The Stark Truth: Interview with Patrick McCarthy

September 21, 2011


Topics include:

  • Patrick’s political views;
  • His take on White nationalism and the movement’s position on Jews;
  • Political apathy, the two party monopoly and the need for alternatives, special interest, and the Left’s abandonment of the working class;
  • The environment and how it relates to immigration;
  • Animal rights;
  • The drugging of society;
  • Robert Lindsay’s article about sexual relations between men and women.

Patrick McCarthy is an anti-racist White preservationist who blogs at Seed of Japeth.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 56 min.

Contact Robert:

Jamie Kelso: Beyondism

September 21, 2011

Raymond B. Cattell

On September 21, 2011 Jamie Kelso discusses psychologist Raymond B. Cattell’s book “Beyondism – Religion from Science”, specifically Chapter 15 which deals with Genetic Social Policies.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Jamie:

The Fighting Side of Me: Rejecting False Beliefs and Phony “Heroes”

September 20, 2011

MLK Memorial Statue

Paul Fromm:

  • Reports on the super successful Practical Politics Seminar: Non-Voting Politics and 21st Century Verbal Tactics For Anyone White and Normal held in East Tennessee of Sep. 17;
  • Explains how to reach the 30% of people ready to consider evidence that challenges their preconceived beliefs;
  • Reveals approaches to freeing our brothers and sisters from debilitating White guilt;
  • Exposes Martin Luther King statue made in Red China and erected by Chinese workmen — insult to all Americans on many levels;
  • Reminds Americans to phone Congressmen to back H.R. 2885 — e-verify — to crack down on illegals and shift 11-million jobs to unemployed Americans.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Paul:

Jamie Kelso: Madeleine Albright & Hillary Clinton

September 20, 2011

Maps of Israel and Palestine

On September 20, 2011 Jamie Kelso talks about his encounter with the hideous Madeleine Albright (both made-up names designed to fool gullible Whites into thinking that “Albright” might be a White person) and Hillary Rodham Clinton at the 2008 Bilderberg meeting in Chantilly, Virginia. This dynamic duo of an insider Jewess and the outer circle White renegade Clinton are back in the news on September 20 as they both are in the news today telling the Israel Lobby lie that they are “for a two-state solution” between Israel and the dispossessed Palestinians. The cant phrase “two-state solution” is code talk for the “one state solution” of relentless taking of Palestinian land by Israeli “settlers”.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Jamie:

The Heretics’ Hour: The Pitfalls of Internet Radio

September 19, 2011

Internet radio-on air

Carolyn goes a little off-theme tonight to present her “counter-attack” to Charles Giuliani since he continues to misrepresent her on his own Internet radio program. Behind the hullabaloo is what appears to be a major agenda to prevent any re-consideration of the role of Adolf Hitler in history. It is rather mystifying why so many Internet radio hosts jump on the bandwagon of portraying the National Socialists as Jews, Zionists and betrayers of Germany and the West. Is Internet alternative radio heavily infiltrated by Jewish interests? This is a question that should be taken more seriously than it is.

27 MB / 32 kbps mono / 1 hour 56 min.

Contact Carolyn:

Jamie Kelso: Instauration, Jun. & Jul. 1992

September 19, 2011

The June and July 1992 issues of Instauration cover the critical 1992 referendum in which 2/3 of White South Africans were largely duped, by renegade White politicians, an enemy-controlled press, and their churches, and boycotting White nations into voting FOR continuation of the “negotiations” which led to a 1994 election in which six million White South Africans would for the first time lose sovereignty over their own nation. Kelso’s September 19, 2011 radio show is based on this reporting from South Africa in the pages of Instauration at that time.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Jamie:

Ludwig F. Clauss: Racial Style, Racial Character (Part 2)

September 17, 2011

By Tom Sunic

Ludwig F. Clauss (1892-1974)
Ludwig F. Clauss (1892-1974)

Continuing from Part 1 with a translation of parts of the third edition (1943) of Rasse und Seele, by Ludwig F. Clauss.

