Jamie Kelso: Instauration, Vol. 1, No. 1

November 30, 2011


Jamie Kelso’s November 30, 2011 radio show travels back in time to 1976. Back in 1976, 35 years ago, a giant in our cause, Wilmot Robertson, was in his prime at age 61. He had just started publishing the first volume of Instauration magazine. An obstectrician named Ron Paul was 41 years old that year, and getting himself elected to his first term in Congress. Completely wet behind the ears, a 28-year-old named Kelso was running for Congress too in 1976. Kelso’s goal was merely to get the John Birch Society-type platform that he espoused printed up in 600,000 copies of the Kansas City Star election guide supplement. 35 years later, the American Third Position party, at our NEW address of, is taking advantage of exactly such opportunities open only to political candidates to get our White common sense message out to large numbers of our countrymen.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Jamie:

The Stark Truth: Interview with Dylan Hales

November 30, 2011

Dylan Hales

Robert interviews Dylan Hales. Topics include:

  • Definition of “Left conservative“;
  • The phony Left/Right paradigm;
  • Our “crisis of bigness” and the need for decentralization;
  • Economic alternatives such as distributism and mutualism;
  • Building political coalitions and the potential barriers to doing so;
  • The importance of opposing the warfare state;
  • Mideast foreign policy, immigration, race relations, and the police state.

Dylan Hales is a writer from Charleston, SC, who has written for Taki Mag and has been a contributing editor for Young American Revolution. He blogs at the Left Conservative.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 56 min.

Contact Robert:

The Mark Weber Report: Ignorance and Arrogance of American Politicians

November 30, 2011

GOP Presidential Candidates Debate National Security Issues In Washington

A striking expression of the corruption of America’s social-political life is the ignorance and arrogance of its prominent politicians. The presidential candidates who addressed a recent “debate” in Washington, DC (with the notable exception of Ron Paul) showed that they lack principle, a coherent worldview, or a reality-based understanding of history. Along with empty “feel good” rhetoric about “American exceptionalism,” they also showed a craven pandering to Jewish-Zionist power. In any healthy and educated society, such individuals would be considered unfit for any position of authority or responsibility.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 56 min.

Contact Mark Weber:

The Fighting Side of Me: Fighting Back

November 29, 2011

David Duke

Paul Fromm:

  • … offers hints for fighting back against bankster arrogance and anti-plastic bag fanatics;
  • … praises author Robert Fulford for his comments that Canada’s multicultural policies enabled the honour killing of four Afghani women in Canada — bad ideas and delusions DO have consequences;
  • … rallies support for David Duke, arrested Nov. 25 in Cologne, and ordered deported from Germany. Protest to the German Embassy [4645 Reservoir Rd NW Washington, DC 20007, U.S.A. (202) 298-4000; you can email but to do so you must go on the embassy Web site];
  • … promotes the Marc Lemire free speech on the Internet case in Canadian Federal Court, Dec. 13-14.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Paul:

The Sunic Journal: Speech in London, Nov. 5, 2011

November 29, 2011

Tom Sunic

Tom Sunic gave a speech at a meeting of IONA / London Forum in London, Nov. 5, 2011. The speech was entitled “Ernst Juenger and the Balkanisation of Europe”.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 56 min.

Contact Tom:

Jamie Kelso: Tribesman Harold Bloom

November 29, 2011


In Kelso’s November 29, 2011 program, Wilmot Robertson points out the manner in which Tribesman Harold Bloom, an adept practitioner of the Culture of Critique, subverts our Western Canon of literature in his book “The Western Canon”. Bloom does this by absurdly inserting fellow Tribesmen (Freud, Kafka, and Proust) into HIS definition of the Western Canon, thereby turning it toward becoming THEIR “Western” Canon. This all happens on page 15 of the April 1996 issue of Instauration magazine.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Jamie:

The Heretics’ Hour: Our Money Culture vs a People Culture

November 28, 2011


We are being sold a bill of goods about this Euro crisis and European Union breakup. Looking behind the usual socialist rhetoric, we find it is just more anti-Nationalism by the predominantly Jewish banking-globalist-corporatist elite in their advance to control every last thing of value in the world and destroy national, ethnic and racial identity in the name of the god of money. Other topics covered:

  • Phony “neo-nazi’ terror scare in Germany;
  • Hanna Reitsch and the peaceful German glider plane industry;
  • Scam artists as radio talk show hosts and guests.

