Top

The Heretics’ Hour: FDR’s role in causing WWII

September 7, 2010

Tyler Kent
Tyler Kent

Ray Goodwin talks with Carolyn about the nefarious influence of Roosevelt revealed in the Potoki Papers and the secret messages decoded by Tyler Kent. Topics include:

  • German central banker upsets the Jews;
  • FDR’s obstruction of Polish-British negotiations with Germany;
  • Improper messages between FDR and Churchill;
  • Ray Goodwin’s personal friendship with Kent;
  • War was Roosevelt’s objective.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Carolyn: carolyn carolynyeager.com

Comments

16 Responses to “The Heretics’ Hour: FDR’s role in causing WWII”

  1. Akira on September 7th, 2010 5:17 am

    I don’t understand how one can say that “Roosevelt was stupid.”

    He almost achieved what he wanted. The USSR gained control of Manchuria and Eastern Europe. The US got much of Western Europe and control over the pacific. They split Korea.

    His United Nations went on to become officially established and the formerly nationalist government were subdued and joined up, under puppet governments.

    He set up conditions for the Jews to colonize Palestine.

    American isolationism has been a dead political force ever since.

    His banker lodge brothers made fortunes out of the war.

    And the Global-State continues apace.

    What more could he have seriously hoped for out of the war?

    And why the comments about England doing badly in the war?

    Is the City of London not the center of global finance?

    Don’t the British elites control more of the world’s resources now than they did in 1939?

    Is Pound Sterling not the only powerful independent currency in Europe?

  2. Whodareswings on September 8th, 2010 1:17 am

    Below is Tyler Kent’s Spartacus bio. Ray Goodwin didn’t mention that he had apparently already been caught passing documents to Nazis in Moscow even before being transferred to Ambassador Kennedy’s office in London. The dates for both security breaches would have been pre-war for the US, but in retrospect these look more traitorous than a simple case of avid isolationism. Why was he passing documents to the Germans, anyway? It’s odd that Ezra Pound did more jail time for a lot less than the espionage Tyler Kent seems to have been involved in. Why the US State Dept. didn’t press charges against him for spying after his release from prison in Britain wasn’t covered. Maybe next time. Another interesting program, nonetheless.

    “Tyler Kent was born in China in 1911. His father was a member of the U.S. Diplomatic Corps. Kent was educated at Princeton, the Sorbone, the University of Madrid and George Washington University. Kent, who spoke French, Greek, German, Russian, Italian and Spanish, joined the State Department in 1934 as a clerk in the Foreign Service and was posted to Moscow.

    While in the Soviet Union Kent was accused of helping White Russians to smuggle into the United States various Imperial Russian treasures. It was later revealed that he was also passing on documents to Nazi intelligence while in Moscow.

    Kent was transferred to London to work as a cypher clerk at the American Embassy. His arrival in England in the company of Ludwig Matthias, a Gestapo agent, brought him to the attention of MI5.

    In February 1940, Tyler met Anna Wolkoff. Her father, Admiral Nikolai Wolkoff, was the former aide-to-camp to the Nicholas II in London. After the Russian Revolution Wolkoff decided to remain in England. The Wolfoff family ran the Russian Tea Room in South Kensington, a place where members of the secret society, the Right Club, used to meet. Wolkoff introduced Tyler to Archibald Ramsay, the leader of the organization. Wolkoff, Kent and Ramsay talked about politics and agreed that they all shared the same political views.

    Kent was concerned that the American government wanted the United States to join the war against Germany. He said he had evidence of this as he had been making copies of the correspondence between President Franklin D. Roosevelt and Winston Churchill. Kent invited Wolkoff and Ramsay back to his flat to look at these documents. This included secret assurances that the United States would support France if it was invaded by the German Army. Kent later argued that he had shown these documents to Ramsay in the hope that he would pass this information to American politicians hostile to Roosevelt.

    On 13th April 1940 Anna Wolkoff went to Kent’s flat and made copies of some of these documents. Joan Miller and Marjorie Amor were later to testify that these documents were then passed on to Duco del Monte, Assistant Naval Attaché at the Italian Embassy. Soon afterwards, MI8, the wireless interception service, picked up messages between Rome and Berlin that indicated that Admiral Wilhelm Canaris, head of German military intelligence (Abwehr), now had copies of the Roosevelt-Churchill correspondence

    Soon afterwards Wolkoff asked Miller if she would use her contacts at the Italian Embassy to pass a coded letter to William Joyce (Lord Haw-Haw) in Germany. The letter contained information that he could use in his broadcasts on Radio Hamburg. Before passing the letter to her contacts, Miller showed it to Maxwell Knight.

