Top

Leftism as a Code Word (Part 2): The White Class

November 19, 2011

By Daniel Sienkiewicz

White Class

Dedicated to Charlotte Parker

When our advocates call our enemies “The Left” they are making a crucial mistake – obfuscating our two greatest problems and the means of solution at the same time.

They are obfuscating the agency of Jewish machinations, such as perversion of the terms.

People within the class, contributing diverse skills could make it stronger – “diversity” might be “strength” in that way.

Biodiversity in terms of assuring genetic flexibility and the likelihood of survival through various contingencies is certainly advisable, including our separate difference and differences as Whites.

But the merit of biodiversity among our people and biodiversity from other groups within the world is transformed into a term “diversity”, which of course [?], means integration.

Multi-cultural”, a term that would seem to appeal to the sovereign maintenance of different cultures in the world is perverted into a term meaning integration into a mono-cultural world.

Marginals within the class could have more perspective on our systemic needs (knowing where the shoe pinches), and more of a vested interest in ecological, systemic maintenance of the class; but those outside or inasmuch induced to be antagonistic to the class are called, “marginals.”

Puerile female incitement to genetic competition might create friendly competition within the class, but is pandered to without the class and called White men’s incitement of racial hatred.

We would rather not be diverse from Asians, Arabs, Mestizos and Africans? Of course we would. We want to encourage them to integrate with us, become Westernized and envelop us? Of course Not. Nevertheless, Jewish academics and political planners have blurred the lines of diversity and marginals, particularly those outside the class – entailing their deleterious, non-ecological integration with us – putting the world on its present course of systemic runaway headed for catastrophe. Thus, the White Class serves the world as well as itself in performing the duty of maintaining the separate distinction of itself from other classes (i.e., races) in systemic corrective to Jewish machinations.

Though we cannot merely do as we will to non-Whites toward that end, we should work toward ways of their humane deportation and separation, as we are indeed, warranted to defend the relative interests of our class against population explosion and its incursion upon our people, our habitats. Nevertheless, while Jewish elitists are pandering, instigating and preventing us from taking up the relative interests of our classification; so too are pseudo objectivists.

When the Right talks in terms of quantities not accountable to qualitative differences, paradigmatic differences, ecological niches, relative interests of the class, it is culpable as well.

Taking our hermeneutic circle back to this second problem and making its distinction further -

In distinction from Rightist objectivism, The White Class.

So long as it serves the relative, relational interests of our class, rightist type preoccupation with disciplines pursuing objective abstractions beyond or within biological nature is valid, often yielding important “objective” scientific results. But as we’ve pointed out, in truth, it never fully exists for us; in particular as people are mammals, caring about relationships. But moreover, objectivity always needs to be gauged against the Left’s human sized classification as we must beware that the quantifying metaphors of physics not breach the optimal requirements of biology. As A and B observed: people are biological creatures, requiring optimal, not maximal levels of need satisfaction, quantifiable excesses and deficiencies becoming toxic. Biological nature rarely works within lethal variables; we do not eat because we are starving, we eat as we are hungry.

We do not even necessarily fight for the fact that extinction is forecast and because our race is subject to statistically more violence. As Habermas observed, we do not tend to learn and be motivated unless we can see our subjective interests involved. Our subjective interest, seeing what good it is for us to pursue the relative interests of the White Class, needs to connect. That is one reason why the 14 words is effective, it advocates White survival and subjective interests at the same time. We might rather, fight because our women, our co-evolutionary women, land and property are being taken by apes; because we would receive just reward by partaking in and fighting on behalf of our relative class.

Classification could provide the context for those subjective real life processes, ecology and accountability. However, while both Jews and disingenuous Rightists exploit and pervert objectivist values against our classification; Whites who demonize the Left, per se, are complicit, albeit perhaps unwittingly, with its obstruction as well. Thus, clarifying this central need of class falls in line with Dr. Sunic’s semantic disentangling project: since the necessary classification of our overall process, discrimination on its basis and acting accordingly is being blocked, stigmatized as ‘leftist’, critically analyzed as ‘ethnocentric’ and criminalized as ‘racist.’