27 MB / 32 kbps mono / 1 hour 56 min.

Contact Carolyn:

Jamie Kelso: Mexicanization At Work

November 28, 2011


“Mexicanization At Work”, the cover story of the February 1996 issue of Instauration is the subject of Jamie Kelso’s November 28, 2011 radio show. The author quotes the fascinating fact that very few ethnic Mexicans resided in the U.S. in 1900: 70,000 in Texas; 14,000 in Arizona; 8,000 in California, 6,000 in New Mexico; and not even 500 ethinc Mexicans in any other state. Far fewer of these ethnic Mexicans were to be found in American States before then.And even these 1900 numbers of Mexicans, as small as they are, were far larger than they had been in earlier years. Texas, for example, with the most Mexican ethnics had had only 12,000 in 1860.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Jamie:

Women Without Class

November 26, 2011

By Daniel Sienkiewicz

Woolworth's sign

It was the ultimate Jewish perversion of terms — civil rights, freedom and discrimination — that culminated in the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Even a cursory glance over its statutes reveals obsolescence, disingenuousness and evil.

It does not take so much as a glance at its statutes. One goes into an American institution and reads a sign declaring, “discrimination on the basis of race, creed or gender is prohibited.” Suddenly seeing discrimination rendered pejorative, illegal even, one experiences a vague feeling of dread.

You sense immediately that you are being told not to have eyeballs. You are to be utterly defenseless against biological antagonists, to the destruction of that which is most important.

Even freedom of association, as it does not account for full processual development of those within the class, would not be sufficiently deep by itself, were it allowed. But while that objectivist, rational blindness of “civil rights” was bad enough, Jewish interests perverted its meaning to violate that freedom of association even, with the Civil Rights Act.

Wallace and Katzenbach

Deputy Attorney General Nicholas D. Katzenbach working alongside a Kennedy clan willing to sell out and open its country to catastrophic integration in order to gain power, along with a similarly disposed Lyndon B. Johnson, giving W. Bush a good run for worst president ever, sundry other Jews and objectivist Whites, oversaw departmental operations in desegregating the University of Mississippi in September 1962 and the University of Alabama in June 1963 – where he personally moved Governor Wallace aside to open the door for non-Whites; he also worked with Congress to ensure the passage of the Voting Rights Act and, with significant help from Emmanuel Celler, the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

Waiting at Woolworth's

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 made it unlawful for an employer to “fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions or privileges or employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.”

The ramifications of these prohibitions against discrimination were horrendous.

We have here in culmination, the ultimate in doublespeak terms: “civil rights” equals being told whose babies we have to pay for, with whom we must study (Brown vs. Board of Education), whose children we have to educate (with precious knowledge tortuously acquired), to whom we must rent, to whom we must sell, whom we must hire, and whom we must serve even in our private businesses – and this is called “freedom.”

Woolworth's sit-in counter

The related decision regarding the Woolworth’s Lunch Counter, telling a private business whom they must serve, was always one that caused my mind to glitch, even at a rather young age. M.L. King, with help from Jewish overlords organized Blacks and others, including a few no-class White women, such as Joan Trumpauer Mulholland, to “sit-in” at Woolworth’s and force a legal decision regarding desegregation of its lunch counters. The decision never made sense to me from the moment I heard about it – not in terms of anything that you can call freedom, anyway. Telling Woolworth’s whom they must serve, how, and whom they must hire – that is called “freedom”. It must be the Jewish definition. Yes, freedom marches, the freedom riders, civil rights – of course.