    On 18th May, Knight told Guy Liddell about the Right Club spy ring. Liddell immediately had a meeting with Joseph Kennedy, the American Ambassador in London. Kennedy agreed to waive Kent’s diplomatic immunity and on 20th May, 1940, the Special Branch raided his flat. Inside they found the copies of 1,929 classified documents including secret correspondence between Franklin D. Roosevelt and Winston Churchill.

    The Special Branch officers also found duplicate keys to the embassy code room. The officers were also shocked to find that in Kent had what became known as Ramsay’s Red Book. This book had details of the supporters of the Right Club and had been given to Kent by Archibald Ramsay for safe keeping.

    Kent and Anna Wolkoff were arrested and charged under the Official Secrets Act. The trial took place in secret and on 7th November 1940, Wolkoff was sentenced to ten years. Kent, because he was an American citizen, was treated less harshly and received only seven years.

    In December 1945 Tyler Kent was deported to the United States. Surprisingly, his former employer the Department of State decided not to prosecute him for working as a spy for Nazi Germany.

    Tyler Kent died in a Texas trailer park in 1988.”

    http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/SSkentT.htm

  3. Carolyn on September 8th, 2010 1:40 pm

    To Whodareswings:

    I am surprised that you of all people make statements that you cannot back up, using Spartacus website as a trustworthy source(?). I also disapprove and resent your using this comments section to post long treatises when the simple link is sufficient. If I were in control of this site, as I am of Elie Wiesel Cons The World, I would remove it, giving that explanation.

    Spartacus says:
    While in the Soviet Union Kent was accused of helping White Russians to smuggle into the United States various Imperial Russian treasures.** It was later revealed that he was also passing on documents to Nazi intelligence while in Moscow.**

    Revealed by whom? By what? It does not say. No source for this information. But you believe it. That doesn’t say much for you.

    Your speculations, and implied criticism, are worthless.

  4. Carolyn on September 8th, 2010 1:56 pm

    To Akira,

    When you write:

    I don’t understand how one can say that “Roosevelt was stupid.”

    … you are implying that someone on the program said that Roosevelt was stupid … even though you carefully use the word “one” rather than “you” or someone’s name. The purpose of the comments section is to comment on the content of the program, not to use it for personal propaganda.

    Neither of us said Roosevelt was stupid. Ray Goodwin said that R. was not as shrewd as he is often made out to be, being so easily manipulated by Stalin and the Communists/Jews. That leaves open that he was willingly manipulated, or too sick to know what he was doing. You can disagree with what was said, but don’t reword it.

    On the other issue, England lost her empire. She is not the nation she once was, far from it. Whether a global elite still headquarters in London is beside the point really — England, Britain itself does not benefit from it.

  5. Akira on September 9th, 2010 3:44 am

    You’re so right.

    My faulty memory.

    You didn’t say “Roosevelt was stupid.”

    At 53:20 you said, “Actually, he [FDR] was like a fool.”

    “Stupid”, “Fool.” — I’m sure there’s a world of difference.

    Either way, I don’t see how he was either foolish or manipulated. You seem to be under the misapprehension that Roosevelt and Stalin’s ultimate aims somehow diverged, or that there was some significant difference between America and the USSR. All appearances of difference were just illusory, transitory. Those in control of both entities took the long term view, to the world we live in today, and what is to come.

    + + +

    England never had an Empire.

    There was no such thing as the English Empire (although Henry VIII termed himself Emperor.)

    The British Empire did not benefit the factory workers in Manchester or the farmers in Yorkshire or just about anyone in Ireland.

    The British Empire benefited the same class of people who today benefit from the status of the City of London’s global financial empire. Plus ca change…

    Of course England is not the nation it once was. Not since The Dissolution of the Monasteries, 1536-1541. A brief cultural renaissance and then Cromwell put the last nail in the coffin with his tyranny and his open door to the Christ-Killers.