 Upon “de-obfuscating” these attributions it becomes clear

While striving after White homelands (plural), we need to re-establish classification of Whites and assert our relative, relational interests in revolutionary contrast to our centuries long customs: pseudo objectivism, universalism, Christianity, scientism capitalism, liberalism, sheer individualism. These pursuits being void of context, void of class, broach accountability and ecology. They have us treating non-Whites as being the same as us, with interests that we value equally if not more to our own because we are supposedly innocent and objectively motivated, as opposed to relative, relational and particularly accountable to the White Class.

Unless we want to deny the out of Africa theory we are marking a distinguishing classification to some extent. However, it is not necessary to deny, as it is no compliment to them and no insult to us. We might just as well say that we have them in our past, their traits resurfacing where necessary and we do not want to go back (e.g., to their short sighted aggression and irresponsible breeding). Classifying in spite of the fact that we can, unfortunately, breed with other races, is not wrong to do, on the contrary, it is more than valid – that is our solution: the manageable means of accountability and ecology. It is not a mere construct – it is real - warrantably assertable and operationally verifiable.

Neither can we avoid classifying whether deliberately or de facto. In modernity’s disordering prohibition of classification that often devolves simply to male/female (subject next time). But unlike that rightist objectivism, in which classifications are an upshot caused by mere forces of nature, deliberate classification rather sets in motion the course of agency – the means to construct ourselves as a people: in classifying ourselves, we establish accountability, coherence, agency and warrant.

Nor is it arbitrary and superficial. Defining who we are, who our class is, is not difficult, especially if the national and regional boundaries are respected: We are persons evolved in the context of Europe (and Russia) over the course of 40,000 years, with a bit of Neanderthal, out of Africa for a longer time. In defining who ‘we’ and ‘they’ are, Giles made the good suggestion that we ought to call ourselves Europeans (meaning differentiated indigenously in the context of Europe), them Africans, Israelis, and various Asians. There was also a suggestion for a biological constitution. I concur. We may declare our DNA our nation and connect it to various points of land eventually, even if not contiguous, as Alaska is apart from the continental U.S. – in fact, that would be tactically better, safer. Better still, this biological nation should be based on an updated Articles of Confederation (TT). However small to begin, it is possible. We can easily get enough people to join, and it does not require relinquishing current citizenship, national or regional distinctions. Before long, our thinkers will find a way to ratify our nation before the world – we will become powerful and agile, managing a hermeneutic process between momentary observations of our DNA and its protracted expressions organized of The Class.

A non-Jewish Left, The White Class, is only an oxymoron according to the definition of the Left that people have been maneuvered into by Jewish academics and political planners. Jews want us to be defined as Rightist – in the speculation of a universal religion, anti-social, pseudo-objective individualists – because it is weak and amoral; they want to portray us on the side of the corporate “individual” of U.S. law, us to seem like the force behind the military industrial complex and not the Zionists. They want us to be Rightists. Not Leftists who organize on the basis of the White Class as a full social group, with relative, relational accountability to and from those on top to those in more fundamental stages of developmental (within the life time) and evolutionary (beyond the lifetime), process.

Nevertheless, White traitors fall outside the class by dint of being traitors and are probably our worst enemy. The Right says I’m better therefore you can die, while the Left says you might be better at one thing, but your life is not mutually exclusive to mine, and I can do something else. The egghead who can invent a mathematical formula that facilitates space travel is providing an account, of sorts, but insufficient if he unnecessarily cuts himself off from the flexibility of a sustaining network and process: parentage, women, young, farmers, technicians, soldiers and environment. More, through evolution, his i.q. may in fact have mutated from the sublimation and corresponding cooperation which is as likely as that to be responsible for the relatively non-violent and amenable day to day White way of life – one of our strongest points.

