The Heretics’ Hour: The Roosevelt Legacy on World History

November 29, 2010

FDR after signing Japan war declaration

FDR at ease and pleased after signing war declaration against Japan, 1941. Enlarge.

Dr. Andreas Wesserle discusses with Carolyn the malign influence of “Frankie” Roosevelt on 20th Century power politics. Topics include:

  • Teddy and Franklin Roosevelt shared a “flighty” mentality and competitive view of Germany;
  • War preparation began in 1933; read Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace, ed. by Harry Elmer Barnes;
  • Roosevelt strategized for war with Japan to gain control of the Pacific;
  • King George’s briefcase contained FDR’s war promises;
  • Roosevelt’s controversial recognition of the Soviet Union in 1933;
  • Adolf Hitler’s goals didn’t include a world empire;
  • Pearl Harbor was the traumatic event that has kept American people in state of hysteria.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 56 min.

Contact Carolyn:


19 Responses to “The Heretics’ Hour: The Roosevelt Legacy on World History”

  1. Bob on November 30th, 2010 8:05 am

    The Gibraltar revelation clinches it.

    I had always thought as Carolyn had — that Franco resisted — but now the professor makes clear that Hitler was the resister. It did not sink through to his vision that Britain was plagued by Jews, and Jewthinkers.

    Dunkirk sealed that fate which had been foretold by Long Knives, and consumated by Barbarossa.

  2. Carolyn on November 30th, 2010 2:02 pm

    Sorry Bob, but your characterization that the professor came out with a “revelation” shows you are trying too hard.

    I love Professor Wesserle and I don’t think he would agree with what you write here at all. I don’t know if I can get him to answer you, but I will try.

    I’m glad you’re listening to the shows.

  3. Carolyn on November 30th, 2010 7:53 pm

    Hi Bob,

    I hope you didn’t take my “Sorry Bob” as a dismissal. I found what you wrote a little strange, but after some hours it doesn’t seem as strange as when I first read it.

    However, I don’t agree, based on my own knowledge, which I don’t consider “expert” but “searching.” I sent both our comments to Prof. Wesserle, but he didn’t reply with enough information to satisfy me. He’s recovering from a low-grade virus, he says. I asked him to elaborate and give some sources — we’ll see what transpires.

  4. Carolyn on November 30th, 2010 7:55 pm

    P.S. I just knew listeners were going to zero in on the short Adolf Hitler part of this program instead of on Frankie.

  5. Carolyn on December 1st, 2010 11:16 pm

    I would like to present some material from the Nov/Dec TBR for Bob. This is in “Operation Sea Lion”, pp 57-65, translated from Hermann Giesler’s book, with added commentary, by Carolyn Yeager and Wilhelm Mann.

    In a sidebar on page 60, we write:
    Adolf Hitler remembered his meeting with Generalissimo Francisco Franco at Hendaye as one of his worst experiences. They met at this French town on the Spanish border in October 1940. Hitler was upset for two reasons:
    First, the general’s growing hesitancy to support Hitler’s “Operation Felix,” the plan to take Gibraltar and extend the operation into Spanish Morocco. Franco did not want Spain to join the war. Unbelievable as it sounds, Franco was advised to take up that attitude by Hitler’s chief of the Abwehr, Adm Wilhelm Canaris, who was an expert for Spanish affairs and twice visited Madrid in 1940.

    [This is from The Unseen War in Europe by John H. Waller, 1996, p. 155. But he is not the only source for Canaris' treason concerning Franco.] Continuing …

    Second, Hitler was angered by Franco’s outrageous demands for Germany to supply raw materials, armaments, machinery and even foodstuff with which to fight the war. Franco knew well enough Germany could never fulfill this request. That devious move was also suggested by Canaris. The meeting ended with the signing of a worthless document of mutual cooperation.

    Now, according to Giesler: On page 61, he says on behalf of Hitler:
    “For sure, individual operations in the west, like Gibraltar, would have been possible and could have shown significant results, but only on our own, without drawing Spain into the war. He has been advised against this. He had talked to me about his disappointments after negotiating with Franco. He naturally wanted to attack Gibralter from the land side. He by no means intended to draw Spain into the war. Ally with Spain?–Never.”

    On page 63, Giesler recalled having lunch with Hitler after this meeting with Franco and before going to meet with Mussolini. It was Oct. 26 or 27, 1940. Hitler said:
    “Well, now to Franco–it may well be that my disappointment influenced my judgment. Our discussion remained without results. Franco has no personality, he is absolutely average. Without the Jesuits, who in my opinion not only advise but direct him, he would be insignificant. He is certainly clever in his way, but so are traders.”

