragon of White womanhood, in fully developed maturity. Her appropriately matching White partner would be left out of the equation because of his later sexual maturity, and with that, his greater sublimation, the attendant circumspection which might have so many corrective effects. This catastrophic meshing of incommensurate paradigms, disrupting and altering the co-evolution of millennia, is often perpetrated by other White men, on their high horse, out to show the little ladies how objective and “morally superior” that they are overcoming White male defense. But notice the loss of the girl who has become a mud-shark and the boy who is relegated to the beta male 86 list is not necessarily characterized by better or worse, but of ignored qualitative differences and processes. In truth these differences are profound, a tremendous loss suffered as a result of the attempted integration of incommensurate logics of sexual maturity.

Whites are taking more steps toward reproduction, learning more, cultivating resource and amenity along the way but often losing out to Blacks who are going right at it, while the Jews are playing chess, are given to be up-in-the-head wind-bags, continually misframing issues to the detriment of Whites. IF we can get the Jewish rule structure off of our backs, Blacks are a weekend operation (TT). In the meantime and nevertheless, Blacks are not so easy in all respects. Black musical ability, athletic ability, street smarts and sexual patterns as compared to the abilities that distinguish Whites provide still another example, ridiculous perhaps, of imposed incommensurability.

Human Biodiversity is not really right wing, but so long as others understand that the White Class claims the same turf, we may wish them well in promoting the idea. In fact, human biodiversity comports exactly with the notion of incommensurability as well. Otherwise, when variables, such as I.Q., are isolated, many important, evolutionary contingencies of the pattern are perhaps being removed. Cooperative functions of their level of development or niche would be ignored by false comparisons as “non-equal” instead of their being regarded as different qualitative functions from others within the class. Thus, isolating one sort of skill ought to be considered carefully so as not to be detrimental to the ecology of the class as a whole. Who is going to emerge to save the White class in a given instant can be a surprise, but it stands to reason that they may not emerge from the ranks of the most comfortable. As Cobb has pointed out, it could be somebody quite ordinary (or worse) who makes the difference, not necessarily the best chess player. It is possible to be too compassionate, but while recruiting to the ranks of White defense, for an indefinite time, in fact, focus need be on those who will fight; giving encouragement to a broad range of Whites to lend their agency with the notion that they may be of help, whatever their skills, so long as the end game is commensurate with the 14 words. My position is, who it is that will fight will sort out who is worthy.

Objectivity, as we have discussed, is another incommensurate logic to the relative interests of the White Class. In fact, objectivism is one of the chief culprits in leveling paradigms into universal criteria.

There are many examples of incommensurability bearing upon the class that may be explored farther, perhaps pursued in operational verification.

Now then, from the individual scale to White nations and states, the principle of qualitative difference holds true as well.

European from non-European is the more important, paradigmatic difference. Nevertheless, the nations, states and regions within the European peoples, which I am calling the White Class, are important as well, and need the freedom to be fully distinct and of their own population.

Cristmas Carol, large

The key is to distinguish indigenous native Europeans and non-native Europeans (especially elite) along with elite, White traitors. This is to distinguish a trivial difference from profound difference, and to avoid unnecessary ecological blunder: In maintaining a view toward the ecology of qualitative processes, of paradigmatic differences and the buffering of the European nations our White Class paradigm may be analogized to symbiotically functioning organs of a body; or take TT’s idea that the European nations and states might be looked upon as compartments of a ship. The Class ensconces relatively trivial differences from profound differences; those evolved in Europe over tens of thousands of years are within the class. Nevertheless, recognizing the profundity and potential acrimony of attempts to blend the European states, let us call them incommensurate paradigms, their distinctions needing to be maintained. We do not want to hear that Germany’s loans failed, about the Euro, about the E.U. Poles should not be inundating Britain – all broaching of paradigms. Nevertheless, with state sovereignties established, whether by analogy of the compartmentalized ship or the body and its parts, when speaking of the class, we include all native Europeans. No, they should not be imposing upon each other. But, in defending against non-Europeans, we have our most important common ground as the White Class, here in Europe, in the White States of America and elsewhere.

While understanding that the disastrous treaties that led one European country after another into WWI calls for significant caution, a basis of voluntary assistance as opposed to mandatory alliance can prevent that sort of overall disaster. Toward the end of avoiding inter-European war, Dr. Lowell’s focus on regions probably has merit as well.