“To each according to his kind, to each according to his style”

The movement of the body is the expression of the movement of the soul. This can best be seen in the interplay of facial muscles and in the gestures of the arms and hands with which the speaker accompanies his speech. Why is he moving his hands in such a way and why not differently?  Because the special way of his spiritual alertness will also determine the way his hands move. The style of spiritual movement determines the style of the bodily movement.

Here is a little example from day to day life that illuminates this matter. Who is more gifted to drive a motor vehicle, the Nordic man or the Mediterranean man? This question is also meaningless. Neither “the” Nordic man is endowed with this or that, nor is “the” Mediterranean man. There are many individuals of both races who are gifted to drive a car. If that’s the case, then the Nordics do that in a Nordic way and it is precisely by this that they are recognizable as Nordics.

The same goes for the Mediterranean who does it in the Mediterranean way. And it is precisely by this that he can be recognized. And this is how these two styles differ. The Mediterranean driver is the master of the moment: he is always there, always in perfect instantaneity. He drives with an abrupt change at lightning speed and at a sharp curve he yields and slams on the brakes with instantaneous effect — the more dangerous the driving, the more impressive is his game. At this stage the Nordic man is not comparable—not because he is a bad driver, but because the laws of his mental and physical movement compel him to a different driving style.

The Nordic man does not live in the world as it is; he lives always in the world as it will be. He is not the master of the instant, but rather the master of the distance. He is not cutting suddenly into the curve; he bends the curve. For him turning is “nice” if it can be predicted and then, if possible, played down. The Mediterranean driver loves surprise: only in it he can prove to be the master of the moment. The Nordic driver anticipates always ahead of the coming event, even a possible coming event. In this way he provides for himself some preplanned traffic regulations for all possible cases, which would likely irritate the Mediterranean driver, perhaps more so than it would make the driving easier for him. For the driver of the Mediterranean type there is no relief if the thrill of surprise is missing.

The third fallacy of L’Osservatore Romano is the allegation that the German people are equated with the Nordic race, whereas the Italian people are equated with the Mediterranean race. Although this is not explicitly mentioned it is tacitly suggested. The German people are composed of several races, where, of course, the Nordic race predominates. But there is also different blood among the German people, as for example, the Mediterranean blood. Likewise, the Italian people are also a mixture of several races, of which — at least in the southern part of the peninsula — the Mediterranean race predominates. But there is also different blood among the Italian people, such as Nordic blood. It is by no means true that these two peoples are separated by sharp racial boundaries; they have a good deal more in common in their blood.

This blood relationship stretches into the earliest Roman times and has been renewed many times ever since. And in both cultures, in the Germanic, as well as in the Roman, the play and counter-play of the Nordic and the Mediterranean operate; except that each culture shows different results. The Roman is older, whereas the Germanic is younger. Which one is worth more, the older or the younger? This question also seems to be wrongly put.

The attempt, to sow distrust between friendly nations, by suspecting German racial policies, can no longer be valid. Every step in the field of international politics and colonial politics confirms the findings of the psychology of race and proves it with practical usefulness when dealing with other types of people. Thegoal (of race psychology) is not to separate peoples, but to connect peoples insofar as it establishes between one type and the other a scientifically based mutual understanding. [Emphasis in text.]

The Gestalt: Psycho-Racial Anthropology

Clauss introduced new concepts, often using words and compound nouns that up until then had been nonexistent in the study of race. When translated today, these words may lend themselves to dangerous conceptual manipulations, which in turn, liberal masters of discourse will quickly label as “racist.”

This is generally the case with the German language, a stupendously rich language known for its numerous inflections. Very often Clauss uses the term ‘Gestalt’ when providing racial typologies, a word which in English can be translated as ‘shape’ or ‘form’. However, in the German language and depending on the subject matter, ‘Gestalt’, when used from the nationalist and politically conservative point of view, may refer to aesthetic and cultural perfection in the description of high forms of Western civilization. The German term ‘Gestalt’ was very popular in Germany in the first half of the 20th century, not just in the realm of race but also in other fields, such as literature and philosophy. Clauss’s contemporaries, the German philosopher of history, Oswald Spengler, or the novelist and essayist  Ernst Jünger, two scions of the pre-WWII “revolutionary-conservative intellectual revolution,” often used the term ‘Gestalt’ as a normative reference to aesthetic and political magnificence and as a radical opposite to the dreaded liberal–communist formless system permeated by the process of uglification and decadence.