Mulholland and Dr. King

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 banned racial segregation “by businesses offering food, lodging, gasoline, or entertainment to the public.”

This would seem to be a clear violation of freedom, but Jews are skilled at promoting the self-destruction of others. Whites have been high on objectivism, and Blacks are hyper-assertive.

King and Malcolm X

Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were at the U.S. Capitol on March 26, 1964. Both men had come to hear the Senate debate on the bill. This was the only time the two men ever met.

It is a civil right and its opposite is called illegal discrimination punishable by law. Do not discriminate; do not see the terror you are confronted with; do not see that you are in something like a monkey cage, a planet of the apes (I can tell whether one has or has not been around many Blacks, depending upon their response).


In the article on Kant’s moral system, I mentioned a kind of anguish bordering on torture that I experienced when I was groping after a moral order. That anguish stemmed in large part from America’s rule structure, such as the rules of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, in combination with its demographic make-up. Having experienced more than enough of them through forced bussing to go to school with them, I was largely convinced that I did not want anything to do with Blacks. I assumed in my young age that it would be my prerogative one day, and that sane people would make the same choice. How could I believe that others, women even, could do other after seeing such things?

Riot in Newark

With Blacks rioting in Newark in the summer of 1967, my father’s generation repeating the “greatest generation” mantra ‘you can’t fight City Hall’, the Viet Nam War escalating unintelligibly so that no young person with a penis was immune from the draft, yes, I did have a certain yearning for the San Francisco version of that same summer of ‘67.

Beatle’s guitarist George Harrison did go there but came away with a bad impression of the Be-in. He saw these kids as hideously spotted and vacuum-cleaner faced. Of course, he had taken some bad L.S.D. From our perspective now, it does not seem like such a bad scene, certainly the better option in the tale of two cities, Newark and San Francisco 1967. No wonder I was a bit reluctant to let that go, particularly enchanting it was to me as a child. I was a little disappointed when traditional women and men would say that was “all nonsense” or “the source of our problems”; and I was disconcerted to experience similar antagonism from feminists particularly when the war had ended.

George Harrison - Summer of Love

While the dam had not burst through the 60s, 70s, or even into the early 80s, it was a period of ominous buildup, the implications of the rule structure and demographic make-up were pervasive and auguring catastrophic.

With the Civil Rights Act of 1964, “An employer cannot discriminate against a person because of his interracial association with another, such as by an interracial marriage.”

Newark Summer of Love

Great. You cannot discriminate against people that you do not like, whom you find immoral and dangerous.

Once the Viet Nam War had ended, feminism was rearing its ugly head (traditional women were rearing an ugly head too) while some of us men still had some need for being. I had just assumed that everyone would naturally reject forced integration and charges of “racism” but young women did not seem quite as inclined. Why?

interracial couple

Let’s qualify all statements made about young women below to mean, at their worst/most opportune, given defective social structure and pandering. It would be clearly wrong to say that there are not plenty of cool White women. (1)

Thesis: Within the disorder resulting from civil rights rupturing of classificatory (racial) bounds, the natural one-up position of young females (you are so wonderful, may I have a date?) emerges with increased significance.

a) Solicited from many directions, they typically become confirmed, articulate, confident and authoritative; let’s say sometimes beyond merit.

b) They have increased incentive to maintain their power as gatekeepers. With it, their natural tendency to incite genetic competition (E.O. Wilson) increases to runaway effect.

c) Jewish pandering and objectivist interests combine with de facto need to classify, strengthening high contrast tropism toward those classifications, females and Blacks, too difficult to ignore.

. . . . . . . . . .

interracial dating

Within the disorder resulting from civil rights rupturing of classificatory (racial) bounds, the natural one-up position of young females (you are so wonderful, may I have a date?) emerges with increased significance. Thus, a female bias and selective preferences will be over-valued and not sufficiently corrected by the many ameliorative aspects of the male selective bias.

a) Solicited from many directions.