There is nothing idealistic about it: accountability is entailed straight away in the moment we classify ourselves. Separatism is a first step, separatism is an ultimate aim and separatism is always possible. It is entirely possible to coordinate and it is entirely consistent, in sync with taking on Zog, the corporate plutocracy and the military industrial complex. It would call for manageable sub-classifications, of course: but neither are the nations, states, regions, unions, guilds and lone agents contradictory of White Leftism – on the contrary. More, so long as it does not transcend the well being of the class and its habitats, the White Left is not contradictory to morals or other intangibles, individualism, languages, creativity, achievement. Nor tangibles, such as public and private property, our mutual habitat, free enterprise and industry; a reasonable amount of wealth and a reasonable social safety net mutually. Further, in recognizing paradigmatic, qualitative difference of patterns among and between the classes (races) of people, we have the means of cooperative negotiation as opposed to a narcissistic vision of equality – non-equality that instigates reciprocally escalating diatribe and war. It is not that I personally care for non-Whites and traitors – I don’t; and punishment is indeed, in order – but one does have to pick their fights and there does come a point where fighting is impractical. Note that we are subsuming Darwinism under a broader naturalism of classificatory ecology.

Of our agency, The White Left is for us to define. It is not as much on an economic basis. Rich White people have bad will particularly as they are not accountable to Whites. While that might be almost all of the time, it has more to do with their being traitors than because they have money. The White Left could allow for reasonable wealth – maybe after 5 million, one would be taxed 75% ? We’ll work these matters out. See Bowery, for example, on homestead land tax exemptions; land ownership beyond that amount would be subject to a tax that could fund a space program, even. And we need not necessarily provide a safety net much beyond subsistence, food, shelter and heat; some training, a menial job.

The White Class does not contradict nationalism – excluding Jews from leftism and nationalism is NOT an oxymoron by definition. Can you say “national socialism?” It was leftist until the night of the long knives when they went over the top and became elitist, capitalist empire builders (see Matt Johnson on, “it’s empire building, not nationalism that makes war”); too bad coordinating the expulsion of Jews from Europe and Russia could not have been the extent of their dealings with the rest of Europe. The White Class is commensurate with RamzPaul’s emphasis here that nationalism can, in fact, resolve many issues. Having frequently been irritated myself, by the “northern” European thing, as in, only people above he 40th parallel are European, or “White”, I can agree, emphatically, that we can all be for Sweden being Swedish, southern European nations being discretely their own, etc.

This could also accommodate non-biological diversity as DeBenoist seeks; he apparently wants to preserve his language and the fine variety of his French culture; we can agree to that, but ultimately, we should not accept passive resignation for non-Europeans living within France or anywhere in the European continent. If one cherishes cultural expressions while accepting a situation that facilitates the disgusting pairing of French women with Africans, they are throwing the baby out with the bath water and we must side with French Whites more radical. We are willing to help greatly, but not for allowing that kind of diversity to spread to the rest of Europe. We value French women and men, not mulattos speaking French. At the same time, we need not exploit and destroy other peoples and environs; but may leave them alone providing they do not violate our (mutual) habitat and freedom from association with them. The nations and regions of Europe can have a similar scale and be coordinated with those White states among the freely chosen Laboratory of The States as Bowery proposes for The U.S.  However, the European nations need to provide for the slightly different function of accountability to the deep ecology of their indigenous peoples. Irrespective of expanse or obstacles, sovereign White nations, regions, and states may be coordinated among the White Class.

Conclusion

When our advocates go on about “the Left, the Left, the Left”, on the one hand, they are obfuscating the agency of our greatest antagonist, the agency of Jewish machination, whether the agency behind economic Marxism or the cultural Marxism of PC. And on the other hand they are driving us right where Jewish academic and political planners want us to go – into the Right – which is the other source of our destruction – the Rightist quest for objective innocence, whether naive or worse, a pretense of objective innocence in order to avoid accountability. Not being leftists blocks resolution to our problem, a problem that Kant had tried and failed to solve, that of empiricism’s upshot, overly severe relativism – which is rectified by the hermeneutic process, classifying the ongoing process by which we gauge our systemic pattern, delimiting our relative interests, and particular accountability as The White Class.

When we say the White Class, meaning people of native European extraction, not Jews and Mulattos with Passports, there is no mistaking, no ambiguity. We are radicals, connecting the radix of our roots to the extremities of our branches, our farther reaches.

We need a moral order of that – our race, our class, is our religion – it centers on the 14 Words – it is transcendent, forward looking, palpable and practical.

We may declare our nation – This is the end of the one world order and the beginning of White sovereignty. Our DNA is our nation.