Clauss’s focus on racial style and form, which he calls ‘Gestalt’, must not be confused with the school of psychology, known as “Gestalt psychology” that developed among some liberal German psychologists in the mid- 20’s—a school, that downplayed the racial factor.

For Clauss and for many racialist scholars of his time, every racial type and every racial subtype represents objective reality differently. Hence, there is no absolute truth but only a specific apprehension of the truth based on the individual’s own psycho-racial make-up.

Because everything that happens here — the way somebody looks at us, the way he behaves, or the way how he acts, that is to say, all living things altogether — have their racial traits.  A treasure trove of such fruitful examples is provided by history. One, of these motives in Germanic life, repeatedly mentioned by Tacitus, is “loyalty”, which is in contrast to the no less effective violation of Germanic loyalty: treason. ( Rasse und Seele, pp. 38–39)

Race is by no means only a physical expression relegated to a given spot on Earth, such as for instance the assumption that only the geographic areas of Scandinavia must house Nordic peoples. Clauss rejects the idea that racial anthropology must always match racial psychology. There are many individuals who can have Nordic physical traits (phenotype) but whose behavior is un- Nordic:

Some people understand this word as if the race (Nordic) can only be found in northern Germany. Both of it is not the meaning of the description “the Nordic race.” The Nordic race is also a creator and a carrier of the German spirit in southern parts of the German national territory, whereas in other parts of northern Germany – similar to the Scandinavian lands (except for Nordic blood), live also non-Nordic races. A definition, which could be useful in psychology, will acquire the denomination “Nordic” only when we manage to demonstrate the connection between the Nordic landscape and the lifestyle of that race. A psychologist should denominate races only according to the pattern which the process of his research brings under his eyes. To investigate into the psychology of races means first and foremost to discern the meaning of its bodily form (Gestalt). This meaning, however, can only be understood from its psychological form (Gestalt). (Rasse und Charakter, 1942, p. 43; emphasis in text).

This proves once again that the idea of national identity and nationality at large cannot be automatically equated with the extent to which one embodies a racial archetype. The following four photos illustrate three different German types and a Jewish type:

Schleswig woman

1. German woman from Schleswig. Predominately Nordic. Eye expression shows inborn sense of the tragic.

Westphalia woman

2. German woman from Westphalia. The “acquired” smile is typically “Germanic,” yet facial features and the shape of her nose show a sharp “Alpine” (“ostisch”) streak.

German Jewish woman

3. German born Jewish woman. Mixture of Sephardic and Ashkenazi facial traits. Her smile shows “acquired” ( mimicked ) restraint.

Tyrolian woman

4. A very tall German woman from the German speaking region of South Tyrol (northern Italy) (Mediterranean and Alpine streak). The lips alignment and the eyebrows configuration are common for the Dinaric race.

Clauss’s books have therefore a twofold purpose. He demolishes the liberal propagandistic lie that racial awareness means White man’s exclusion of non-Whites, carried through by an alleged blond German beast. Instead, his books teach us that it is precisely when admitting our racial and sub-racial differences, both in style and in character, that interracial hatred can be avoided. Moreover, his works are important insofar as they can be a good lesson for many troubled White nationalists who assume that their well-proportioned body must give them a certificate for bizarre, illicit, or criminal behavior. Who among us have not encountered self-congratulatory White conmen or White lowlifes whose behavior does more harm to the research on race than the palaver of all leftists and antiracists combined? Similar to his colleague Julius Evola, Clauss is aware that some White man may have a perfect race of the body, but whose race of the spirit may be mongrelized to monstrous proportion.