Absent class bounds the one-up position of young White females re-emerges with increased significance. Occupying a more “addressive” position, they are solicited from many directions, becoming relatively confirmed, oriented, articulate, confident, and authoritative. A young man would make a mistake by trying to clarify the rules through meta-communication (orientative talk about how talk counts) as that is stepping on her toes as gate-keeper. And she can easily take many a brutal recourse should her position be disrespected, weaker sex and all of that. He can barely do anything right if that’s how she wants to see it. She can do many things, arbitrarily, and get away with it. This is why one ought to exercise some caution when denouncing anti-racism. Nevertheless, whereas one perhaps used to seek out a priest, a scientist or a philosopher, now because of her increased one up position, one might as soon seek out a young woman to talk in hopes of appealing to her and salvaging a human world.

b) Gate keeper position and genetic incitement multiplies

Whether it is civil rights of the objectivist kind, or the perverted Jewish kind of the 1964 Act, its rupturing of class bounds, developmental processes and accountability thereof, the natural tendency of young females to incite genetic competition (E.O. Wilson) increases to runaway effect. Particularly absent class bounds, young females have increased incentive to maintain the power of their position as gatekeepers, irrespective of race, to the detriment of the White Class.

Moreover, they will empower men who prevent discrimination and maintain the disorder in order to maintain the position as gate-keepers to the extent they have it; they will even empower men otherwise disposed to racial consciousness inasmuch as they pooh-pooh the issue of race and the merit of White advocates.

Since miscegenation is among their greatest weapons, the same old yin-yang is going to go into effect as they empower “objective men” to clear away White men of racial/class consciousness.

The yin-yang has been in effect as long as I can remember, with the Democrats representing integrationist, mulatto supremacism, and the Republicans representing the dolts that women and Jews can control as if they were trying to say, “We’re so tough; racial consciousness is all nonsense”.

Therefore, sometime within the initial interaction episode, a young man is likely to get a litmus test as she asks what he thinks of Blacks and of racism. If he is honest enough to say that he does not like them, sees good reason for racial discrimination, he is likely to be ostracized. In fact, since miscegenation is one of the biggest threats at her disposal in maintaining that position, she may go to extremes to stigmatize those who challenge it. Naturally, she will be particularly fearful and aggressive to maintain the anti-racist taboo once she has crossed that line. Hence, it is not only Jews and men attempting to be innocent who hazard the White Class.

I understand the paranoia of those who do not want to take their eye off the power, who think that they are trying to divide and conquer by lowly racial conflict; but if the formalities of incommensurate logics of meaning and action, of qualitative, paradigmatic difference are swept aside in favor of the false comparisons of “non-equalitarianism” and no critique is made of disingenuous female positions, the same old cycle is going repeat largely to our detriment.

Okay, men have been inarticulate to their mandate for being – me too, somewhat. Having asserted early on in the gender agendas article that male being was warranted through co-evolution, I later fumbled a bit, speculating that perhaps women would not allow for it – doesn’t matter: White Male Being is warranted through survival and our co-evolution with our women for 40,000 years. Innocent until proven guilty, we co-create these women and children Blacks do not.

Nevertheless, even though women and objectivist men are rupturing classification, Jews are not merely pandering objectively to natural inclination, they are instrumental in preventing corrective action.

c) Jewish pandering and objectivist interests combine with de facto need to classify.

Pandering to the addressive position of females, while not exclusive to Jews, is of especial significance coming from them. Powerfully organized as a class, historically threatened by Whites, Jews pander to this interface in order to weaken and demoralize the White class. Thus, they play upon the objectivist upshot of disorder. Like women, Blacks represent a difference, a tropism, too different to ignore within disorder despite prohibition of classifications; yielding a classification that grants them strength in solidarity and coherence. This is farther bolstered by endless Jewish stories of women as victims, women as heroes for advocating Blacks, Blacks in victim status; combining with the fact that Blacks are often emboldened by having less to lose; combining with the fact that Blacks are the opposite of being disadvantaged in some important respects; viz., long standing victimizers, exploiters of Whites and likely to have biological hegemonies, having evolved some 200,000 years prior to the 40,000 years of European differentiation. Not only that, but having evolved in a primordial disorder, their kind of selection has quantified and maxed-out masculinity, leaving females inclined to them and all the more; especially as the orienting organization of classifications are both prohibited and humanly necessary; thus, the high contrast tropism of Black White, as hard to ignore as Male/Female, is farther exacerbated; women pandered to in torrents by Jews on that interface to keep the class disordered and its morale down.