    It appears to me that Hitler was not able to form a good relationship with Franco. The two leaders were of different types. Hitler seems unable to exert sufficient will and persuasion toward him. Maybe he didn’t try hard enough.
    But it had more to do with Canaris the traitor, who got there before him and who was right at home in the Spanish language and culture. Canaris convinced Franco not to cooperate with Hitler. It was not Hitler who did not want to invade Gibralter; he did.

    This is what I think, and will continue to until someone convinces me otherwise. I’m open to it.

  6. Akira on December 2nd, 2010 7:17 pm

    My dear Carolyn,

    I’m sure that after all the years of the disastrous civil war, Spain could not have sided with either the British or the Germans in more war.

    Spain would have been torn apart.

    Franco was right.

  7. Carolyn on December 3rd, 2010 12:46 am

    Then you are saying it was Franco who said no to Hitler … is that right?

    In another light, after all the help that Franco received in his civil war – without which he would have been defeated – how could he turn around and refuse help to those who helped him?

  8. Akira on December 3rd, 2010 3:22 am

    Sweet Carolyn,

    Your argument — A “helped” B, so B has to help A — is like the argument that the US should have fought Russia in 2008 because Georgia “helped” America in Iraq, as the Jewo-Cons argued at the time.

    You are confusing governments with the people. Many Spaniards did not view Germans as having “helped” Spain, but rather as fascist aggressors. The idea that Franco could have conscripted Spaniards ans sent them off to die for Fascist ideals is extremely naive. It would have triggered a (US-UK-backed) revolt, which is part of what I meant by saying such an action wold have torn Spain apart (again).

    And surely a gift is supposed to be given with no expectation of reciprocation? Otherwise it is no gift.

    Anyway, Germany assisted the Spanish Nationalist forces because it also benefited Germany:

    – It provided German volunteers with battle experience.

    – It provided the luftwaffe with experience.

    – It was useful to rally Germans together, and inform them about and inspire them against the international Jew-Masonic conspiracy.

    – It saved Spain from becoming The People’s Republic of Spain, which would have ended up at war against Germany.

    As it is said, “Politics is the art of the possible”, and it was, I am sure, impossible for Franco to join the Axis powers in war against the French, British, Soviets, Americans, Canadians, etc., as he would have had a better sense of than the Germans.

    Impossible because the Spanish government wasn’t strong enough to hold the country together after all the bitterness of the civil war, except by being able to provide the people with stability, employment, economic activity, peace.

    And if a Spanish entry into the war had inspired a revolt and/or coup (that would have been encouraged armed and otherwise supported by the UK, Jews, et al) then it could easily have ended up as another anti-German nation, with British and American forces massed at German-Occupied France’s Western border. In that event, D-Day would have happened in Euskadi and/or Catalonia instead of (or in addition to) Normandy, and would have been set for a much earlier date.

    So, just like some British moaned about the Irish Free State being neutral, and even suggesting that Britain should invade and take over — the more sensible Brits knew that a neutral Ireland was the best that Britain could hope for, that an invasion would have backfired on Britain — and were fortunately able to convince the Jews and their alcie puppet Churchill of the same. Likewise sensible Germans were satisfied that Spain was neutral.

    So it makes no difference who said what to whom, since Spain couldn’t practically ally itself with the Axis Powers, and if they had it could well have ended up as an anti-Axis power, with Franco strung up Mussolini-style.

  9. Akira on December 3rd, 2010 3:58 am

    Dearest Carolyn,

    The idea that Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon, the Queen Mother, was a Jew, or even of Jewish descent, is absurd.

    Of course she could possibly have had some Jewish or formerly Jewish or descended-from-Jewish ancestor in some part of her family tree, but some names or EVIDENCE would be appreciated. I could just as easily say that you’re a Jew, “because I just know it!”

    Cecilia Cavendish-Bentinck, Lady Glamis, The Countess of Strathmore and Kinghorne, was a very sincere Christian lady, and if the Earl of Strathmore and Kinghorne was a Jew, then we all must be too.

    Lady Glamis’ father was Charles William Frederick Cavendish-Bentinck (no Jew), son of William Henry Cavendish Bentinck and Anne Wellesley, and her mother Caroline Louise Burnaby (no Jew) daughter of a Burnaby and a Salisbury.

    Likewise no Jews detected in the Earl of Strathmore and Kinghorne, unless they’re so deep undercover that they might as well be The Mole People from Mars.

    If there are some Jews to be found in these lines, I’d appreciate knowing who they are.