’Artrecht’ (“Being of his own kind”; of his in- group) is not a synonym for being “racially pure” in the original sense of the word.  Here we can see the difference between the “raciality” (‘Rassigkeit’) of man and the “raciality” of animal.  If somebody is racially pure, he is not automatically a man of his kind (‘artrecht’). To be Nordic, for example, does not have to mean to be a good man or a noble man. Not every Nordic man embodies Nordic values.  A man of the Nordic style can also be a crook or a criminal. A Nordic miscreant differs from a Mediterranean, Alpine, or a Middle Eastern miscreant as clearly as a righteous Nordic man differs in this sense from righteous people of these races. Both of them, the righteous man and his negative mirror-image, the miscreant, are bound by the same ethical laws respectively. With one exception: the one abides by it, the other breaks it. Pure heroes and pure crooks are rare; among all of us simmers a temptation to commit, at least once, an outrage against things that we consider right. Not that the race changes in us when we follow this temptation; only our racial system of value is disturbed. Race is race; in good and in bad. And the law remains the law even when it is infringed. (Rasse und Charakter, p. 78).

Clauss’s books are important because they delve into the hidden corners of human behavior as determined by race. His field of research may be labeled “psycho-racial anthropology,” a field which has been rejected for over a half a century by Freudian-Marxian scholars.  As long as the mystique of egalitarianism runs full steam in Western society — be it under the guise of Christian “love thy neighbor,” or under the label of the more secular liberal avatars like the “multicultural consensual society” — any serious effort to combat the danger of the multiracial experiment will be futile. Only when the current dominant ideas are successfully intellectually challenged, will the whole fraud of multicultural promiscuity fall apart overnight.

Tom Sunic (Web sites: [1], [2]) is an author ([1], [2]), translator, former US professor of political science, and former Croat diplomat. He is also a member of the Board of Directors of the American Third Position and a VoR radio host. Email him.

The Stark Truth: Interview with Reuben Hayat

September 16, 2011

Robert interviews Reuben Hayat. Topics include:

Reuben Hayat is a Jewish pro-white advocate who blogs at

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 56 min.

Contact Robert:

The European American Hour: Interview with Virginia Abernethy

September 15, 2011

Stan and Dr. Virginia Abernethy discuss relations between our men and women and how that effects our community.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Stan:

The Orthodox Nationalist: 9/11; John the Baptist; Human Vice

September 15, 2011

The beheading of John the Baptist

Matt Johnson discusses:

  • John the Baptist as revolutionary;
  • John as the summation of the prophetic message;
  • John against the Talmud;
  • The murder of John.

Note: Dr. Johnson wishes to make one correction. In the second segment, the daughter of Herod’s wife is incorrectly identified as Heriodias. In fact, it is Herod’s wife who was Herodias. Herod’s wife’s daughter was Salome.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 56 min.

Contact Matt:

Visit Matt’s VoR program page, for books, essays and articles.

Jamie Kelso: Instauration, May 1995

September 15, 2011


Jamie Kelso’s radio material on September 15, 2011 comes from the May 1995 issue of Instauration magazine.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Jamie:

The Mark Weber Report: Firebombing Hamburg, Pearl Harbor and 9/11

September 14, 2011

Hamburg raid, 1943

Putting 9/11 in historical perspective, Weber takes a look at terrorism in history. He compares and contrasts the 9/11 horror with the 1941 Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, and the British-American fire-bombing of Hamburg in July 1943, which took the lives of 40,000 civilians. Weber compares how Americans marked the tenth anniversary of the Pearl Harbor attack with the tenth anniversary remembrance of 9/11, and explains why the national commemorations have been so different.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 56 min.

Contact Mark Weber:

The Stark Truth: Interview with George P. Stimson, Jr.

September 14, 2011

Robert interviews George P. Stimson, Jr. Topics include:

George P. Stimson, Jr. writes on ecology, environmentalism and “radical naturalism” at Counter Currents Publishing. His blog is

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 56 min.

Contact Robert:

Jamie Kelso: The Lesson of Rhodesia

September 14, 2011

Rhodesia Herald UDI

For the September 14, 2011 Jamie Kelso show, Kelso refers to “The Lesson of Rhodesia” that is the cover story of the November 1994 issue of Instauration magazine. The author asks the question that is pertinent now: how did 250,000 Rhodesian Whites remarkably succeed for so long in their effort to “band together to preserve that most priceless possession, (their) inheritance of European blood”? And, then how was that success lost by internal dissenssion among we Whites ourselves?