Therefore, despite obvious, broad destruction to the class, ecology and accountability, and despite would-be corrective action, as most White men naturally, and with good reason, hate miscegenating White women, the pairing with this aggressive, presumptuous, hyper-assertive people will increase, given the present rule structure. White men are prevented from doing anything about it largely due to the agency of Jewish machinations in interface with young females and objectivists within the disordered situation, absent racial classificatory bounds.

While Jews are not solely responsible for promoting miscegenation, they are largely so. Even more significantly, they are responsible for preventing White men from doing anything about it.

Civil Rights Act of 1964: “An employer cannot discriminate against a person because of his interracial association with another, such as by an interracial marriage.”

Civil rights rupture developmental processes and the ecological pattern disbursement that would otherwise be managed and maintained by the class. With equality/non-equality being made central, as opposed to classification and maintenance of paradigmatic differences that make a formal difference, incommensurate logics of meaning and action are improperly meshed to the detriment of marginal Whites, and liable to create the narcissism of false comparison, unnecessary competition, reciprocally escalating destruction.

For bringing to bear Black violence and destruction to the culmination of our 40,000 years of evolution, miscegenators and their instigators are no better; rather they are highly analogous to rapists and pedophiles; they might be considered accordingly. A scientistic view would say miscegenation is a naturally occurring fact. Rape and child molestation may be natural inclinations as well, but we do not accept them; rather we seek social injunction. In this example, the agency of a social constructionist view is superior to the mere causality of a scientistic view.

If people are going to keep going around making equality a straw man and non-equality the thing as opposed to paradigmatic difference(s) and race (class) being the matter, we’re going to create false comparisons and unnecessary, counter productive conflict; i.e., not that we should seek to avoid all conflict necessarily, but we do want the chips to fall on our side. (2)

White men are warranted to Be as the White Class is warranted to Be by dint of their survival and co-evolution over the course of 40,000 years. Innocent until proven guilty, we make White women and children. Moreover, males have an underrated selective bias, preferring cooperative and thoughtful woman (3). Even the asymmetry of White female beauty that White men have co-created is a sign of genetic advance and harmonious niche adaptation to environment.

Soda jerk making an ice cream, 1950-60's

Normal White men don’t create the unnecessary wars, aren’t the ones exploiting others with fortune 500 companies, are not the ones over populating the world. Nevertheless, White men who are in developmental stages, on basic motivational levels seeking being, are going to be out of luck absent the class bounds. Our White class is seeking Being as well. It is struggling to assert the warrant to exist. It is the righteous fight, but fight smart and look toward the power, White man.

Nevertheless, absent class bounds and subject to the throws of Jewish machinations, the large majority of White men are going to get screwed by those after “actualization” – like Malcolm X quoting Elijah Muhammad that the Black Man will rule – no thanks. The Black Power movement was after actualization and incommensurate with White male Being as well.

Malcolm X

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a rupturing of the White Class. After a laugh, cry or puke, settle down to see that it is evil.

Conclusion – Absent class bounds, women’s one-up position emerges with increased significance, often beyond merit. We need White women with White class. Civil rights rupture developmental processes within otherwise self-corrective patterns. Correction and advance requires the legitimacy of classification – The White Class.

* * * * *

(1) I love women, they are veritably my religion – 14 Words – especially in a racially homogeneous situation – though not as much in mixed one: With things being so foul, and their being so incredulous as to how I could be flustered over a rule structure and demographically mixed situation that was clearly auguring catastrophe, I had to think about it. While there are ways in which women can legitimately share power, many women, young in particular, do not merit the sort of power that they wield within the disordered context of modernity.