    + + +

    Again some misapprehensions. You seem to be unaware that the importation of alien masses into Britain, and the ever-worsening cultural diseases are not signs of failure on the part of the British elites. On the contrary, for them all is in order — events proceeding just as planned.

  6. johnUK on September 9th, 2010 8:04 am

    @Whodareswings

    Very interesting information on Mr Kent (if true) and compiled with other evidence that Germany and other states conspired and were being pushed to war against the USSR.

    If anybody would know about the Kent case if it is true or not that he supplied info to German intelligence prior to WW2 it would be David Glantz.

    I could try and e-mail him and see if he has any info on the case.

    @Akira

    “England never had an Empire

    There was no such thing as the English Empire (although Henry VIII termed himself Emperor.)

    The British Empire did not benefit the factory workers in Manchester or the farmers in Yorkshire or just about anyone in Ireland.

    The British Empire benefited the same class of people who today benefit from the status of the City of London’s global financial empire. Plus ca change…”

    What nonsense.

    By that logic there was not a Russian, Ottoman, Roman or any other Empire as there expansion benefited a few elites.

    I think the former colonies of the British Empire would disagree. .

  7. Whodareswings on September 9th, 2010 3:41 pm

    @John UK

    Please do email David Glanz post haste about the Spartacus statement. I have emailed John Simkin, the author of the Kent entry there and am awaiting word from him on this. Here’s a British website of interest with Kent-Wolkoff affair info updates: http://www.statesecrets.co.uk/

    @Carolyn

    So, if you were in charge here you would delete long comments that don’t reflect well on the conclusion presented in the interview that Tyler Kent was a courageous isolationist? That seems rather heavy handed to me. I said it “appears” that he was previously involved in some sort of security breach in Moscow, I didn’t say that I believed this. The Tyler Kent case has been disputed since the day the story broke. In order to understand why I think both sides of the case should be addressed and examined, not just the perspective put forward by the IHR and Barnes Review, both of which have blithely glossed over the fact Tyler Kent had a weak chin. Lighten up!

  8. johnUK on September 9th, 2010 7:07 pm

    @Whodareswings

    Interesting looking book have you read it?

    It would tie in with other things that prior to the outbreak of WW2.

    Ever heard of the Prometey organisation?

    http://rt.com/Top_News/2009-09-01/poland-destruction-ussr-ww2.html

    My suspicion is that British lead efforts since the time of the Crimean war and their agents of influence in the US is to weaken Russia and gain control of Eurasia first with the Communist overthrow of 1917 and attempted secessionism in strategic areas like the Caucasus failed and a more national Communist regime was in place WW2 and the Cold war and today with US lead support of international jihadist groups and networks since the collapse of the USSR in 89 allied with Israeli-Russian organised crime which is linked with the CIA, MI6, Mossad, etc since the Jackson-Vanik amendment and incorporated into the Cold War Gladio network especially that of the Grey Wolves in Turkey and which off shoots of this have conducted a handful of terrorist attacks against the US especially since 98 when Bin Ladin and about 25 Islamic leaders started recruiting from Chechen, Algerian, etc camps in Afghanistan to launch attacks against the US to start a mass Islamic movement.

    After 9/11 the US concocted the mythical Al Qaeda network that he ran the camps in Afghanistan and an international jihadist network.

    9/11 itself was conceived by Bin Ladin, Chechen warlord Khattab and Chechen and Taliban leaders in Afghanistan in 2000 with the intent of hijacking and landing commercial planes in the US demanding US release jihadist prisoners and international pressure for Russia to withdraw troops from Chechnya according to French then US intelligence warnings prior to the attack.

    Info is detailed here on this great website.

    http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=a96hijackerschechnya#a96hijackerschechnya

  9. johnUK on September 9th, 2010 7:18 pm

    @Whodareswings

    IHR and Barnes Review constantly trumpet Suvorov’s books especially Icebreaker and his Stalin secretly planned WW2 thesis which has been widely debunked by the majority of historians who have studied German and Soviet military documents and archives especially Mr Glantz.

    Also I posted another comment directed at you but because I provide more than 1 web link I have to wait until it goes through moderation.

    @VOR

    WTF happened to Mathew Raphael Johnson?

    I tried contacting him via email and the VOR email contact address on this website but I never got a response.