    + + +

    Also, talk about FDR wanting this or that for America, and “not realizing” that the USSR would take power/land/influence etc from the US; or that Churchill likewise wanted X or Y for The Empire, and “foolishly” threw everything away in war or whatever — all such talk is frustrating beyond measure, since they were puppets (Churchill much more than FDR), and were Masons, meaning their loyalty was not to either America or to Britain but to the Lodge and The Great Work, which is Tikkun Olam, which is the Jew Agenda.

    + + +

    And “the financial capital of the world” (meaning the Jewish capital) is still The City, and not Wall Street.

    Even Mastercard can tell you that, and since Mastercard owns the majority of Americans, we can suppose they know what they are talking about.

    Mastercard’s Worldwide Centres of Commerce Index:

    1. London
    2. Jew York City
    3. Tokyo
    4. Singapore
    5. Chicago
    6. Hong Kong
    7. Paris
    8. Frankfurt
    9. Seoul
    10. Amsterdam

    And the ideological centre of global oligarchy is still at 60 Great Queen Street, London WC2B 5AZ, not in silly playhouses like The White House.

  10. Carolyn on December 3rd, 2010 3:21 pm

    @Akira, who wrote: Your argument — A “helped” B, so B has to help A — is like the argument that the US should have fought Russia in 2008 because Georgia “helped” America in Iraq, as the Jewo-Cons argued at the time.

    No, it is not like that. And it wasn’t an “argument”, it was simply a comment. And I am not “dear, sweet Carolyn” to you. Please refrain from such.

  11. Carolyn on December 3rd, 2010 11:38 pm

    This is for Bob [and me] from Prof. Wesserle:

    I base my belief about Spain on Goering’s private talks in Nuernberg prison, while putting up a strong fight against his Kangaroo Accusers. Did he have reasons to lie in that situation?
    According to Goering, Hitler feared that France & Spain would start another fight over Morocco. Hitler desired to have France as a friend and was unwilling to witness a row over North Africa in his back yard. Wrong,of course. TheFrench decided to maintain their uual nationalist stance toward Germany. End.

    That is one man’s [Goering's] opinion. I sounds a bit weak to me. He may have been talking through his hat. It’s known that Hitler was quite upset with Franco, but that could possibly fit in with the Spain-France problem. One thing is clear, we’re not going to solve it here.

  12. Carolyn on December 3rd, 2010 11:41 pm

    Akira wrote:
    Also, talk about FDR wanting this or that for America, and “not realizing” that the USSR would take power/land/influence etc from the US; or that Churchill likewise wanted X or Y for The Empire, and “foolishly” threw everything away in war or whatever — all such talk is frustrating beyond measure, since they were puppets (Churchill much more than FDR), and were Masons, meaning their loyalty was not to either America or to Britain but to the Lodge and The Great Work, which is Tikkun Olam, which is the Jew Agenda.

    Carolyn says: That’s too simplistic to say, “They were puppets.” And then you get on your Mason thing. Now that “is” frustrating. :-)

  13. Carolyn on December 3rd, 2010 11:51 pm

    to Akira on December 3rd, 2010 3:22 am

    You have got it wrong. Hitler did not want Spain to join the Axis. Giesler says “Never!” He only wanted Franco to allow German troops, planes, etc. to use Spanish territory and infrastructure, and probably give necessary assistance, to take Gibralter.

    That’s a big request, for sure, but Franco was supposedly a rightwing leader. Well, it’s power politics and self-preservation, yes. But you can imagine Hitler’s frustration at having to deal with such weaklings. I can.

  14. Akira on December 4th, 2010 12:35 am

    Re: “you get on your Mason thing”

    You mean it’s irrelevant?

    Was FDR a Mason?

    Was Winston Churchill a Mason?

    Was King George a Mason?

    Was Harry S Truman a Mason?

    Was Vladimir Ulyanov/Lenin a Mason?

    Was Sigmund Freud a Mason?

    Was Richard Ejirou Graf Coudenhove-Kalergi a Mason?

    Was Konrad Adenauer a Mason?

    Was Leon Blume a Mason?

    Was Sir Robert Borden a Mason?

    Was Nelson Rockefeller a Mason?

    Was John Dewey a Mason?

    Was Lionel Rothschild a Mason?

    Was Camille Huysmans a Mason?

    Was Edward VII a Mason?

    Was Edward VIII a Mason?

    Was Lev Bronstein/”Trotsky” a Mason?

    Was Douglas MacArthur a Mason?

    Was Carol II of Romania a Mason?

    Was Edvard Beneš a Mason?

    Was James Mayer Rothschild a Mason?

    Was Omar N. Bradley a Mason?

    Is David Rockefeller a Mason?

    Is Henry Kissinger a Mason?