I am not promoting only traditional roles for women. Don’t you want more Virginia Abernethys? I do. It only requires the Class and that they undergo a bit more rigor on basic levels. Conversely, a bit more Being for men in exchange for maintaining the class – and it is warranted. White men’s existence warranted as is The White Class.

(2) In fact, encouraging the natural animosity that Black women have toward White women taking Black men is a good angle, not only in discouraging such pairings, but also in agitating to bring the Jewish system down which is so uncaring, having broached our most sacred and important human concern, our close personal relationships as they bear upon our survival. The beaming smiles of approval that I have received from Black women in those times when I antagonized interracial couples is an irony that stays with me. The “sisters” (Black women) obviously will not care too much about the White women who take their men. White men do not want Black women; we sense that it is going horribly backwards: their ugly symmetry a sign of primitive undifferentiation, imperviousness to environment and social concerns, dispensation to thoughtless overgrazing. I find it relatively effective to agree with interracial couples that Black women are indeed, ugly. It tends to confuse them as the insulted party is not there; after all, what is he doing with a White woman if Black women are so great? (obviously, exercise discretion – you may not want to say “ugly”, you might best say nothing in some cases). If they will, let these enraged Black women be allies in taking down the Jewish system {which has broached our most sacred, our close personal relationships – its total disregard for that which is most important to us, our co-evolutionary women. Nevertheless, when listening to David Duke interview Patricia McAllister, what struck me was her claim that Blacks ought to have half of America. Do you see what I mean by hyper-assertive? For all the money and treasures they have taken form us, the destruction wrought upon us, they should have half of America… hmm.

(3) As opposed to the female/Nietszchean perspective which values men big and strong exclusively, impervious and undaunted no matter what, Negroes with good digestive tracts. That may explain why the N word is prohibited by the female gate keeper’s union – the N word is not ok, but Himmler was well reasoned in wanting to genocide Poles – after all, the women are beautiful; we cannot have that when Black women have the humility to be so non-threatening – so often butt ugly.

The Stark Truth: Notes from Brett Stevens, Part 2

November 25, 2011


Robert Stark discusses part two of a written interview (part 1, part 2) with Brett Stevens. Topics include:

  • Futurist traditionalism—how conservatism is about learning from the past and nature and why modern conservatives fail to do so;
  • How America is a type of civilization rather than a place
  • How immigration is class warfare that causes racism;
  • US foreign policy;
  • The sociosexual marketplace.

Brett Stevens‘s Web site is He also writes for as the Houston Conservative Examiner.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 56 min.

Contact Robert:

Jamie Kelso: Instauration, June 1996

November 25, 2011


In his November 25, 2011 radio show Jamie Kelso dials the time machine back 15 years to the June 1996 issue of Instauration magazine, here, in which Wilmot Robertson’s writers urge all of us to “get on the Internet”. Ironically, Instauration magazine itself would not get on the Internet until the two-year-long (so far) project that we are engaged in at to transfer every word and image of the best White patriot magazine ever produced to what the 1996 Instauration writers called “the WWW” in that key article.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Jamie:

The European American Hour: The Secret Life of Barack Hussein Obama

November 24, 2011

A Russian Newscaster Salutes Obama

Stan reads from the recently published book, The Secret Life of Barack Hussein Obama. Pictured: A Russian newscaster who appears not to like Obama.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Stan:

The Orthodox Nationalist: Saint Irenaeus of Lyons

November 24, 2011

Saint Irenaeus of Lyon

Matt Johnson discusses:

  • St. Ireneaus and the ancient Orthodox tradition;
  • The development of scripture and tradition;
  • How scripture by itself is insufficient.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 56 min.

Contact Matt:

Visit Matt’s VoR program page, for books, essays and articles.

The Mark Weber Report: How Important Is the Constitution?