* * * * *

Note: When listening to our advocates, you might try, for your own clarity (and sanity) substituting the word “liberal”, in terms of its function, openness and caring for outsiders, when you hear them use the word, “left”, and you’ll find that it works fine conceptually. Liberalism’s actual negative meaning is more correct than leftism in terms of describing our problem – as a liberal, one is either naively subject to integrationism at the behest of an elitist group or subject to the integration of bio-power elitists – note that elite may have a positive connotation for some, but not elitism, elitists. It is true, however, that charging others with Liberalism tends to render one stodgy; backward sounding and worse; it poses the continual ground yielding, reactive logic of old-fashioned conservatism as its response. Thus, in line with Kurtagic’s marketing program of image appeal, another word for its meaning, i.e. reckless openness to other cultures, should be supplied – agreed, but not the Left.

Up Next

  • Women without class
  • Paradigms, Incommensurability an Addendum on Classification

The Stark Truth: Interview with James Traficant

November 18, 2011

Jim Traficant

In the first half, former US congressman (D-OH, 1985-2002) James Traficant talks about:

  • The criminal justice system;
  • Immigration;
  • The power of the Israel Lobby;
  • The economic debt crisis and his solutions to fixing it.

In the second half, Robert discusses:

  • New ways that the government is tracking you;
  • How Occupy Wall Street and the original Tea Party founders both opposed big corporations;
  • How Matt Taibbi exposes the lie that government is solely responsible for financial crisis rather than Wall Street.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 56 min.

Contact Robert:
robert_stark_la hotmail.com

Jamie Kelso: On Revilo Oliver

November 18, 2011

Revilo P. Oliver

Revilo Oliver is saluted in the October 1994 issue of Instauration magazine. Jamie Kelso starts his November 18, 2011 radio show with this tribute.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Jamie:
24.7keyboard@gmail.com

The European American Hour: Tribal Economics

November 17, 2011

Cover of TOQ, Fall_2011

Host Stan Hess discusses the importance of “tribal economics”. He comments on everyday ways to be economical and reads from the latest edition of the Occidental Quarterly on the failures of libertarianism for whites from the perspective of Brenton Sanderson and Dr. Kevin MacDonald.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Stan:
eamerica123 roadrunner.com

The Orthodox Nationalist: The Last Hetmans of Ukraine (1667-1803)

November 17, 2011

Danylo Apostol

Matt Johnson discusses:

  • The “eternal peace” between Russia and Poland;
  • The 1667 Treaty of Andrusovo;
  • The Haidamak Rebellion of 1768;
  • The suppression of Ukrainian trade and its economic consequences.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 56 min.

Contact Matt:
fr_raphael yahoo.com

Visit Matt’s VoR program page, for books, essays and articles.

Jamie Kelso: America Balkanized

November 17, 2011

Brent Nelson

In his Nov. 17, 2011 radio show Jamie Kelso covers Wilmot Robertson’s review of Dr. Brent Nelson’s “America Balkanized”.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Jamie:
24.7keyboard@gmail.com

The Mark Weber Report: The Injustice of the Nuremberg Trials

November 16, 2011

Scene from the Nuremberg trials

The Nuremberg Tribunal of 1945-46 — the most spectacular judicial enterprise in history — was meant to prove that the defeated German regime had been one of unique and monstrous deceit, rapaciousness and evil. But in fact the Tribunal dispensed not justice, but injustice. The four Allied powers that organized and ran it were themselves guilty of some of the very same crimes they accused the German defendants of having committed. The Tribunal was an illegal enterprise that operated on the basis of “ex post facto” law created after the fact expressly for the occasion, and which the Allies applied only to the defeated. The hangings of German leaders ordered by the Tribunal were little more than murders glossed over with a veneer of makeshift, hypocritical pseudo-legality.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 56 min.