So long as the focus continually comes back on the White Class and its needs there need be no inconsistency among the various challenges that we face. While I am persuaded that our two greatest enemies are elite Jews and elite traitorous Whites, that may appear absurd to Western Europeans faced with massive Muslim immigration. It may seem absurd to the American Southerner faced with masses of Blacks, with their long pre-evolution lending bio-power to pejorative characteristics, menacing characteristics thereof faced by South Africa as well. In fact their population growth, the fastest in world, combined with the negative aspects of their bio-power, are arguably among the greatest threats of all. In the U.S. South-West, it is the Mestizos invasion and population that emerges most urgent. Still others will rightfully claim that Chinese overpopulation, capacity for technology, economic hegemony, combined with an unsympathetic attitude are what’s most alarming. India’s population and economy can be the worry for others. Still others will see low ranking traitors to be the relevant concern. Pierce was not above critiques of popular culture. The truth is that they are all problems for us, and they all merit defense in an ongoing course of vigilance and tact. While some may wish to defend their particular state only; it is the White Class in full that can provide the numbers, skills and the territory to win the war; and thus should be our full organizational outlook. Secondly, we ought to be able to agree that it is the policy makers who impose immigration and integration upon us who are to be prioritized as enemies – they are apparently Jewish elites and elite White traitors. Whatever the case, whatever the contingency or the immediate enemy, we maintain coherence through the Class. With an ongoing focus on the White Class, its enemies will emerge and be implicated appropriately.

Jews do not always make sense to us. Why would they destroy America? Yet, they are largely responsible for doing so. While Muslims in Europe will hurt rank-and-file Jews, the Muslim presence suggests European alliance with Jewish elites. We should not have a good deal of faith in how that alliance will work out for Europeans.

. . . . .

All the more urgent it becomes to get to this matter of paradigmatic difference, “differences that make a difference” as opposed to throwing our hands in the air and saying that “nothing is equal.”

Corporations, the military industrial complex and Zionist elites would probably just as soon go with that, too.

Christmas Carol, 3d

I emphasize non-sameness as opposed to non-equality, while understanding the paranoia of those who do not want to take their eyes off the power, and who think that they are trying to divide and conquer by lowly racial conflict. Nevertheless, If we do not recognize broad paradigmatic differences of class (race), the back-and-forth in run-away effect is going to stay in pejorative homeostasis: after classificatory bounds are broken by those who do not care about our classification, “objective men”, perhaps resting on a notion of non-equality, are empowered to farther clear away White men of racial/class consciousness – that is, if paradigmatic difference is swept aside in favor of “non-equalitariansm”, and no critique is made of disingenuous positions and paradigmatic differences.

The equalitarian/non-equalitarian universalistic paradigm runs roughshod over our paradigmatic difference, our incommensurate logics of meaning and action. The narcissism of false comparison is apt to breed vain elitism, obnoxious, unnecessary competition and strife not only within the class, the race, the paradigm, but also between the classes. Hence, misusing and wasting people within and without the class, it breeds contempt. While I can agree that there is a such thing as too much compassion with and without the group, we must first adopt this answer of who we are and then determine how most effectively to deal with our own varying qualities, our traitors and our enemies. It would seem a maximum of cooperation and most efficient antagonisms would be achieved by recognizing paradigmatic difference.

Non-equality is not merely over-simplistic in not sufficiently characterizing the qualities of our White patterns in their varied, ecologically disbursed niches; by merely saying that we are quantifiably “better”, it engages competitions that we should not, as they are a misuse of particular qualities - not acknowledging relatedness, indebtedness, shared interests while instigating reciprocally escalating diatribe within the class.

Moreover, non-equality is not merely an insufficient emancipation from our chains. In fact, it reconstructs the very framework, “the rubric under which we meet,” the paradigm of universal criteria. Inasmuch, the argument of ‘non-equality’ sets in motion logics of competition, unnecessary competition, not only within the White Class but also with other groups – logically entailing the hubris, the narcissism of false comparison from which ensues unnecessary, poorly conceived dispute, reciprocally escalating diatribe, and ultimately, fairly arbitrary war.

Thus, the notion of paradigm becomes crucial in delineating the class as well. The paradigm characterizes its qualitative form and its logics of meaning and action – in this case, the cultural pattern, the class. It delimits our primary accountability and ecology from recognition of other classes in pervasive ecology. The logics of meaning and action of one pattern will match well enough, that is, be commensurate, while another will not, its logics being incommensurate.

Marley in air

To say that all are equal or none are equal, or to say that all races are equal or no races are equal, is overly simplistic and misleading in assuming that all peoples are working in accordance with the same fundamental logics of meaning and action: A logical consequence of this modernistic, universalistic narcissism and its not being true, is misunderstanding, vain comparisons and dispute, even where some parties were not intending to compete.

Equality and non-equality is contrasted with not being the same, sameness and difference as opposed to equality and inequality. Talk of sameness, difference and incommensurability creates patterns of cooperation and complementarity in sensitizing us to look for these qualitative differences that make a difference, incommensurate logics, rather than to ignore them with the didactic elitism, exploitation, power plays and the conflict of falsely compared criteria. This fosters more of an ecological outlook, toward cooperation within the class (race) and negotiation between classes (races).

. . . . .

Content footnotes:

Instigated to compete on an equalitarian basis, a fool would take the Black up on his dare to call him a nigger to his face. Though some Whites will be able to beat him, this sort of competition is incommensurate with our abilities – we can easily take recourse in various strategies, have sundry technology at our disposal, can easily build coalitions to offset his bio-power and defend our way of life –

As for the matter of I.Q. within the class; intelligence perhaps does not only function in the relative linearity of I.Q. but also in patterned ecological disbursement: one brother has a genius level I.Q., a sister passes her NY and NJ Bar exams upon first attempt, another brother contracts lucrative restoration projects of The Amex Building and NYC Post office, while still another has an artistic bent while being vigilant of racial issues.

Trauma of various kinds, both literal and as a matter of pervasive disconfirmation may also explain how assessment of intelligence can be trivial and not take into account re-routing in accordance with various deep, evolutionary pathways.

I have known people with high I.Q.’s who struck me as stupid in important ways – was unimpressed by the theories of the man said to have the world’s highest I.Q. I have seen very high I.Q. people losing track of important matters. Nevertheless, I do not want to take this issue too far, as I am happy for very high I.Q. people to do their thing providing that they do not destroy the ecology of the class

More, low I.Q. Whites, who may have significant qualities and abilities to contribute, may lose out with the argument that I.Q. is our singularly distinguishing attribute as opposed to our full, qualitative distinctions as a White Class.

Blacks are not so easy in all respects. Black musical ability, athletic ability, street smarts and sexual patterns as compared to the abilities that distinguish Whites provide still another example of incommensurability. These abilities are compelling to many and often cited as that which forgives a multitude of sins. Agreed, it is absurd, after all, would we rather have jazz and basketball as opposed to a lovely White woman, reasonable men and an amenable society? Nevertheless, this tendency suggests that one ought not to over-indulge the Blacks-are-so-stupid argument, particularly for the sake of the un-initiated; as there are different kinds of intelligence that are apt to make the argument look bad if unqualified. More, in the context of America, they know the ropes, having been there a long time. Thus, using the argument that they are stupid, you will find yourself saying of the mud-sharks, “she’s stupid, she’s stupid, she’s stupid”, and you will barely stop. Rather than proffering snobbery, probably better to add focus on Black violence, rape and societal decay in particular, in contrast to the safe and amenable White way of life. The broader pattern of White sublimation, its strength and intelligence in a protracted sense is incommensurate and as yet opaque, unarticulated to many.

The Stark Truth: RamZPaul on the London Tram Incident

December 2, 2011

Tram woman

Robert Stark and returning guest RamZPaul discuss:

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 56 min.

Contact Robert:
robert_stark_la hotmail.com

Jamie Kelso: Republican Jewish Coalition Snubs Ron Paul, Day 2

December 2, 2011

pauldeb_dees

The Republican Jewish Coalition is now in the second day of justifying its mind-boggling act of excluding Ron Paul from their Republican presidential candidates forum in just five days, on December 7. As the story goes viral, thankfully, Jamie Kelso looks at the implications of this turning point in his December 2, 2011 radio show. Will the 7 invited neo-cons Bachmann, Gingrich, Huntsman, Romney, Cain, Perry, and Santorum show any character at all on December 7th by mentioning the outrage of Ron Paul’s exclusion? Don’t hold your breath.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Jamie:
24.7keyboard@gmail.com

Bottom