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Jamie:

The Fighting Side of Me: Sorting Out Reality

September 13, 2011

Shi Rong

Paul Fromm:

  • Warns amorous Tory MP, Bob Deckert, about chasing Xin Hua reporter cutie, Shi Rong. Xin Hua news agency fronts for Red Chinese intelligence;
  • Hammers UNICEF for feeding over-breeding Somalis today who will expand their population and fuel the next famine;
  • Exposes another multicultural “success story”– Ayelech Zenebek Ejigu, the Ethiopian killing machine.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Paul:

Jamie Kelso: The “Majority Strategy”

September 13, 2011

NPI press conference

On September 13, 2011 Jamie Kelso talks about the “Majority Strategy” as presented by James Edwards, Richard Spencer, and Jared Taylor at the September 9 National Press Club briefing that they gave to announce the September 10 National Policy Institute (NPI) conference the next day. Four American Third Position Board of Directors Members made presentations or presented materials at the Sept. 10 event: James Edmards, Tom Sunic, Matt Parrott, and Alex Carmichael.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Jamie:

The Heretics’ Hour: Immigration, Race and IQ

September 12, 2011

US census race map

Carolyn speaks out on alternative radio hosts and web sites that preach a mixed message. Other topics include:

  • Non-white Immigration has to be considered the #1 threat to traditionally white, European nations;
  • Race and IQ are not shameful subjects and should be brought up in polite company;
  • Demographic balance in U.S. tipped in favor of non-whites;
  • Lebensborn program and Norwegian-German “war-children;”
  • Austrian Gerd Honsik released from prison, returns to Spain;
  • Elie Wiesel in Buchenwald proved a fraud.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 1 hour 57 min.

Contact Carolyn:

Jamie Kelso: Shockley on Eugenics and Race

September 12, 2011

Shockley on Eugenics and Race

On September 12, 2011 Jamie Kelso talks about Nobel Laureate William Shockley’s 1992 book, edited by anthropologist Roger Pearson, “Shockley on Eugenics and Race”. This excellent book is the cover story of the February 1994 issue of Instauration magazine, which will soon be put online by Kelso.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Jamie:

Lessons of 9/11: Looking Back, and Ahead

September 11, 2011

WTC twin towers on 9/11

By Mark Weber

On September 11, 2001, for the first time ever, terror attacks from the sky struck America with horrific, devastating suddenness.

The perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks meant to harm the United States. But the response to those attacks by President George W. Bush and other American political leaders has proven to be even more harmful. The U.S. response has weakened this country’s security, undermined its economy, degraded its standing and credibility, and violated the principles it claims to uphold.

In the aftermath of 9/11, the President and other prominent Americans lied about a crucial aspect of the attacks: the motive. Along with much of the media, Bush and other political leaders promoted the “Big Lie” that the September 11 attacks were entirely unprovoked and unrelated to U.S. policy and actions.

On national television President Bush said that “America was targeted for attack because we’re the brightest beacon for freedom and opportunity in the world.” The next day he said that “freedom and democracy are under attack,” and that the perpetrators had struck against “all freedom-loving people everywhere in the world.” But if “democracy” and “freedom-loving people” were the targets, why didn’t the perpetrators attack Switzerland, Japan or Norway?

In fact, it’s clear that the men who carried out the 9/11 suicide attacks against centers of American financial and military might were motivated, at least in large measure, by rage over U.S. air strikes and economic warfare against Muslim and Arab countries, and by anger over decades-long U.S. support for Israel and its policies of aggression and brutal occupation against Arabs and Muslims.

The U.S. government’s official report on 9/11, issued in 2004, skirted the question of motive. Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, the two most senior officials of the commission that issued the report, later explained in a memoir: “This was sensitive ground. Commissioners who argued that al-Qaeda was motivated primarily by a religious ideology – and not by opposition to American policies – rejected mentioning the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in the report. In their view, listing U.S. support for Israel as a root cause of al-Qaeda’s opposition to the United States indicated that the United States should reassess that policy.”