Contact Mark Weber:
weber@ihr.org

The Stark Truth: Notes from Brett Stevens, Part 1

November 16, 2011

amerika_dot_org_logo

Robert discusses a written interview with Brett Stevens. Topics include:

  • How the rise of liberalism made an enemy out of nationalism & traditionalism
  • How diversity itself rather than its ingredients is the problem with multiculturalism;
  • The correlations between the fall of our modern civilization with the fall of empires throughout history;
  • How liberalism always targets the “favored” in order to promote its agenda—equality though distribution of wealth and crippling of ability;
  • How liberalism, egalitarianism, and anti-elitism share a common root in human psychology;
  • How the Left hijacked environmentalism and the need for deep ecology.

Brett Stevens‘s Web site is Amerika.org. He also writes for examiner.com as the Houston Conservative Examiner.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 56 min.

Contact Robert:
robert_stark_la hotmail.com

Jamie Kelso: Western Christianity

November 16, 2011

christmap

In his November 16, 2011 program Jamie Kelso comes across the article where Vic Olvir reveals the etymology of his pen name. Vic (for Viking it turns out) Olvir (the first Scandinavian pagan martyred by Christianity) writes brilliantly and appreciatively of Western Christianity in “Christianity: The Religion of the West”.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Jamie:
24.7keyboard@gmail.com

The Fighting Side of Me: The Distortions & Deceptions of Multiculturalism

November 15, 2011

Ari Ben Menashe and Arthur Porter

Paul Fromm discusses:

  • Protecting violent minorities — another crime “story” that tells us nothing;
  • Don’t shed any tears for the Somali pirates — bling-crazy, careless and heartless to their own people;
  • Uh-oh, another politically correct non-White appointee, Sierra Leone native Arthur Porter, must resign; head of watchdog over Canadian spies (CSIS) resigns as his connections to ex-Mossad agent and International gun runner Ari Ben Menashe exposed;
  • Why miscegenation is wrong.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Paul:
paul@paulfromm.com

Jamie Kelso: Instauration, July 1994, cont.

November 15, 2011

Instauration-1994-July

Jamie Kelso continues his discussion from the pages of the July 1994 issue of Instauration magazine, uploaded to the web for the first time this week. Flashes of insight into the life of the creator/editor of Instauration abound in every issue, and the July 1994 issue is no exception, with Wilmot Robertson’s description on page 21 of his first trip into his “larder” to discover, at age 79, that just about everything in his cupboard was festooned with the K’s and U’s that he had never noticed in all his brilliant years previous.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Jamie:
24.7keyboard@gmail.com

Jamie Kelso: Instauration, August 1994

November 14, 2011

Instauration-1994-August

VoR listeners are the first to see the just-uploaded August 1994 issue of Instauration magazine, whose timeless articles are the subject of Jamie Kelso’s November 14, 2011 radio show. Included is one of the best histories Kelso has ever seen of the Third World invasion of Canada.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Jamie:
24.7keyboard@gmail.com

The European American Hour: The White Narrative

November 10, 2011

Amanda Knox

Stan discusses the “Ongoing Campaign of Defamation worldwide and The White Narrative”. He focuses on the Edgar Steele, Amanda Knox, and Joe Paterno cases along with the story of Rasputin, Russia, and The Versailles Conference in the context of our White narrative.

Links to the recent Edgar Steele interview with a KXLY reporter: [1], [2], [3], [4].

The 7 minute part that actually aired on www.KXLY.com – here.

Cyndi says, “On the aired version, they read part of a statement that I emailed Melissa Luck just before the interview. I copy in the full statement I sent below, with the portion in red that they wouldn’t read on the air:

“I just want to state for the record, that my husband is innocent and I don’t say that blindly, because I, the government’s “alleged victim,” will not put my life at risk for anyone. The only people that have victimized me is the FBI, the prosecutors and the court. They have done nothing but lie and have run this case with nothing but judicial misconduct, including violating the 5th and 6th Amendments rights by invading his attorney-client privileges and then some. So, when they wrongly sentence my husband, they are wrongly sentencing me as well, by depriving me the rest of my life with my husband and destroying a family that was a happy, solid and loving before his wrongful arrest.

“They did put my full statement on line.”

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Stan:
eamerica123 roadrunner.com

The Orthodox Nationalist: Matt Johnson on the Antipodean Hour—Asceticism

November 10, 2011

Interior of Vatopedi on Mount Athos

Matt Johnson, appearing on the Antipodean Hour with Al Persohn on Oct. 1, 2011. Topics include:

  • Orthodox and Platonic metaphysics;
  • The metaphysics of asceticism;
  • The Greek Orthodox approach to nature.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 56 min.