November 23, 2011

US Constitution

Many Americans believe that our country’s problems could be solved, at least in large measure, by “restoring” the “constitutional republic” and by “returning” to the letter and spirit of the US Constitution. But no constitution, even the most brilliantly written one, can save a society from corruption, ignorance, disorder, and poverty. What is crucial in determining the level of prosperity, education, orderliness and culture in a society is not its constitution, but rather the character, quality and values of its people, and especially its leaders. For many years now the US Supreme Court, reflecting the interests, agenda and ideology of those who hold power, has “interpreted” the Constitution to validate the programs and policies it likes — in blatant violation of the document’s original spirit and plain meaning. Few Americans realize just how undemocratic the “original” Constitution was, and how distrustful its authors were of power by “the people.” While the US Constitution is brilliantly conceived, it has major defects. It failed in the most serious crisis in US history: the Civil War. Now it’s little more than an instrument of those in power to provide a veneer of legality in furthering their interests and agenda.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 56 min.

Contact Mark Weber:

The Stark Truth: RAMZPAUL Tames the Shrew

November 23, 2011

RAMZPAUL Tames the Shrew

Robert Stark and returning guest RAMZPAUL discuss:

  • The taming of the feminist shrew [warning: some vulgar language];
  • Herman Cain, sex and nationalism;
  • So-called “Amazing Atheist” sticks a banana up his rectum;
  • Republicans urge war with Iran, ignore the real war to be waged at home.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 56 min.

Contact Robert:

Jamie Kelso: Instauration, April 1996

November 23, 2011

Pat Buchanan, as seen by Wilmot Robertson in the pages of the April 1996 issue of Instauration, is the subject of Jamie Kelso’s November 23, 2011 show.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Jamie:

The Fighting Side of Me: The Truths from Our Side

November 22, 2011

Paul Fromm:

  • … praises Ron Paul’s immigration policy (as far as it goes) — more border agents, no more “anchor babies”, no more welfare rights for illegals;
  • … recounts historian David Irving’s talk at the Barnes Review Potomac River Cruise, Nov. 16: “How America Was Dragged into Churchill and Stalin’s War Against Germany”;
  • … discusses how Churchill’s deal with the Zionists dragged the U.S. into a world war for the second time in a row.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Paul:

Jamie Kelso: The Rosenbergs

November 22, 2011


In his November 22, 2011 radio show Jamie Kelso enjoys Wilmot Robertson’s “In Defense of Nordicism” essay which now appears online in the December 1995 issue of Instauration at In the same issue, the great mind writing under the pen name of Nathan Bedford Forrest writes brilliantly about the Venona Cables, which proved many years after the fact that Chosenites, like Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, have waged unrelenting war against America’s White people.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Jamie:

The Heretics’ Hour: European Debt Enslavement Vindicates Hitler

November 22, 2011

Stacks of new euros
The euro built on a foundation of debt and trickery?

William Finck and Carolyn discuss the causes and implications of the latest crises enveloping the Euro because of the overwhelming indebtedness of European Union members such as Greece, Italy, Spain and Portugal. The remedies being suggested to hold the European Union together with a common currency constitute the total loss of sovereignty of individual nation states. Who will benefit from this? The bankers and global corporations, of course. In addition, “neo-nazi extremism” is being focused upon as the real threat to the European way of life … as in the Zwickaur “terror” group, made up of only three people! Finck and Carolyn rightly question which is more dangerous, the bankers or the young “nazis.”

William Finck’s website is

27 MB / 32 kbps mono / 1 hour 56 min.

Contact Carolyn:

Jamie Kelso: The Lesson of Rhodesia

November 21, 2011


On November 21, 2011 Jamie Kelso continues the tour through the newly-uploaded issues of Instauration magazine. Today’s show features an excellent article in the November 1994 Instauration entitled “The Lesson of Rhodesia”. A remarkable fact is that the black population of Rhodesia was estimated at 100,000 in 1890. Today that black population, thanks to the benefits of White science, agriculture, and medicine, is now 12,000,000. The White population, which peaked at 280,000, is now almost vanished.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Jamie: