The Sunic Journal: Interview with Carolyn Yeager

December 16, 2009

Carolyn Yeager

Tom Sunic discusses the issues of freedom of speech and historical revisionism with Carolyn Yeager, an artist and a writer.

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 56 min.

Contact Tom:


21 Responses to “The Sunic Journal: Interview with Carolyn Yeager”

  1. Hans Kopp on December 16th, 2009 10:23 am

    Hallo Tom
    I want to listen to the Ann Morrison interview, but even when I did turn the volume up I could not hear it.

  2. caranthanus on December 16th, 2009 4:06 pm

    A strong and uncompromising appeal for historical truth about writing and talking of t events during and after World WarTwo involving Germany , its politicl and military leaders , its soldiers and the millions of Geenam refugies .Ms Yeagers arguments based on thorough research should awaken the pseudo witnesses dreaming up. stories of persecution , writing books and directing movies poisoning the minds of the young generation.

  3. Mike Conner on December 16th, 2009 4:47 pm

    Hi Hans,

    I double checked the audio files of both this interview and the Ann Morrison interview, and the volume levels are correct. You may need to adjust your computer system’s volume control.

  4. Drew on December 17th, 2009 12:18 am

    This was one of Dr. Sunic’s best interviews, and I look forward to him having Ms. Yeager on his show again. The most salient point, which Mr. Sunic himself emphasized, was that nothing will change until the Holocaust myth is exposed to the world as the cruel hoax that it is.

    The Holocaust rhetoric is much more powerful than any Liberal/Marxist co-opting of our language. The Holocaust has become the very basis of our language and ideology, and this is what needs to be changed before our mode of political discourse has any hope of changing. Great show.

  5. Carolyn on December 17th, 2009 2:53 am

    May I please ask you: What do you think we can actually change?
    Thank you.

  6. Luis Magno on December 17th, 2009 9:12 pm

    Carolyn wants to revise the false and defamatory anti-German Holocaust Myth written by Jews and Judeophiles about European Germans. I want to revise the false and defamatory anti-Spanish Black Legend written by Anglo-Saxons and Anglophiles about a European-American ethnic group, the Spanish Americans.

    My revisionism invokes America’s present mixed-race and immigrant existential crisis. Carolyn’s revisionism invokes WWII history with indirect relevance to today’s existential crisis. The Holocaust Myth and the Black Legend do share a common Jewish source.

    The Black Legend is closely intertwined with American history going back to the early eighteenth century following American independence from Great Britain. The Holocaust Myth arose toward the middle of the twentieth century following the end of WWII.

    My revisionism is more doable because it is necessary from a national existentialist and survivalist perspective. Carolyn’s historical revisionism confirms the necessity of ny historical revisionism but is not itself existentially necessary, at least not directly and not in the first instance.

  7. John on December 18th, 2009 10:00 am

    What is amazing is how these people have managed to get away with telling blatant lies about the alleged holocaust for so long. The so called Holocaust survivors (and there appears to be so so many of them -WoW) can say whatever they want to all levels of fantasy and whacko imagination and the gullible and the meek in society appear to swallow it all hook line and sinker -by pure good faith alone. If someone says to me the shed was painted green then I want proof before I believe it. We are also lied to so much by those whom are supposed to lead us it has become a total joke. These so called survivors need to provide complete Evidence before a court of law before ever being allowed to have anything published or made into film.

    Carolyn has stood up and she has made her protest quite clear and we also must start to demand the truth and demand the German government remove these disgraceful thought crimes laws. What kind of holocaust written history is that if it needs a law to try and protect it. These very laws are themselves proof they are hiding something they do not want the German public to know -because when they find out they will suffer the obvious backlash for having lied to their own people and aided in this sick perverse collective guilt of Germans throughout the world.

    Thank you to Mr Sunic and Ms Jaeger for your contribution in the name of historical truth. Without truth we live a lie and it is the truth that WILL set us all free.

  8. Luis Magno on December 21st, 2009 7:52 pm
  9. Luis Magno on December 21st, 2009 7:53 pm

    Click on my name to catch my latest blog.

  10. Madeline Stanley on December 22nd, 2009 9:46 pm

    I had never heard of the Sunic Journal until I was told about Dr. Sunic’s interview with Ann Morrison. I listened to that with much interest because my ancestors were Karpaten Deutsch. They emigrated from Hungary before World War I, but I am in close touch with cousins whose families suffered horribly when they were expelled after World War II with so many other completely innocent German people. This grave injustice should certainly be recorded accurately in the history books.