Contact Matt:
fr_raphael yahoo.com

Visit Matt’s VoR program page, for books, essays and articles.

Jamie Kelso: Ron Paul Revolutionaries

November 10, 2011

Ron Paul

Host Jamie Kelso’s November 10, 2011 program leads him to reading off a Ron Paul position card that he took home from getting a chance to talk to Ron Paul in the thirteenth city in which he has met “the Thomas Jefferson of our time”. And as he is reading that the position card has as its photo image of Paul a picture of Paul at the podium before the 15,000 roaring Ron Paul Revolutionaries on September 2, 2008 in the Target Center in Minneapolis. And, to Kelso’s amazement, there he is, waving his own distinctive Ron Paul sign right at the foot of Paul’s podium in that photograph of an unforgettable event, a counter-convention staged on the same days as the Republican Convention just minutes away in St. Paul. The Target Center that Paul rented was as big as the Republicans’ Excel Energy Center, our crowd was just as big (15,000 each), but our shouting and energy were incomparably greater than the pall of knowing foreboding at the Republican event that chose John McCain rather than Ron Paul.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Jamie:
24.7keyboard@gmail.com

The Mark Weber Report: Israeli Deceit and Jewish-Zionist Power

November 9, 2011

Netanyahu-Obama

The French President recently called Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu “a liar” in a private conversation with President Obama that was overhead by journalists. “I cannot bear Netanyahu, he’s a liar,” Sarkozy said. Obama replied: “You’re sick of him, but I have to deal with him every day.” Behind this exchange is frustration over the routine deceit and arrogance of Israeli leaders, and the humiliation of bowing to Jewish-Zionist power. As the German Chancellor Konrad Adenauer once put it: “The power of the Jews, even today, especially in America, should not be underestimated.” This same power determines US policy in the Middle East. The new US ambassador to Israel, Daniel Shapiro, bluntly acknowledges that US policy in the region is driven by concern for Israel’s security and identity as a Jewish ethno-religious state — and not by what’s best for America and the world.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 56 min.

Contact Mark Weber:
weber@ihr.org

Jamie Kelso: 1965 Immigration Act

November 9, 2011

JohnsonSigns1965INSact

On November 9, 2011 Jamie Kelso talks about the Immigration Act of 1965, shown here being signed by Lyndon Johnson, with co-sponsors Emmanuel Celler and Ted Kennedy beaming with pride at the bill passed by 80% of the House and Senate which may have done more damage to the White race in America than any other legislation of our time.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Jamie:
24.7keyboard@gmail.com

The Stark Truth: Robert Lindsay on Race, Gender, Cultural, & Personality differences

November 9, 2011

Robert Stark interviews returning guest Robert Lindsay. Topics include:

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 56 min.

Contact Robert:
robert_stark_la hotmail.com

The Fighting Side of Me: Cutting through P.C. Mental Gumbo

November 8, 2011

Fromm, Tuttle, Martin

Candidate Samm Tuttle with Ray Martin, Alabama Council of Conservative Citizens and Paul Fromm, Nashville, T. November 5

Paul Fromm

  • … slams “Assistant Vice-President: Equity, Diversity and Inclusion” at Ryerson as a total waste of money;
  • … supports John Crosbie, Lieutenant-Governor of Newfoundland who’s being criticized for “inappropriate” joke about Muslem suicide bombers;
  • … skewers another Globe and Mail black crime story that tells us nothing;
  • … dissects supposed need for fast tracking “skilled” immigrants when Canada has 7.2% “official unemployment”;
  • … reveals exciting new long shot candidate for President Samm Tittle.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Paul:
paul@paulfromm.com

Jamie Kelso: The Nationalist Times, October 2011

November 8, 2011

Nationalist-Times-10-11281

Don Wassall’s “The Nationalist Times” for October 2011 is the starting point for Jamie Kelso’s October 8, 2011 radio show.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Jamie:
24.7keyboard@gmail.com

Bottom