New Right in London, Oct. 23, 2010: Norman Lowell

October 30, 2010

The New Right held their 29th meeting in London, England on Sat. Oct. 23, 2010. This is a speech by Norman Lowell entitled Implementing the Imperium.

Other speeches from the same event:

The New Right is active on Tumblr and YouTube.

14 MB / 32 kbps mono / 1 hour 0 min.


9 Responses to “New Right in London, Oct. 23, 2010: Norman Lowell”

  1. Norman Lowell on November 5th, 2010 6:57 am

    IMPERIUM – Francis Parker Yockey

    Sold out at National Vanguard.…_sresults.html

    Quite expensive at Amazon as limited stock.
    Can be printed here:…s/Imperium.pdf


    Now on sale at direct Link here: 0&search_keywords=&keys=&header_search=true&search =&locale=& Search=imperian+manifesto

    IMPERIUM EUROPA – Norman Lowell…5066743&sr=1-1

    These 3 Books present a complete iMPERIUM Ideology.
    The only Ideology available to the White Man.
    The only way to survival of this minority of Biological Aristocrats.


  2. A German on November 8th, 2010 5:05 am

    This whole speech sounded like an act to me!
    Like a Roman senator who tries to play the people’s tribune to catch the plebs for his agenda.

    Also this cheezy Italian rhetoric.

    Lowell proves that he never really understood Nationalsocialism, otherwise he wouldn’t talk so much of an “elite”.
    Nationalsocialism doesn’t know classes nor an elite!
    In Nationalsocialism there’s only a community of kinsmen, who respect each other and socially care for each other and every kinsmen has the chance to become everything he wants, and even if one kinsman is high up and one very low both respect each other because they’re of one blood, brothers.

    There’s no professional pride nor elitism in nationalsocialism.

    And then this idiotic division of faith:
    cosmotheism for the “elite”, Christianity for the plebs.
    That is disrespectful and utter nonsense!
    Religion is an private and individual issue!

    And then to campare grown nation states like England, France, Germany, Italy with artificial states like Belgium is also pure idiocy!

    Before we force sectionalism, atomisation on Europe’s nations, Europe’s fatherlands, split Malta into 1000 pieces hypocrite!

    And Malta surely was not Atlantis alone!
    Perhaps a part of it but nothing more.
    If Atlantis ever existed it was outside the “Pillars of Herakles”, as Solon described it.
    Pehaps a huge island in the Northen Atlantic Ocean.
    Perhaps the pre-historic Solutrean America, perhaps the pre-historic Cro-Magnon Europe, but
    never Malta alone!

    This puny pebble in the Mediterranean Sea.

    And then the biggest impudence:
    to mock our fallen soldier Eugene Terre’Blanche!

    As fringy his religious ideas may have been, he deserves our respect and dignity!
    Because HE was an actual fighter for our race, for his people the Boer and not only a yapping Maltese dove.

    It was very shameful to ridicule this brave man!

    1 Terre’blanche has more value to our race than 1 million Low-bads.

    All in all: the typical Lowell operetta dramatica.

    Hearing this I wished the Italian army would march into Malta tommorrow to end this lunacy.

  3. Chris on November 8th, 2010 6:00 am

    Settle down “A Gernan”. We know that your criticism of Mr Lowell is based on your desire is to re-establish the Thousand Year Reich, but the rest of us non-Germans might prefer something a bit more agreeable.

    The Reich’s over. Move on an try and contribute to something with more than a snowball’s chance in hell of happening.

  4. A German on November 8th, 2010 6:16 am

    A nationalistic strong awakened German fatherland in a Europe of fatherlands has more chances than Low-bad’s amorphus eltist behemoth imperium!

    I don’t know what you understand under a “Thousand Year Reich”.
    I want an awakened Germany, an awakened Europe and an awakened America!
    And not a right version of the Soviet Union.

    Europe of fatherlands! Europe of nations!

    Go stick together with your fellow mason Low-bad!

  5. Norman Lowell on November 8th, 2010 9:46 am

    “But the greatest opposition of all has not yet been named, the conflict which will take up all the others into itself.

    This is the battle of the Idea of the Unity of the West against the nationalism of the 19th century.

    Here stand opposed the ideas of Empire and petty- stateism, large-space thinking and political provincialism. Here find themselves opposed the miserable collection of yesterday-patriots and the custodians of the Future.

    The yesterday-nationalists are nothing but the puppets of the extra-European forces that conquer Europe by dividing it.

    To the enemies of Europe, there must be no rapprochement, no understanding, no union of the old units of Europe into a new unit, capable of carrying on 20th century politics.” – F.P. Yockey

  6. A German on November 8th, 2010 4:08 pm

    Low-bad you understand NOTHING!

    A Europe of fatherlands, a Europe of nations is not “nationalism of the 19th century.” nor “petty- stateism”.

    That was the mass slaughter of Whites in Verdun in WW1!

    Whites are induvidualistic and want to keep their nations and fatherlands, but that does not mean that Europe of fatherlands, a Europe of nations is 19th century nationalism.
    You can also be pan-Aryan and solidary with other white nations WITHOUT forming a white version of the Soviet Union!

    Europe of fatherlands, a Europe of nations is about awakened white countries, awakened Aryan people who have a sense of togetherness and solidarity without merging everything in a giant melting pot!

    Rethink old man!
    Your operetta dramatica/sovietica will not function!

  7. Chris on November 9th, 2010 5:11 am

    “A Gerry”, what happens when Germans become nationalistic again? No doubt, you will want East Prussia back which means war with Poland. Jobbik wants to unite the Hungarian dispora. That means war with Romania.

    Imperium Europe would not be a Right Soviet Union. I hate the idea of a white melting pot too. From what I understand, it would be highly de-centralised, allowing regional cultures to flourish. It will be more like the Holy Roman Empire than anything. Now there was a Thousand Year Reich that actually worked!

    If anything, nation-states are melting pots as they melt, for example, diverse German peoples into generic Germans.

  8. Norman Lowell on November 9th, 2010 9:16 am


    I wouldn’t waste too much time with him – a rude, crude German.
    He would never understand.
    That German is a fossilized, political dinosaur.

    In our Imperium he would be happy to find his level of competence.
    He would be employed as a tourist guide at one of our numerous archaeological museums – in the palaeology section.

    Let us carry on spreading the only Ideology that can save the White Man and his generations yet to come.
    Let us move forward, ignoring the lumbering, political dinosaurs.
    Let us forge Imperium Europa!

  9. A German on November 9th, 2010 12:16 pm

    Dream on old man!
    And don’t forget to wave with your “manly” Baron’s stick at the end of your ridiculous speeches!

    We will make a museum out of Malta! An Italian museum!

    And Chris,
    the Holy Roman Empire was a mess!
    A chaotic time of sectionalism! You should read some books about that. The sectionalism was one reason why the 30 years war was possible and foreign powers went plundering through Germany!
    North Western Germany lost 25% of it’s population!
    Worse than WW2!

    The reason why Celtic Gallia was destroyed and Cesar killed 2 million Gauls was because they were sectionally organized!