The Stark Truth: Interview with Paul Fromm

June 30, 2010

Paul Fromm

Robert Stark & Paul Fromm discuss:

  • The immigration reform that was passed in both the US & Canada in 1965
  • Demographic changes and multiculturalism caused as a result
  • Trade policy and globalization
  • Thought crime laws and free speech activism

About Paul Fromm

Paul Fromm is a longtime anti-immigration and pro-free speech activist from Canada. He is the founder of Citizens for Foreign Aid Reform (C-FAR), the Canadian Association for Free Expression (CAFE), and the Canada First Immigration Reform Committee.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Robert:


19 Responses to “The Stark Truth: Interview with Paul Fromm”

  1. A German on July 1st, 2010 9:00 am

    Some examples what the Multi Cult wreaks in Europe, just in the last days:

    - In Hamburg the police was called because a Turk showed his genitals in public. When the policemen came to the place and wanted to arrest him a horde of 30 Turks attacked the policeman.
    It was a planned ambush. One 46yo policeman was perilous injured.
    - In Denmark Muzzies again and again attack the staffs of super markets with extreme violence and no reason.
    - In Austria an 8yo Turk burnt a school. In Sweden such burnings are daily routine. Schools and other public buildings. And when the police and fire department arrives, the Muzzies attack them with extreme brutality.
    - In Sweden a Muzzie raped a 7yo Swedish child in the toilette of a public library, meanwhile the mother read a book.
    Because of POLITICAL CORRECTNESS it is forbidden for the Swedish media to publish a specific depection of immigrants, even if the police has such specific depiction!!! So in this case, the newspaper reports it has a specific depiction but isn’t allowed to publish it.
    - in Essen/Germany a Turk robbed and raped a woman in her own apartment.
    - In the moment a Turk is accused in the court of Gelsenkirchen/Germany of 111 rapings of children! But he isn’t the record holder, another Turk raped 400 children!!!
    - In Duisburg/Germany a group of picknicker was clobbered by a gang of Turks without any reason. One of the picknicker had to undergo emergency surgery to save his life.

    And on and on and on.
    Such atrocities happen every day.
    And our politics does nothing and our media doesn’t report.

  2. Nationalist Realist on July 3rd, 2010 10:22 am

    Anti-Turk and Anti-Muslim, are you a neo-con A German?

    If you think Islam and the Muslims are “the” problem, you are mistaken.

  3. NeoCon Hysteria on July 3rd, 2010 8:41 pm

    The Muslims are indeed a MAJOR problem within Europe. Remnants of the Ottoman Empire still exist in places like Kosovo and South East Europe.

    More recently with the illegal immigration and Work Visa violations of the Turks in Germany, Austria and France.

    Not to mention the massive flood of Muslims coming through illegal shipping vessels from N Africa into Italy and Spain who quickly move north.

    The Muslims problem will be taken care of.

    The problem with people like “Nationalist Realist” is they believe that European Nationalist are allied with the Muzzies simply because we are well informed about the Zionist.

    Think again. If anyone in this world is going to control the Zionist is will be a Christian Coalition not some rag tag band muslim rodents.

    Arab Muslims are some of the dumbest people in the world. Today they cry cry cry about Israel and the Jews. When they didnt do a single thing except sit on their lazy asses in WWII. They had their chance 70yrs ago.

    Russia, Germany, France and all their European sister states will NOT let Turkey and the Arabic Kingdoms gain another foothold in Europe like they did with the Ottoman Empire.

    LOL! So you can sit here and try to spew your stupid crap.. believing that European Nationalist and Muslims are united in the same cause. You will only be fooling yourself.

    Jews AND Muslims out!

    We will use the Jews cause to deport Muslims out of Europe. And then we will put the Jews in their place.

  4. johnUK on July 3rd, 2010 8:42 pm

    @A German

    Is this the same Muzzies that European countries have been supporting since 79?

    It seems Europe does not like its own medicine especially Germany.

    Maybe Germany should think about that when they hoid World Congresses and internatonal conferences financed by the CIA.

  5. NeoCon Hysteria on July 3rd, 2010 8:52 pm

    Everything the Muslims know about ‘Zionist’ was learned by Europeans. All they do is imitate.

    If you look at Radical Muslim groups.. you will see they re-hash European Nationalist work and stamp it as their own.

    They’re a bunch of posers whos brains have been radiated by the sun for 1000′s of years.

    All desert cultures where the heat is 120+ have populations with very low IQ’s The heat kills braincells, motivation, work and production. Thats why Arabs are always sitting around swatting flies off each instead of evolving into something better.

    Arabs take take take from European culture and then claim it as their own. Then turn around and blast European culture.

    Arabs will do ANYTHING to become a EU citizen… yet call for the destruction of Europe. Go figure.

