Radio Free Indiana: Interview with David Yeagley

October 20, 2010

Dr. David Yeagley

Matt Parrott interviews Dr. David Yeagley, a conservative Native American and author of Bad Eagle: The Rantings of a Comanche Conservative.

  • Germany’s Blitzkrieg against Multiculturalism;
  • Pioneers and patriotism;
  • Indians and the anti-White Coalition;
  • The prospects for Indians in a non-White America.

About David Yeagley

Dr. David Yeagley has appeared on The Political Cesspool, has written for VDare, and has been targeted by the multicult establishment for his proud and patriotic message.

12 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 54 min.

Contact Matt:


6 Responses to “Radio Free Indiana: Interview with David Yeagley”

  1. Akira on October 22nd, 2010 12:44 am

    With Lindsey’s multiple appearances and now Yeagley, this site is becoming increasingly Jewey.


    “The history of the world is an in-house Jewish dialogue. Why have a problem with this? … Christianity is part of the Jewish faith, you know. It was always regarded as that, until most of the Jewish members of the movement died off, and it was left to the Gentiles, who made it into a system of idolatry”

    His “Holocaust” Opera is hilarious too.


    “Lessons in Persecution: Why Hate Jews

    “by David Yeagley · October 13, 2010

    It is an ancient art, persecution. Not that anyone in particular needs lessons in how to persecute, but, historically speaking, we find the very finest motivations for persecution in the way other people have treated the Jews. It’s a matter of cause, not technique.

    ” Barbare Lerner Spectre, Founding Director of Paideia, The European Institute for Jewish Studies in Sweden, has made some recent statements about the Jewish tactic of multiculturalism.

    “For this cause, she has received some rather seedy, rank opprobrium…

    “With the exception of Adolf Ahmadinejad, most anti-Semitic sites stop short of calling for the extermination of the Jews, and instead writhe in endless lamentation, condemnation, execration, and a kind of psychological defecation.”

  2. A German on October 23rd, 2010 8:39 pm

    Thanks Matt for presenting us this outside perspective.
    Really interesting.

    And with all due respect to Dr. Yeagley and all his degrees, but I see no genuine Comanche. I see a narrow long faced White and as a racialist that’s the explenation for me that Dr. Yeagley seems to have this great Leonardo-like intellect.

    You should have asked him how much Comanche he really is.

    And of course Dr. Yeagley is right, there is a mutual respect between Whites and Indians today.
    The old Westerners fought very hard against the Comanches in the Indian Wars and often no side gave a pardon, but they also respected them as honourable oponents. As far as I know.
    This attitude is even depicted in the so called “racistic” early Western movies of the 1940s and 1950s.
    Where Westerners, tough guys, always were shown as they seemed to have a kind of admiration for their Apache and Comanche enemies.

    And of course the Indians prefer the white rule, because they aren’t crazy. They see the state of Mexico and may damn well remember how Apaches were in constant battles with the Mexicans.

    Some Mexican La Raza Reconquistadores try to bogart now North American Indians like Apaches and Comanches as their “race brothers” to justify there claim on North America and to prove that “they were always in the south of the US”.
    But in fact, the real Indians don’t like this connection to Mexicans, and the Aztecs and ther wonderland “Aztlan” were never in the US, but in Mexico’s north and center.

    The Mexicans aren’t Indians nor white, they’re Mestizos as Mishko always says. And that’s the reason why they’re so angry and have a inferiority complex, which they now try to transform into imperialism by occupying the south of the US.

    Concluding, it was a really good and refreshing discussion.
    It’s always delighting if you’ve such fair minded dialog partner, even or especially if they’re non-white.

    In my opinion Dr. Yeagley could come on more often.

    And for Merkel Matt, as I wrote already in another comment:

    “She totally social-democratized her former conservative party.
    She always supported the Multi Cult and the Turks in Germany.
    Set in a Turk-slave as our president, Turk-Wulff, who himself set in the first Turkish female minister in the federal state of Lower Saxony, where she immediately prohibitted Christian crosses in public buildings.
    Now Merkel says “Multi Cult is a failure”
    But what she really meant was: segregated Multi Cult is a failure!
    She now wants that all the Turks and other Muzzies and Negro soul brothers intermingle into the German people!
    That’s what she really meant!
    And she also said that to calm down the remaining small conservative base in her party and to catch the recent dissent in the population.
    This witch is totally not trust worthy!
    Her father was a pastor and lived with his family in Hamburg, but then they settled voluntarily in Communistic East Germany!!!
    Only red terrorists in the West and convinced Communists did that.
    And then she became FDJ secretary (the Communistic youth organisation in the GDR) and later even a Stasi spy, IM “Erika” (IM= Inoffizieller Mitarbeiter=unofficial co-worker, Stasi term for rat).
    Possibly to get the allowance to study physics in the GDR.
    Merkel is the German Hillary Clinton.
    The Wicket Witch of the West and the Wicket Witch of Central Europe.
    Like Cameron in Britain, she already announced that she’s for an EU membership for Turkey.
    That’s high treason!”

  3. A German on October 23rd, 2010 8:47 pm

    Matt if you can get Dr. Yeagley on again, please ask him for the Solutrean theory and why Indian tribes behave so unfair and destroy scientific evidence, i.e. burry skeletons of possible ancient non-Indians in North America.

    That could be a quite interesting discussion.

  4. mattparrott on October 25th, 2010 7:36 pm

    We’re not on the same page. Of all the political commentators you could be badgering, am I really a high priority? I’m not Orthodox, but I’m critical of Jewry, favorable toward Russia, and working to preserve what’s left of America’s Christian heritage. I know I’m not up to your standards, but I believe you’ll agree that we have a lot of the same enemies and there are more insidious targets for your rhetoric than myself. Just sayin’.

  5. mattparrott on October 25th, 2010 7:47 pm


    I appreciate the kind words.

    I really enjoyed the dialog with Yeagley and look forward to having him on, again. I think we can learn a lot from communicating with thoughtful non-Whites about these racial issues, and not just because of the novelty or the triangulation effect.

    I’m unpersuaded by the Solutrean Hypothesis, though I may change my mind after reading White Apocalypse and looking into the research more closely, which I intend to do.

    I definitely don’t trust Merkel, and appreciate that she’s trying to manipulate the zeitgeist toward her own goals (which are not ours).

  6. Ragnar on October 27th, 2010 7:29 am

    Comanche? Indian? Confused?