The Sunic Journal: Interview with Mark Weber #2

March 24, 2010

Mark Weber

Tom Sunic interviews Mark Weber. Topics include:

  • Who controls the cultural hegemony in America?
  • How the American form of individualism has been both an ingredient of the West’s success, but also its destruction.
  • How universalism and egalitarianism have become the preeminent features of the present world order.
  • Does America have the potential to prevent the further decay of European Civilization?

About Mark Weber

Mark Weber is a prominent historian and the director of the Institute for Historical Review (IHR).To learn more about Mark Weber please go to the IHR website; you can also learn more about him along with other like-minded historians and their projects at

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 56 min.

Contact Tom:


18 Responses to “The Sunic Journal: Interview with Mark Weber #2”

  1. Dave on March 24th, 2010 9:44 pm

    This one of the best shows I have listened to on this or any other network. Mr. Weber nailed the fundamental ideological and, thus, psychological, restraints in repsect to the ‘west’s’ inability to mount a serious counter-argument to the New World Order’s plan to eradicate the Caucasian peoples: Egalitarianism and Universalism. They must go if we are to survive.
    Great Show Dr. Sunic and Mr. Weber
    Please try and have Mr. Weber on your show regularly to discuss these matters and their remedy more fully.

  2. Rich on March 24th, 2010 10:02 pm

    Outstanding interview !!! If you think all is lost then listen to this interview — it will give you some “keep the faith” fuel and help inspire you to get out and have an active role in the movement.

  3. Au on March 25th, 2010 11:51 am

    The Founders of the United States were indeed Europeans but they did not articulate themselves politically as Europeans. They did not have a vision of the US as an explicitly European land. Ethnocentrism did not play a part in the manifesto of the United States. Instead, the manifesto was based on Enlightenment idealism and classical liberalism. Those are simply the facts.

    Appealing to the political history of America thus is of little use to us. To be consistent, a White Nationalist in the America must disregard the political history of the United States, because it doesn’t offer an ethnic vision.

    To be consistent, a White Nationalist in America must actually disavow the entity that is the United States government. Legitimizing and accepting it simply means that one endorses its propositional Enlightenment vision.

  4. Au on March 25th, 2010 11:52 am

    I have to add that the Founders lack of vision is important, and we can’t use the excuse of “it was so obvious they didn’t have to say it”. Legalism is all about pointing out precise, minute details.

  5. Au on March 25th, 2010 11:52 am

    *lack of racial vision*

  6. Au on March 25th, 2010 12:55 pm

    There was indeed a resurgence of nationalism in Eastern Europe and Russia after the fall of the USSR. However we should be careful not to read too much into this vis a vis our present situation.

  7. Au on March 25th, 2010 12:58 pm

    The Old Communist system wanted to destroy European peoples through overt ideology; yet though they were bombarded by fraudulent dogma, the people remained. The Western model is more insidious in that it uses has a more sophisticated propagandistic attack, and employs Mass Immigration justified via Capitalism to break the European people. The Western model seeks to remove the people themselves; it does not place trust simply in ideological-brainwashing.

  8. Au on March 25th, 2010 1:07 pm

    Norwegian kids a minority by 2021 in the capital. New multicultural TV-show for kids airs.

    “These are fresh numbers from the Board of Education in Oslo. In 2000, 31% of all students in Oslo had a minority background. Ten years later, today, the number has risen to 40%, with a full 1% increase per year, which means that native norwegian students will become a minority in Oslo in 2021 if the increase continues like it is today, writes VG.”

    The Western model of Capitalism and Liberalism is actually more fatal to European peoples than Old-Style Communism.

  9. 30.06 on March 25th, 2010 3:17 pm

    Dr. Sunic , the Neo-Cons , who still call the shots , and are still driving forward with their Zionist Expansion theme , of The Project For A New American Century , are even now preparing to unleash a new conflagration , on behalf of the Zionist Murder machine .
    We must awaken Americans and Europeans together , to the threat imposed on the world , by the ambitions and evil designs , of this nefarious Cabal . Please help to bring awareness , to this very pressing matter , by spreading this link all over the web .

  10. Edgardus de la Vega on March 26th, 2010 12:13 am

    Though slow but steady, a nascent form of racial consolidation is occurring amongst our white American population. It’s the needed evolutionary/environmental response for preservation and continuance.

    Politicians need not apply for our bandwagon.

  11. Gibson on March 26th, 2010 9:47 am

    Mark Weber says all our problems are the White man’s fault, and the jew is not to blame. He is not clear or specific about what our problems are, probably because that would mean naming the jew – he seems to be happier singing the praises of the jew.

    What “Historical Review” does IHR do now? Is its only purpose to “review” the history of the Frankfurt School, and absolve them of any responsibility?

    We get this kind of distortion of reality from the Main Stream Media – so why is VOR broadcasting it too?

  12. Mishko Novosel on March 26th, 2010 11:43 am


    I’ve met Mark Weber, and he knows the score. However, we have to remember that the Jews would not be where they are today without the fact that white men did nothing to stop them.

  13. icr on March 27th, 2010 2:01 pm

    Mr. Weber,

    Please reprint Francis Parker Yockey’s Imperium. Or, if you can’t , maybe you could sell the rights to someone who would.

  14. Hausser on April 1st, 2010 8:22 am

    Top of the line discussion.

    Great work Tom and Mark

  15. President on April 4th, 2010 2:52 pm

    When Sunic lets the interviewee talk, the show gets good. Now if he just could stop using those tiresome expressions like “quote unquote” ad nauseam he’d be interesting to listen to by himself.

    Maybe this type of speech is fashionable in French or German, but when spoken in broken English, it sucks.

    Weber was excellent to listen to.

  16. Akira on April 5th, 2010 10:37 am

    The President of the Sunic Anti-Fan Club wrote:

    “When Sunic lets the interviewee talk, the show gets good.”

    I feel that this is discriminatory against the handicapped.

    I’m sure that Dr Sunic could easily — if I may say so — produce a letter from a reputable — quote, unquote — Viennese Witch Doctor confirming that he is psychologically –so to speak — incapable — quote, unquote — of allowing his interlocutors — if we may call them that — to talk, so to speak, that is….

  17. President on April 6th, 2010 2:15 pm

    You’re good Akira. Head on the nail.

    [Edit: No, Mr. President, Akira simply showed what a shallow jackass he is by openly mocking an intelligent, literate man who speaks English as a third language and is doing his utmost to inform his audience. Your approval of a reply which seeks to belittle the man for his use of English shows something of your own low mentality as much as the one who posted it. -Steve(Codex)]

    I also notice a slow slide towards political correctness here on the VoR. They actually censored my nome de plume here. And I thought I had been politically correct in composing it. So I’m not allowed to call myself N-word President here?

    [Edit: I was doing you a favor with the change. Your asinine nom de compte certainly isn't fooling anyone. Rather than attempt to be clever, you might as well have used the name "Nigger President," as it's more suited to your personality. -Steve(Codex)]

    That’s OK with me. However, as soon as some site or organization starts becoming kosher in this way it is time to diwest from it.

  18. anna on April 6th, 2010 9:56 pm

    Growing up in an area of the U.S. with some of the oldest populations (and white– still 98% white) parts of the country, we certainly DID DEFINE ourselves in terms of Christianity—and PROTESTANT Christianity and very specific history.

    I was a teenager before I even MET a Catholic. We saw, even then, America as a Protestant nation, (despite actual changes in the world), and as ourselves having a trajectory here historically and a identity here. Many were NOT “irish” but Scotch-Irish and English. I did not meet anyone, really, of Irish descent until I was in my twenties. The North of the U.S. is much newer to the country, generally, and it’s identity (and ideas given to it via propaganda about what the U.S. is and means) was very strange to me when I moved to Northeast cities for school.

    When I first heard people talk about the U.S. as a “European nation,” it was actually very offensive, on a level— while it’s the way of what’s happened to the country, and yes, we are all white— the older populations are often spoken about with the same rhetoric used by msm, (rednecks, uneducated, etc.)

    Having studied with Jews very closely, and in synagogue setting, it’s true that they define themselves historically, but not much differently from the way our own people did during my childhood.

    One of the main differences in tone in the country, and the reason Jews have been able to ‘hold onto’ this history, etc., is that they are generally pushing ideas that deeply serve the largest financial interests.

    If whites touted ideas that bankers would deeply benefit from, they would be funded. Their history would be more prominent, etc. Jews are doing what the big money wants. They’re rewarded at the moment.