    These rodents from the desert will be expelled yet again by Charlemagne 2.0

  6. A German on July 4th, 2010 11:28 am

    NeoCohen me?
    LOL XD

    For that I have to be a IsraHell 1ster.

    Come to Germany and you will get Anti-Turk yourself very quick!
    And I’m anti-Islam because it’s their ideology of supremacy and conquest, disguised as “religion”.

    Turks are savages already and Islamn even increases that.
    The religion of piss.

    Europeans, like the Bosniaks, who’re muslims, are traitors for me!
    And should be deported to their Islamic wonderland, Saudi Arabia.

    If they repent and abolish this pig religion, they can stay, at least they have European genes.
    But they won’t because Islam brainwashed them and made them illoyal.

    But a Turk who converts to Christianity will never be accepted by me as “European”. Because he has no European genes.
    NeoCohens would do that.

    Is that clear enough Nationalist Realist?

  7. Carolyn on July 4th, 2010 12:24 pm

    The Austrian-Hungarian Empire battled the Ottoman Empire to regain the land of the Banat — primarily what we know as Hungary, Romania, Yugoslavia — that the Turks had taken through conquest.

    They drove the Turks out and the Habsburg Maria Theresia encouraged the resettlement of the barren, wasted land by Germans, to prevent reinvasion by the Turks. Through extreme hardship the Germans persevered and eventually flourished, my ancestors being among them from the beginning. My great, great, great, great grandparents had 11 children; only two lived past childhood. And that continued in the next generation.

    Now they are inviting the Turks back in, just as the Americans are inviting the Mestizos (Indians) back in. We will have to do it all over again. Who is responsible?

    The enemy of our enemy is not necessarily our friend.

  8. NeoCon Hysteria on July 4th, 2010 6:50 pm

    Actually it was the Russians and the Tsar who finally defeated the Ottoman Empires expansion into Russia.

    So the Russian deserve alot of credit and respect as part of the larger European identity.

    The Holy League failed countless battles simply due to being outnumbered 5 to 1 in some battles. I think they did eventually stop them in northern Hungary like you said.

    The Ottoman Empire was around from 1299–1923. Only 80yrs ago!

    Yes you’re right.. have 700yrs of fighting the Turks… some elements in the EU INVITE them in by the millions!!! Traitorous devils.

  9. Carolyn on July 4th, 2010 11:01 pm

    But I wasn’t talking about Russia, but Hungary, Romania. So your use of the word ‘Actually’ is misleading. Maybe you should have begun with ‘Also.’ Then everything you wrote is fine.

  10. NeoCon Hysteria on July 4th, 2010 11:42 pm

    I meant to say their expansion into Europe. The Ottomans pushed up as far as they could and were eventually stopped when they hit the mountainous regions in NE Slovakia. From there they stayed for a very long time until attempting to push into Russia, following a much easier path.. only to get their ass’s kicked.

    My use the word Actually isn’t misleading because i was simply expanding on what you already said by mentioning Russia’s role in stopping the Ottomans during the twilight of their Empire.

    Hungary and Romania failed for 400yrs as far as i know.. so using the word ‘Also’ implies that the Hungarians and Romanians did something substantial to thwart Ottoman expansion. According to what i read, they did not. It wasnt until the Russians got involved that the Ottomans experience their first real devastating loses.

  11. Carolyn on July 5th, 2010 1:38 am

    Maybe you are reading pro-Russian material. You seem to be a Russophile. It was Germans Empress Maria Theresia sent to settle the areas of Hungary, what is now Romania and even south into the Banat … there were no Russians.

    Whether it was the Russians weakening the Turks that made the A-H victory possible, I don’t know. You seem to think so.

    ‘Actually’ implies a correction to what was said previously.

  12. NeoCon Hysteria on July 5th, 2010 2:18 am

    Dear god the Egos from people who comment on this site is like an infectious disease.

    First of all you offer absolutely NO timeline to anything you’re talking about. The Ottoman Empire lasted around 800years. You’re purposely being vague and short because you lack the proper background on the subject.

    You clearly are not well educated about those 800yrs. So you nit pick about stupid crap that has nothing to do with anything, accept save your ego.. which i guess you feel was threatened by me by typing the word ‘actually’. wtf is wrong with people around here? Get a frigging life please and stop being so sensitive.

    What is a Russophile? Some useless word created by Jews during the Cold War?

    “Maybe you are reading pro-Russian material.”

    Apparently knowing world history makes you a ‘pro-russian russophile’. Chick. Dont label people if you dont even know what you’re talking about. “I don’t know.” – you

    Fact is, the Holy League FAILED countless battles against the Ottomans. It wasnt until the 1700-1800′s that the Russian Empire started handing them loses. If pointing this historic fact out makes me a Russophile, then i guess anyone who studies the Ottoman Empire’s timeline is also a Russophile.

