Top

The Stark Truth: Interview with Andrew Yeoman

July 14, 2010

Andrew Yeoman

Robert & Andrew Yeoman discuss:

  • The philosophy of National Anarchism
  • Reactions and interactions with different political groups
  • Community service and activism
  • The Epic Beard Man
  • The immigration situation
  • The recent Oakland Riots
  • Francis Parker Yockey memorial
  • Media coverage
  • Liberal collaboration with corporatism; the failure of libertarianism to provide freedom

About Andrew Yeoman

Andrew Yeoman lives in San Francisco and is an avid bicyclist, martial artist, and gardener. In 2007, he started the Bay Area National Anarchists (BANA), which is the first National Anarchist network to appear in North America. Andrew is involved in community service programs to assist the homeless, environmental cleanups, and community building efforts in the Bay Area. Besides this, he has produced and directed over 30 short films on YouTube documenting the political activism of BANA and has spoken about National Anarchism to groups in Southern California, Australia, and Europe.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Robert:
robert_stark_la hotmail.com

Comments

13 Responses to “The Stark Truth: Interview with Andrew Yeoman”

  1. National-Anarchist Woman on July 14th, 2010 11:56 pm

    Excellent interview. :o)

  2. Jon on July 14th, 2010 11:56 pm

    This was an excellent interview Robert. One of your best. I remember when Kievsky brought these guys up on VNN. There is a lot that our side could learn from some of the tactics they use.

    Very good interview nontheless. Kudos.

  3. NeoCon Hysteria on July 15th, 2010 6:18 am

    The group who attacked you has to be on the payroll of some political force. The fact that the media instantly picked up the story and put a picture of your bruised face along with the label “White Separatist” only solidifies the motives behind the whole indecent.

    You got set up.

  4. Patrick on July 15th, 2010 6:42 am

    Mr Yeoman mentioned that the rioting after the grant verdict was uncalled for. Actually when the justice system is not holding police officers accountable it makes sense for people to to riot as a way of providing a negative reaction to police brutality as a way of hopefully discouraging future acts of police brutality. In other words if the justice system does not make it unpleasant for the police to abuse people then rioting would be a way to make it unpleasant.

  5. Patthemick on July 16th, 2010 1:35 am

    Were these anarchist guys the ones that aided the blacks in the riots over the BART shooting?

  6. Patrick on July 16th, 2010 11:18 pm

    I dont know what each individual national anarchist was doing during those riots but according to the interview the national anarchists did not participate in the riots.

  7. Morten on July 21st, 2010 8:25 pm

    Again, just like Lindsay, these “national anarchists” are saboteurs from communist groups who want to pose as nationalists to distract our community. National anarchy is an oxymoron if there ever was one, and however much they argue that they’re not communists, these people hang out with commies and leftist radicals on their free time. Just like the national anarchy _freaks_ we have here in Europe.

    VoR, this man is a complete fraud, each guest is more left-leaning than the last. Anarchy is a completely anti-western, anti-traditionalist ideology, and these people are liars and frauds. Time to act, VoR.

  8. Morten on July 21st, 2010 8:32 pm

    To quote a great man. It’s time to stop this silliness, right now.

  9. NeoCon Hysteria on July 21st, 2010 11:18 pm

    @ Morten

    “National anarchy is an oxymoron if there ever was one”

    You should hear this so called anarchist PM’ing me on YouTube about “Anarcho-Capitalism”.

    He says he agrees with pretty much everything i believe in but he was surprised that i was opposed to Anarchism. Thus, his attempted introduction to “Anarcho-Capitalism” as if i would relate to it opposed to tradition Anarchism.

    I said the same thing you just did. I said, “We have Anarcho-Capitalism right now, its called Globalization.” He freaked out and had an emotional breakdown. “No No no! Globalization is centralization of power”

    Uhh, no it isnt. Globalization is corporations running around the world wherever they please, raping a pillaging without any rules. The only rule in Globalization is make the most profit. Sounds like Anarcho-Capitalism to me.

  10. Ragnar on July 28th, 2010 5:39 pm

    If the USA became a land divided into different National Anarchist groups, without nuclear weapons, it would not have the ability to deter other nations from using their nuclear weapons on it and then sending in land forces to completely subdue the different National Anarchist groups. Obviously, this would not be the case if each National Anarchist group had its own nuclear weapons, or the different National Anarchist groups had a joint nuclear weapons capability, but I do not think this is National Anarchist policy. Please tell me if I am wrong about this.

    I also want to make the point that no White person has a moral responsibility to care AT ALL about the well being, physical or mental, of any other race. There is no morality in Nature. There are no rights in Nature. There is only POWER. MIGHT IS RIGHT, and all White people need to dump ALL compassion for the other races and only concern themselves with their own race – the White Race. Being soft and nice will get us exterminated as a race. This is war!

  11. NeoCon Hysteria on July 28th, 2010 6:30 pm

    @ Ragnar

    Your outlook is primitive and hollywoodish. This isnt warhammer.

    Containment, restriction, education and proxy wars are the modern way of diplomacy and problem solving.

  12. Ragnar on July 29th, 2010 6:02 am

    NeoCon Hysteria,

    I do not care if you think my out look is “primitive and hollywoodish.” I only care whether it is true or not, and you have not shown it to be false. I stand by what I said.

  13. Ragnar on July 29th, 2010 6:08 am

    NeoCon Hysteria,

    Here is a challenge for you: Prove that ‘Rights’ exist.

Bottom