  10. Carolyn on September 9th, 2010 7:21 pm

    Whodareswings writes:
    So, if you were in charge here you would delete long comments that don’t reflect well on the conclusion presented in the interview that Tyler Kent was a courageous isolationist?

    I didn’t say “comments”, did I? I said treatises, using that word to refer to your PASTING of the Spartacus article. That is clear to everyone, I’m sure, and that’s what I would remove. Not your comment. Pasting long articles from sources you like seems to be habit of yours.
    ****
    For you to say, from that unsourced statement and without doing any research on it, that “he had apparently already been caught passing documents to Nazis in Moscow even before being transferred to Ambassador Kennedy’s office in London,” (you won’t even use your own words for your “quote”) is rather grievous in my book. “Apparently already been caught” is somewhat worse than “appears he was previously involved.” In fact, there is no evidence he was caught doing any such thing; there was only “suspicion” … (after the fact?)

    Tyler Kent is certainly not glossed over by the British establishment and their historians. The Spartacus article is essentially taken from Wikipedia. Ray Goodwin was invited on the program to tell his perspective and his friendship with Tyler Kent in 1983. First person accounts are pretty good, I would say.

    You are certainly welcome to discuss the “other side of the case” here to your heart’s content, but you would be more welcome if you had some basis for what you write, not just slapping down some crap from Spartacus and pretending on that basis that you know something.

    The picture above shows that Kent definitely did not have a “weak chin” but actually a strong one. He had very regular features. So you’re wrong again. Rather than lighten up, you need to take things a little more seriously. Cheers. :-)

  11. Carolyn on September 9th, 2010 7:35 pm

    Akira:

    Yes, there is a difference between “stupid” and “fool” as I’m sure you well know … even though they might be used interchangeably. I said that I thought Roosevelt could be fooled because of his vanity and not-heavyweight intellect … which could make him into a fool … and I do think that was the case. I also said he was in poor health at the end and that could have (probably) contributed to his mental dullness.

    I do not think that Roosevelt and Stalin’s ultimate aims were identical, or that there was no difference between America and the USSR.
    ***
    I never used the term English Empire, so you are still engaged in your misquoting.

    I quote you: “You seem to be unaware that the importation of alien masses into Britain, and the ever-worsening cultural diseases are not signs of failure on the part of the British elites.”

    Please tell me where you got that idea from what I said.

  12. Carolyn on September 9th, 2010 7:53 pm

    Whodareswings wrote: Please do email David Glanz post haste about the Spartacus statement. I have emailed John Simkin, the author of the Kent entry there and am awaiting word from him on this. Here’s a British website of interest with Kent-Wolkoff affair info updates: http://www.statesecrets.co.uk/

    I have read the statesecrets piece previous to seeing your mention of it here. Thank you so much for only giving the link. It is written from a totally British establishment pov, but you have noticed, I’m sure, that there is no evidence for the “Nazi spy in the USSR” bee-ess that continues to be repeated in article after Internet article nevertheless. To catch fools like ….?

    The rest of the story is pretty standard and not really controversial.

  13. Whodareswings on September 9th, 2010 11:02 pm

    According to a 1940 TIME magazine article the chin in the picture could easily be a a fake along with the brilliantned hair. Simply more fiendishly clever appurtenances in the spy’s bag of tricks. Everyone knows they are masters of disguise.

    They arrested Tyler G. Kent, a weak-chinned, 29-year-old American code clerk, who went to London from the U. S. Moscow Embassy at the beginning of the war. In his apartment they found six suitcases full of stolen or copied Embassy documents, among them a letter from Prime Minister Churchill to President Roosevelt which had been handed to the Embassy that very morning.

    http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,777518,00.html#ixzz0z5g2i0Iz

  14. Carolyn on September 9th, 2010 11:17 pm

    To WDW:

    Hahahaha. Too funny. First they call him a “weak-chinned clerk” and then “Weak clerk Kent.” Where is the picture of him to prove their weak chin claim? This shows how careful Time magazine is (Not). They publish anything.

    We should remember that in 1940 British Intelligence, of all levels, was operating freely in the U.S. and “influence” over many publications and columnists was powerful, to say the least. They put into print what they wanted. Did you ever read the book “Desperate Deception?” Can’t check right now, but I’m pretty sure that’s the title. Great book.

  15. A German on September 11th, 2010 12:06 am

    @ Dear Carolyn
    I totally agree to what Mr. Goodwin said!
    So I will write something about that issue later.

    I rather want to give y’all a report on the Sarrazin-issue if I may.

    First of all his name is pronounced Teelo Zaratseen, not th like in thunder. Thilo is an ancient German name, medieval, knighst and such stufff.
    His ancestors were French Hugenottes, protestants, who immigrated to Prussia in the 18th century.
    Those folks are famous for their educated middle-classness.
    They were very hardworking and loyal subjects to the Prussian king and really did much for Germany.
    Now to Thilo Sarrazin, he’s a social-democrat now for 40 years, was finance minister in Berlin and then was recommended to the Bundesbank as CEO.

    9 months ago he already produced much furore when he gave an interview to the intellectual magazine “Lettre International”, where he stated:
    “I don’t have to respect anyone who doesn’t respect this country, only abuses social security, does nothing productive besides vegetable and kebap shops and goes on to produce just more vail-girls!”
    and
    “The Turks are conquering Berlin and Germany demographically, like the Albanians did in the Serbian Kosovo!”

    These statements are very unusual for a social-democrat, because the former workers’ party betrayed the German workers, didn’t do anything against unemployment and made people who worked 40 years or more equal to welfare recipients who never worked! And became more pro-immigrants! Like the Demo-rats in the US.
    And so the Social democratic Party of Deutschland (Germany) SPD became more and more an immigrant-invader party like the Marxist Greens.
    Many people jokingly call them ShariaPD since then.

    Well, back to Sarrazin and his faux pas 9 months ago.
    Even then all left hyaenas demanded that he should be fired as CEO and thrown out of the SPD.
    Back then the Bundesbank did nothing and waited until the whole affaire was out of the headlines.
    But the SPD, hyper political correct, tried even back then to throw their loyal party member out of the party, after 40 years of membership.

    Well, they didn’t succeed, although they blamed him in the same way as today, “racist” ect.
    But the rules for a party expulsion are very strict, one can only be expelled if one actually harmed the party, and there was also a difficulty with the fact, that he said all that as a private person and not in any function, as party member nor banker.

    Well, as always the situation slowly got more calm and was forgotten as soon as it was out of the headlines.

    But this time it was different.

    Because this month he realeased his book about difficulties with immigration, especially low IQ immigration and the difficulties with the muslims.
    He stated such things like:
    Muslims IN GENERAL, not individual, have a 20 points lower IQ than Whites/Europeans, which causes illiteracy, which produces over proportional unemployment, massive abuse of European welfare systems, violence, crime, religious fanatism, supremacism and the indignation to integrate but the will to conquer by demography! And he stated that intelligence is 50%-80% inherited and that special educational programs for low IQ Muslims are not much more than a waste of money.

    All this he backed up with tons of surveys and scientific sources.
    I’ve his book. It’s packed with tabulations and numbers.

    So far so good.
    Muslims were pissed and left hyaenas hysterical as always.
    But then he made a crucial mistake: In an interview, his book wasn’t yet in the shops, he tried to explain why he thinks that it is related to the genes and mentioned that Basks have certain genes characteristic for them, and that JEWS have certain genes characteristic for them and so on.
    But as soon as he mentioned “JEWS” he was on the highway to hell!

    As Eva Herman was years ago, then she just used the word “Autobahn”.

    Now he wasn’t only a “racist” and “biggot”, but a NS race hygiene fanatic, an eugenicist.
    Which is equal to Satan in Germany.

    And so the anti-Sarrazin campaign started. He was massively attacked by all kind of left hyenas, 95% of the traitor polticians, 95% of the media and our “lovely” Central Council of Jews in Germany, who always butts in!

    Angela Merkel, who transformed the CDU (Christ Democratic Union) to a 2nd social-democratic party and Turk lobby party,
    (* crescent DU, immediatelly condemned Sarrazin without having read ONE word! Because the book wasn’t yet in the shops!

    Our new president Christian Wullf
    (or Turk-Wulff as Germans like to say since he appointed the first Turkish female minister for Women, Social issues, Health, Family and integration in Lower Saxony, where he was minister president till recently. Aygül Özkan, who promptly ordered to ban Christian crosses from public buildings.)
    without reading ONE word too!
    Wulff called the the Bundedsbank to fire Sarrazin as CEO.
    WHICH IS CLEARLY AGAINST THE GRUNDGESETZ! Base Law.
    Because he has to subscribe to the dismissal as the last person in an absolute neutral position!
    So he violated our fake-constitution.

    And after these 2 crooksdid that, Merkel-Urkel and Turk-Wulff, all the other party leaders followed in besmirching Sarrazin. Especially in the media!
    And the media really tried a vicious trick all the time they talked about Sarrazin and his thesis, they always showed the spectators a token muslim, an “educated” one, which has nothing to do with the reality.
    The biggest joke was, when they invited Sarrazin into a major talk show and positioned an “educated” “Dr.” Naika Foroutan from the university of Berlin, tutor for some immigrant studies=rubbish, as his opponent.
    Who constantly tried to cheat to make the spectators believe that all of Sarrazin’s numbers are false!
    In one show she mentioned that Turks who graduated from grammar school are 8%, in the next show she said 18%, and in the show with Sarrazin she mentioned 27%!!! And constantly called Sarrazin a liar!

    Imagine 27% grammar school graduates!
    This number is so ridiculous! Then Germany would be full with Turkish academics instead of criminals! LOL
    And the she said:
    “Mr. Sarrazin your numbers are false! 27% of the Turks are grammar school graduates! Aren’t that 1/3 or not?”

    And the whole audience laughed about her stupidity!
    Imagine a “Dr.” states publicly in a nation-wide show
    27% times 3 are 100%!!!!

    In fact it’s nearer to 25% than to 33.3%, so it’s clearly 1/4!
    And 27% never can be right!
    LOL

    She also stated in one show, that Turks increased their grammar school graduates by 900% since 1962! 6,800 Turks in Germany in 1962!
    Not mentioning, that the pure number of Turks increased in the same time by 27500%!!!
    And not mentioning, that only 3% of the Turks were grammar school graduates in 1962, because Germany mainly called for guest-workers and not academics in 1962!
    And she also only counts in all her surveys only !2! million Turks!
    Because 1.5 million of them already have a German passport, and so she counts these 1.5 million Turks in all issues:
    welfare, crime, education AS “GERMANS”.
    That alone shows how hoaxed her survey and results are!
    But she is supported by our criminal political class.

    So her “super-natural increase” in Turkish grammar school graduates is a total hoax!
    And that shows what scum is teaching today at German universities!
    Sarrazin quoted Schopenhauer and said:
    “That’s anus-science”
    And everyone laughed.

    And so the campaign went on:
    95% of the politicians against Sarrazin
    95% of the media against Sarrazin
    BUT
    !95%! of the German public FOR Sarrazin!

    The Germans agree to his thesis, but they’re especially annoyed that their “representatives” are totally against the opnion of their own voters.
    Also the total abolishment of freedom of speech in the media annoys the Germans and they’re fed up!
    So much so, that the !Financial Times! warned Bundespresident Wulff, Turk-Wulff, of a “Ceaucescau-moment”, a moment when the political class is so much away from the people that they get over thrown and executed!!!

    And Turk-Wulff was in a big misery, because he has to finally sign Sarrazin’s dismissal as CEO of the Bundesbank, but he wouldn’t have done that neutrally because already stated publicly that he’s against Sarrazin!
    So a state crisis was on the horizon, because Sarrazin was sure that his dismissal would have been cancelled by German courts as unjustful, because he wrote and talked as a private person.

    But now on his book tour, yesterday, Sarrazin admitted that he’s leaving voluntarily, because he “didn’t want to fight against the whole esteblishment”, he thinks he’s not strong enough for that.
    Unfortunately.
    And so he wants to become now totally private person, only writing books.

    BUT he intends to fight against an expulsion out of his party!
    As he stated: “I intend to die with my party membership book”.

    And that could destroy the hypocritical worker’s traitor party ShariaPD!
    Because not only 95% of the German public are on Sarrazin’s side, but also most of the party base, which the party leaders totally ignore.

    If they expel Sarrazin, then the SPD is dead, and becomes a total Turk lobby group, because no German worker will vote them anymore. They’re already only voted by 20% of the people who actualy do vote! Only because people who don’t vote aren’t counted, they still reach 35% or less in elections!
    !40%! of the Germans are so fed up, that they don’t vote in elections anymore! That’s much for Germany. Normal would be 15% not more.

    On the book tour Sarrazin also recieves standing ovations!
    Only a pack of 100 red Antifa scumbags demonstrated against him on his first appearence.

    The NPD (National Party of Germany) representatives in Saxony demonstrated in the parliament of Saxony with placards on which Sarrazin was displayed and written “EVERYONE KNOWS: SARRAZIN IS RIGHT!” when Turk-Wulff made a visit to the parliament of Saxony.
    But then the Stasi-like security of the parliament came and ripped the placards out of the hand of the representatives.
    Like 88/89 when Stasi officers wanted to disturb protesters who brought down the Communistic GDR!

    A pity that Sarrazin saved Turk-Wulff’s neck from the constitutional-rope with his decision to step down.
    But we will see what the possible party-expulsion will bring.

    For Sarrazin’s idea about the different genes, which wasn’t even a part of his book, everyone who took a slight view into the gene issue knows that he’s right!
    Most western Europeans have the proto-European genecode R1b (Ice Agers) of which the Basks have the greatest amount with 95%.
    Central Europe has mainly the gencode I, nicknamed the Nordic or Germanic gene! And Eastern Europe has mainly the genecode R1a, the Slavic-Aryan gene!

    Germans for example have 45% R1b, 45% I and 10% R1a.

    And JEWS, although some of them look European because in Europe they picked up some European genes, mainly have the Jewish/Semitic gene J2!
    Everyone knows that!

    Turks are muds, they have the typical Middle Eastern genes E, J, K and genes from Central Asia.
    THAT’S A FACT!

    So much so that even, Jews and philosemites made fun of the Central Council of Jews in Germany for calling Sarrazin a eugenicist and Nazi.
    Jewish intellectuals asked if the Central Council doesn’t know about Jewish traditions anymore, the Halacha?
    And that Jews around the world are proud to have a special Jewish gene.
    The Cohenim for example, as David Duke showed in his work.

    And when Sarrazin spoke of a “Jewish” gene, he even didn’t mean it in a vicious way, more in a neutral and lauding way!
    He stated: “The special Jewish gene is the reason why they’ve a 15% higher IQ than others”

    And as a last point:
    Muslim organisations.
    We’ve 3 big Muslim organisations:
    - Mili Görüs, a nationalistic Turkish organisation controlled by the Turkish government
    - DITIB, totally controlled by the Turkish Government
    - The Central Council of MUSLIMS in Germany, a more diverse but also by Turkey, radical islamists and Saudi Arabia controlled organisation

    All these 3 groups gathered and gave a big press conference, nation-wide, long before Sarrazin’s book was in the shops, so they couldn’t have read it!

    They came together and they WARNED!
    Of what did they warn?
    - Turkish criminals?
    - Terror?
    - increase of the burka on German streets?
    - Turkish welfare abuse?
    - incest marriages and genetical defects?

    NO!

    They warned of “general islamophobia in Germany” and the chairman Aiman Mayzek called Sarrazin publicly “a Nazi in pinstripe suit” and that Sarrazin’s thesis is racistic and false!
    Again no self-reflection, only blaming, as Muzzies always do!

    And it was also funny to see how Muzzies on the street reacted.
    They react in 3 ways:
    - “You don’t know the Quoran!” Even if one quotes them all the incriminating suras of the Quoran
    - Reductio ad Hitlerum = “Sarrazin is the new Hitler” “Germans have a Nazi gene”
    - “Islam is the most peaceful religion on the world!” despite that they prove the opposite everyday

    LOL
    XD

    Really a pity that we can’t upload images on VOR.
    You would wonder over all the material.

  16. Arty on September 13th, 2010 5:46 pm

    @A German on September 11th, 2010 12:06 am

    >>>
    And JEWS, although some of them look European because in Europe they picked up some European genes, mainly have the Jewish/Semitic gene J2!
    Everyone knows that!
    <<>>Haplogroup J2 (Y-DNA)
    Ashkenazi Jews 15%[17]-24%[10]

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_J2_(Y-DNA
    <<>>And when Sarrazin spoke of a “Jewish” gene, he even didn’t mean it in a vicious way, more in a neutral and lauding way!
    He stated: “The special Jewish gene is the reason why they’ve a 15% higher IQ than others”<<>>34 Israel 94
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IQ_and_the_Wealth_of_Nations<<&lt;

Bottom