  13. neoconslayer on July 8th, 2010 2:33 pm

    hey neocon

    “So you nit pick about stupid crap that has nothing to do with anything, accept save your ego.”

    Calm down. Count to ten. Settle the rattled ego. Thicken some skin cells. You’re making yourself look foolish, guilty of the same nit-picky-ness that you are complaining about.

    And Russophile is a perfectly reasonable word to use and probably not intended as an insult. I myself am a recovering Anglophile. So what of it? Sheesh.

  14. Carolyn on July 8th, 2010 8:19 pm

    Neoconslayer is right. You, Hysteria, are being hysterical. If you want to know who has the ego, count up the comments you have posted on this website and their length.

    I was short because I do not have the time to go into the history of this. I said I did not know, you could be right. I had made a straightforward comment concerning what I knew about my ancestors and how they got into that area. You addressed me that the Austro-Hungarians had done nothing, but it was the
    Russians who won the victory. What was the point of that? I don’t consider Russophile a derogatory name, do you? I am a Germanophile and don’t care if anyone calls me that. I’m also a holocaust denier and wouldn’t argue with anyone who called me that either.

    Your problem is that a CHICK has the nerve to say anything at all here, and especially to not defer enough to your superior self. It’s all too tiresome.

  15. Carolyn on July 8th, 2010 8:47 pm

    I had written: “Whether it was the Russians weakening the Turks that made the A-H victory possible, I don’t know. You seem to think so. ” I thought that was a concession, because I did/do not know. But the impression I had of what preceded my ancestors arrival there is corroborated by Wikipedia, The Battle of Vienna. I’m not saying this is telling the whole story.

    The Battle of Vienna (German: Schlacht am Kahlenberg, Polish: Bitwa pod Wiedniem or Odsiecz Wiedeńska, Turkish: İkinci Viyana Kuşatması, Ukrainian: Віденська відсіч / Viděns’ka Vidsič) took place on the 11 and 12 of September[2] 1683 after Vienna had been besieged by the Ottoman Empire for two months. It was a battle of The Holy League versus the Ottoman Empire and fiefdoms of the Ottoman Empire near the Kahlen Berg mountain in Vienna. The battle marked the beginning of the political hegemony of the Habsburg dynasty in Central Europe.

    The Viennese army was led by Ernst Rüdiger Graf von Starhemberg subordinate of Leopold I Habsburg, Holy Roman Emperor.

    The large-scale battle was won by Polish, Austrian and German forces commanded by King of Poland John III Sobieski versus the Ottoman Empire army and the Ottoman fiefdoms armies commanded by Grand Vizier Merzifonlu Kara Mustafa Pasha.

    The siege itself began on 14 July 1683, by the Ottoman Empire army of approximately 150,000 men.[3] The besieging force was composed of 60 ortas of Janissaries (12,000 men paper strength) with an observation army of c.70,000[4] men watching the countryside. The decisive battle took place on 11 and 12 September, after the united relief army of approximately 80,000 men had arrived.

    It has been suggested that the battle marked the turning point in the Ottoman–Habsburg wars, the 300-year struggle between the forces of the Central European kingdoms and the Ottoman Empire. Over the sixteen years following the battle, the Habsburgs of Austria gradually occupied and dominated southern Hungary and Transylvania, which had been largely cleared of the Turkish forces. The battle is also notable for including the largest cavalry charge in history.

  16. Akira on July 9th, 2010 6:09 am


    Aren’t you a bit too long in the tooth to be referring to yourself as “a CHICK”?

    + + +

    Hysterical Neo-Con,

    Are you using The New Math when you calculate that the Ottoman Empire lasted for 800 years from 1453-1923? They like to say from 1299, which is inaccurate, and even later it was The Sultanate of Rum and not The Ottoman Empire. Perhaps that’s what you had in mind. Perhaps 1299-1923 is 800 years. I don’t know about stuff like that. I leave such things to intellectuals such as yourself.

    + + +

    Who first drove the Turks back?

    Let’s rather discuss who’s inviting them back: The same cult that’s proceeding with their 1776 plan for a complete American Union: The Slavemasons.

  17. Carolyn on July 9th, 2010 11:57 am


    Preceding my use of the word Chick:

    “Apparently knowing world history makes you a ‘pro-russian russophile’. Chick. Dont label people if you dont even know what you’re talking about. “I don’t know.” – you”

    I agree with NeoconHysteria on many things, and one is that much of the commenting on this site is overly hostile. I suppose we are all at fault at one time or another.

  18. Akira on July 9th, 2010 1:59 pm

    I think what he meant was, “Girlfriend, you ain’t all that! Talk to the hand!”

  19. Morten on July 14th, 2010 2:12 pm

    “- In Sweden a Muzzie raped a 7yo Swedish child in the toilette of a public library, meanwhile the mother read a book.”

    …and I thought I was having a good day. Sigh..