    Is Abraham Foxman a Mason?

    Is Nicolas Sarkozy a Mason?

    Etc etc etc

    Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes…

    But that’s all irrelevant … Because they all just get together and sip sherry and talk about the weather?

  15. Akira on December 4th, 2010 12:46 am

    Franco a weakling? I guess you’re joking.

    Re: “Hitler did not want Spain to join the Axis. … He only wanted Franco to allow German troops, planes, etc. to use Spanish territory and infrastructure, and probably give necessary assistance, to take Gibralter.”

    “He ONLY wanted…” ?

    If Spain had permitted Germany to invade Gibralter from Spain, and provided the “necessary assistance” for such an invasion, and provided the German invaders with the use of Spanish infrastructure, then Spain would have been a belligerent power, would have been at war with the United Kingdom, would no longer be neutral, and would have been de facto an Axis power.

    Your statement is incredible.

    It’s like saying, “If Canada allowed Chinese troops to invade the US from Ontario, and provided the necessary assistance, and allowed the PLA to use Canadian infrastructure for their invasion … well, that wouldn’t mean that Canada would be at war with the US or that it would be an ally of the PRC!”

  16. Akira on December 4th, 2010 1:29 am

    Carolyn Yeager:

    “…you get on your Mason thing”

    + + +

    Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf (trans. Ralph Manheim):

    * “The general pacifistic paralysis of the national instinct of self preservation begun by Freemasonry in the circles of the so-called intelligentsia is transmitted to the broad masses and above all to the bourgeoisie by the activity of the big papers which today are always Jewish.”

    * “To strengthen his political position he [the Jew] tries to tear down the racial and civil barriers which for a time continue to restrain him at every step. To this end he fights with all the tenacity innate in him for religious tolerance — and in Freemasonry, which has succumbed to him completely, he has an excellent instrument with which to fight for his aims and put them across. The governing circles and the higher strata of the political and economic bourgeoisie are brought into his nets by the strings of Freemasonry, and never need to suspect what is happening.”

    * “Freemasonry is joined by a second weapon in the service of the Jews: the press.”

    * “While the international world Jew slowly but surely strangles us, our so-called patriots shouted against a man and a system which dared in one corner of the earth at least, to free themselves from the Jewish-Masonic embrace and oppose a nationalistic resistance to this international world poisoning.”

    * “The prohibition of Masonic secret societies, the persecution of the supra-national press as well as the continuous demolition of international Marxism, and, conversely, the steady reinforcement of the Fascist state conception, will in the course of the years cause the Italian Government to serve the interests of the Italian people more and more, without regard for the hissing of the Jewish world hydra.”

    + + +

    Sven G. Lunden, “The Annihilation of Freemasonry,” The American Mercury, vol. lii, No. 206, February 1941:

    “On Hitler’s rise to power, the ten Grand Lodges of Germany were dissolved. Many among the prominent dignitaries and members of the Order were sent to concentration camps. The Gestapo seized the membership lists of the Grand Lodges and looted their libraries and collections of Masonic objects. Much of this loot was then exhibited in an “Anti-Masonic Exposition” inaugurated in 1937 by Herr Dr. Joseph Goebbels in Munich. The Exposition included completely furnished Masonic temples.

    “The persecution was carried over into Austria when the country was captured by the Nazis. The Masters of the various Vienna lodges were immediately confined in the most notorious concentration camps, including the horrible living hell at Dachau in Bavaria. The same procedure was repeated when Hitler took over Czechoslovakia, then Poland. Immediately after conquering Holland and Belgium, the Nazis ordered the dissolution of the lodges in those nations. It was also Point One on the agenda of Major Quisling in Norway. It may be taken as part of the same ugly picture that General Franco of Spain in 1940 sentenced all Freemasons in his realm automatically to ten years in prison. When France fell last June, the Vichy government caused the two Masonic bodies of France, the Grand Orient and the Grande Loge to be dissolved, their property being seized and sold at auction.”

    + + +

    “Masons but Not Free,” Newsweek, 25 June 1945, pp. 114-115:

    “European Freemasonry has been persecuted more thoroughly in the last twenty years than ever before in its turbulent history. Mussolini strangled Freemasonry in Italy in 1925. Hitler annihilated the German lodges when he came to power, and later those in Czecho-Slovakia, Poland, Norway, Holland, Belgium, and Greece. European Masons died, went underground, or fled.”

    + + +

    Joseph Goebbels stated that the Soviet Union’s inclusion in the League of Nations was engineered by 300 “members of the Jewish race and conspirators of Freemasonry.”

    + + +

    Adolf Hitler announced in the Voelkischer Beobachter, 1935.08.08, the final dissolution of all Masonic Lodges in Germany. The article accused a conspiracy of the Fraternity and “World Jewry” of seeking to create a “World Republic”.

  17. A German on December 4th, 2010 10:05 am

    Freemasonry was the NeoCohenservatism of its time!
    It gave Jews the chance to enter higher Goy circles, respectively to rule higher goy circles.
    And the goys even offered themselves as Jew slaves.
    As it is today in Zionistic NeoCohenservatism/JUDEO”christianity”=Evangelicalism.
    That’s why Freemasonry is still important to understand all this misery.

  18. Akira on December 5th, 2010 7:05 pm

    Why Spain was Jew-free — spiritually, ideologically, socially, economically — for 35 years, from 1940-1975:

    Decree, Spain, 1940.03.02:

    Article No 1: To be a Communist, or to belong to a Masonic Lodge or any other Secret Society constitutes a felony.

    Article No 2: As these organizations are now banned by the effects of this decree, all monies and properties are to be confiscated immediately.

    Article No 3: Any advertisement exhorting the principles or pretended benefits of Masonry or of Communism, or of anything against the Faith or the Motherland, will be penalised according to this law.

    Article No 4: Those considered as Masons are those who have been initiated into Masonry and have not been expelled from the Order, or who have not broken altogether their relationship with the organisation. Also considered as Masons are those expelled from the Order with the apparent reason of protecting the member from the objects of this law.

    Article No 5: From the date of this publication, Masons and Communists, as defined in article No 4 above, will be liable to be imprisoned with a “Minor Jail Offense”, for a minimum of 12 years and one day; but this situation could be aggravated by the “Aggravated Circumstances” as explained in Article No 6.

    Article No 6: “Aggravated Circumstances” mean to have obtained any of the Masonic Degrees from the 18th to the 33rd inclusive, having taken part in any Annual Communications, or being part of any Committee or Board of the Grand Orient of Spain, which would indicate the great confidence of the Order being entrusted upon the member.

    Article No 7: Any Mason or Communist who belongs to either organisation must notify the Government of his affiliation within two months of the date of this law.

    Article No 8: Without prejudice to other penalties as per article No 5, those who have no reasonable excuse to be absolved will be separated immediately and indefinitely from Government jobs, Public or Official Corporations, managerial and advisory positions in private enterprise companies, as well as from any other job in which any kind of confidence is entrusted upon them. This law will cover this employment situation in perpetuity. It will be considered as attenuating circumstances to provide information to the authorities about persons who had performed initiations into Masonry, their superiors, or any other person involved in Masonry, or any other item of information that will be of benefit in the carrying out of this law.


    General Francisco Franco

    March 2, 1940

    + + +

    Now there’s someone who knew how to take care of traitors! If only VoR could have the wisdom of a Franco…

    Freemasons are the Jews’ whores.

  19. Carolyn on December 12th, 2010 6:55 pm

    @Akira’s Dec. 3 comment: “The idea … is absurd.”

    From Andreas Wesserle. This came several days ago, but I failed to post it. -cy

    To the “smart listener” I say: ‘That’s right. It IS absurd. It is absurd that Britain, before 1939 one of the great nations of Europe, should after 1945 become the most mongrelized people, culturally, morally & historically in Europe (with several others close behind, unfortunately).

    (2) It is absurd that, in the 19th & 20th centuries, the U.K. sought to loosen the awful rigidities of its feudalism by throwing the social barriers open to the highest bidders – no matter what the moral & historical qualifications of the candidates.

    (3) It is absurd that The Queen – and, later on, the German Pope(!)- blesses by her presence in an RAF “Show”, the flyby of the four-engined Lancaster bomber: the dreaded instrument of multiple genocide against Germany, France, Italy and other countries, wielded with ruthless brutality by Winston Churchill and his “science advisor”, Dr. Lindemann.

    (4) It is utterly absurd that W.C., surely the stupidest European diplomat in 2000 years, should ally himself with the most megalomaniac global politico-economic movement in all history, Zionism, tie the British man-o-war to the coat-tails of the most deceitful yet “unfortunate” politician of all time, F. Roosevelt – who then turned around and sold Britain, Europe, Japan & Asia to his intimate “Friend” at the Conference of Teheran in Dec. 1943, Stalin – that W.C., in sum, a psychopathic mass-murderer in two world wars, should serve to annihilate Europe (including the U.K.) and its greatest people (in all but politics) the Germans, should sow the seeds of nihilism and revolution. Yes – utterly and irredeemably ABSURD and MAD. But the birds are coming home to roost. A.W.