    When I went on to listen to Dr. Sunic’s interview with Carolyn Yeagar, however, I was completely appalled. I had heard of such people but had never actually listened to one. I know a Holocaust victim. His family lived in our ancestral village and his Jewish father was a friend of my Roman Catholic grandfather. He told me his story which was similar to that of Elie Wiesel.


    Madeline Stanley

  11. Carolyn on December 23rd, 2009 10:05 pm

    Madeline -
    I’m so glad you expressed your reaction to the program. Thank you. And I’m honored to be the first such person (of my type) that you have listened to. I hope I didn’t give you too harsh of an introduction.

    Something that must be said, though, is that if I am the first such person, you are completely unfamiliar with Holocaust Revisionist arguments and scholarship. Your belief that it really did happen just as they say is based on your knowledge of one Jewish survivor. What if he is not telling you the truth? What if he is transmitting rumors that were circulating around during the time, and since? He himself survived – why? If his story is like Elie Wiesel’s, that is real reason to doubt it. Have you read Elie Wiesel’s books?

    I’m sorry, Madeline, but I can’t accept your word that it happened just as they say based on such flimsy evidence. Nor should you.

    I hope you will continue to look into the issue. All the best to you.

  12. Madeline Stanley on December 24th, 2009 9:47 am

    You assume my opinion is based on “flimsy evidence”. It is not.
    Have you ever spoken face-to-face with a survivor of the death camps and truly listened? I question your own “evidence”. In the interview you spoke a lot about a twenty-five year old “artist” who you seem to think is an authority, but when you were asked to explain a little more about him, you rambled along a bit but actually said very little.

    My knowledge of the Holocaust is based not only on what my Jewish friend told me firsthand. My German relatives have confirmed what he has described. They speak with horror how they witnessed the brutal arrest of his entire family. One cousin successfully smuggled bread into the brickyard where these Jewish neighbors were imprisoned without food before they were loaded on the train for Auschwitz. This is fact.

    Yes, I have read all the books of Elie Wiesel and many others written by both Jews and Gentiles that bear witness to the unspeakable crimes of the Nazis. I’m well aware that those devils and their accomplices murdered not only Jews but millions of others. My husband’s uncle, a Pole, died in Auschwitz.

    The Nazis also murdered countless numbers of Germans who tried to oppose them. It is because I know of these decent Germans and my own innocent German relatives who lived through the nightmare that I am able to take pride in my own German heritage. I only feel ashamed when I hear of people like you.

    Madeline Stanley

  13. Mishko Novosel on December 24th, 2009 1:25 pm


    When I was growing up as a kid, there was an old jewish guy that lived next door to us. He admitted to my mother that he had lied to the government about losing 20 family members in the holohoax, just so he could receive more money. The more family you lost, the more shekels you stole.

    Now let’s keep in mind, jews aren’t known for being honest; they are known for being money changers, liars and cheats. These people worship the $, and that is their god, and the hoax is a money making machine.

    Merry Christmas


  14. Keep fighting on December 26th, 2009 9:25 pm


    I’ve spoken to a Jewish man who was a child at Auschwitz. It was a containment camp. Murders and abuse occurred but it wasn’t a Holocaust by any stretch of the imagination. Hard but not impossible. Most Jews who didn’t pay the Jewish Kapos got beatings by the Communists inside.

    Gas Chamber not used for “killings” at Dachau

    WWII Propaganda about Gas Chambers May 3, 1945

    Read everything on this site:

    When you are done with this listen to this:

    The Holohoax is a Jewish scam like the US Federal Reserve or the Israeli-NeoCon attack on the USA known as 9/11.
    It was a cruel time. But, the English, French, Russian, Ukrainian, German, Romanian and Italian peoples suffered the most from the Jew Scams known as WWI and WWII — Not Jewish people. They gained a country.

  15. Steve on December 27th, 2009 12:06 am

    Madeline, listen to Dr. William Pierce and his brilliant and scholarly broadcasts (R.I.P. William):

    Thoughts On The Holocaust:

    The Holocaust Shakedown:

    The Significance Of The Holocaust:

    You could also listen to The Oldman, an excellent contributor to the Stormfront broadcast archives, explain his view of the “holocaust”:

    Part 1:

    Part 2:

  16. Carolyn on December 27th, 2009 6:22 pm

    It’s encouraging to see the several comments from those seeking to educate Madeline in a “fair and balanced” view of the holocaust.

    Madeline is still failing the test of logic. She claims she “knows firsthand” of the truth of the holocaust and the “unspeakable crimes of the Nazis,” calling them devils; but by only listening to one side, she can’t possibly “know” the truth of it. Therefore, she is fooling herself.

    Madeline should read the book “Debating the Holocaust” by Thomas Dalton, which is a fair and objective look at the arguments on both sides. If Madeline would give me her mailing address, or send it to VOR to pass on to me, I would mail her the book free, as I still have one extra copy.

    Madeline says her husband’s uncle, a Pole, died in Auschwitz. But she doesn’t tell us anything about this uncle. Was he a partisan fighting against the Wehrmacht? Was he a communist or communist sympathizer? Why was he sent to Auschwitz? Was he in Auschwitz or Birkenau or Monowitz? Most Poles were in Auschwitz, a labor camp, and they were not killed unless they were legally executed for crimes they committed. What did he die of? Perhaps another inmate killed him. To say that someone died in Auschwitz tells us nothing about the responsibility of the “Nazis” for his death. I know it’s well nigh impossible for someone with Madeline’s mindset to grasp, but it’s true nevertheless.

    I know about the brickyard in Munkacs (Hungary) where Jews were held for no longer than a week before being transported to Auschwitz. They were allowed to receive packages and food from the outside, from relatives, etc. — it didn’t need to be smuggled in. It was encouraged by the authorities, who had advised them to bring food sufficient for several days when they were taken from their homes. The Red Cross delivered food and other goods to them also. The reason for this was there were no kitchens set up in this temporary place.

    Madeline’s three witnesses does not add up to a lot of evidence of the truth of the holocaust narrative “just as they say it was.” That no doubt comes from reading all of Elie Wiesel’s books and “many others that bear witness to the unspeakable crimes of the Nazis.” But she’s read no books that tell another side of the story. These books are very convincing too … she should give them a chance. Without knowledge, there is no understanding.

    Madeline, I’ve not looked into the eyes of a holocaust survivor, in person. But I have looked into the eyes of a survivor of the German penal system, who was incarcerated for five years in the 90′s for simply being a member of a nationalist, right-wing political party and sending messages about party business to others. These outrageous laws are in place because of the belief, that you share, that the “Nazis” committed “unspeakable crimes.” His eyes were alert and highly intelligent, plus expressed good humor … unlike so many of these Jews who never stop whining about their year or six months in a camp, for which they are being compensated financially for the rest of their lives. My intelligent friend had to pay a large fine on top of his five years and got no assistance when he was released. We have these laws in Europe because the Jews, the “survivors”, insist on it.

  17. Madeline Stanley on December 27th, 2009 7:35 pm

    I believe Dr. Sunic will agree that Carolyn Yeager and I have each exercised our right to “freedom of speech” guaranteed by the First Amendment. I agree this is a good thing that must even be extended to crackpots. I have nothing further to say and will not be on this site again.

  18. Steve on December 27th, 2009 8:33 pm

    That’s too bad. It seems too many Whites today will ignore their instinct and abandon our heritage only to have the occasional shallow sense of self-righteousness over his/her peers.

    You see folks, Madeline doesn’t want to find out what is true. She wants to be TOLD what is “true” from the media machine that feeds poison into consensus. As many of you are aware, consensus is rife with facts and fallacies yet is the basis of common knowledge amongst the masses. For example; “they say…”.

    It’s like William Pierce said about lemmings: You can’t warn a lemming that following the herd will lead to demise by plummeting to its death. You must convince the lemming that the others have chosen a new path.

  19. Luis Magno on December 27th, 2009 11:32 pm

    European Americans have lost much of their ancestral memory and are losing their socio-cultural identity as native-born and immigrant Americans. The only effective defensive response to this ongoing cultural assaullt on the European race in America is the creation of a European-American socio-cultural identity coupled to an organized European-American political dynamic.

    This socio-cultural effort begins with a full embrace of the historical legacy of the Great Navigator, the Genoese-born Spanish admiral, Christopher Columbus. The starting point for an American cultural renaissance is October 12, 1492.

    Con vivencia y derecho,

    Luis Magno

  20. Carolyn on December 29th, 2009 1:49 pm

    Thanks for posting these awesome radio programs by Wm. Pierce and The Oldman. I’ve listened to all but the last (which is up right now) and they’re each excellent. I’ll keep them on file to recommend to others.

    I used to listen to Pierce’s broadcasts from the archives, and never found a bad or boring one. What a great ability he had to distill the essence of an issue and present a convincing argument.

    Let’s hope we can keep the holocaust revisionism discussion going on VOR and reach more people. I agree with The Oldman’s take that it’s so vitally important.

  21. Tim Harris on December 30th, 2009 11:37 pm

    Elie Wiesel’s Night is obviously false, so much so that someone’s reaction to it can serve as a litmus test of his honesty. Just start with the 42 mile run from Auschwitz when they left. A marathon and a half!