The terror of 9/11 was predictable because it was not unprecedented. In 1993, for example, Islamic radicals set off a bomb at the World Trade Center that claimed six lives. In August 1998 the United States carried out missile attacks against Afghanistan and Sudan, strikes that senior Clinton administration officials said signaled the start of “a real war against terrorism.” In the wake of those attacks, a high-ranking U.S. intelligence official warned that “the prospect of retaliation against Americans is very, very high.”

In the aftermath of 9/11, President Bush pledged a “crusade,” a “war against terrorism,” and a “sustained campaign” to “eradicate the evil of terrorism.” His successor, President Barack Obama, has continued the campaign. But such calls have sounded hollow given the U.S. government’s own record of support for terrorism. For example, American presidents have warmly welcomed to the White House Israeli prime ministers, such as Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir, with well-documented records as terrorists.

Following 9/11, Jewish and Zionist leaders, and their American supporters, lost no time exploiting the national mood of fear, rage and revenge to press for new U.S. military action against Israel’s many enemies. U.S. government officials, with important backing in the media, claimed that Iraq’s Saddam Hussein regime had supported the perpetrators of 9/11. On the basis of this and other equally baseless allegations, the U.S. launched an illegal and unnecessary war against Iraq.

However justified the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 may have been as a response to 9/11, the subsequent U.S. bombing, invasion and occupation of Iraq certainly was not. The key motive behind the U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq was not the official one.

Whatever the secondary reasons for the war, the crucial factor in President Bush’s decision to attack was to help Israel. With support from Israel and America’s Jewish-Zionist lobby, and prodded by Jewish “neo-conservatives” holding high-level positions in his administration, President Bush – who was already fervently committed to Israel – resolved to invade and subdue one of Israel’s chief regional enemies. This was so widely understood by Washington insiders that U.S. Senator Ernest Hollings was moved in May 2004 to acknowledge that the U.S. invaded Iraq “to secure Israel,” and “everybody” knows it.

Nearly 3,000 people perished in the September 11 attacks, but more Americans have been killed in the wars launched by the U.S. in the aftermath of 9/11. More than 4,000 U.S. military personnel have lost their lives in Iraq, and more than a million Iraqis (by some accounts) have died, directly or indirectly, because of the war.

For most Americans, modern war has largely been an abstraction — something that happens only in far-away lands. The victims of U.S. air attack and bombardment in Pakistan, Vietnam, Lebanon, Iraq and other distant countries have seemed somehow unreal. Few ordinary Americans pay attention because U.S. military actions normally have little impact on their day-to-day lives.

Madeleine Albright, Secretary of State in President Clinton’s administration, spoke in a memorable 1996 interview about the cost in human life of the sanctions imposed on Iraq by the U.S. during the 1990s. During the interview she was asked: “We have heard that half a million children have died [as a result of sanctions against Iraq]. I mean, that is more children than died in Hiroshima … Is the price worth it?” Albright replied: “ …We think the price is worth it.”

One positive consequence of the shock of 9/11 has been to encourage many more Americans to question official claims and re-think entrenched assumptions about their government’s arrogant “policeman” role in the world. Many more Americans have come to understand how political leaders of both parties have subordinated American interests, and basic justice and humanity, to Jewish-Zionist interests.

In the years since 9/11, there’s been no change in the basic character of U.S. foreign and military policy, in spite of a flurry of high hopes for change when Barack Obama became president. As a result, distrust and hatred of the United States around the world have persisted.

The calamity of September 11 was a consequence, above all, of the Jewish-Zionist grip on American political life and the U.S. media. Enduring security will therefore remain elusive as long as U.S. policy, especially in the Middle East, is set by a small but very influential minority with its own agenda and strong ethno-religious ties to a key protagonist in the region.

Real security for America will require radically different policies based on clear-eyed awareness of authentic American national interests and enlightened concern for the long-term good of the U.S. and the world.

Source: IHR.

The Stark Truth: Matt Parrott on Politics and Strategy

September 9, 2011

Matt Parrott discusses his debate with VNN in regards to approach to the Jewish issue. Other topics include:

  • The problem of parasitic elites and solutions;
  • Upcoming elections, Ron Paul, and Matt Parrott’s involvement with the A3P;
  • Matt’s writings at and men’s issues;
  • Thoughts on White genocide.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 56 min.

Contact Robert: