Compulsory Diversity News: Episode the Eleventh

January 14, 2009

VoR radio host Adrean Arlott brings you Compulsory Diversity News. In this episode:

  • Mansa Musa Obama: America prepares to spend its way out of debt.
  • CDN Special Report: Tad “Lumpy” Englebert reports from a Gazan hospital for white phosphorus victims. His skin grafts are doing nicely.

0 hour 31 min.


15 Responses to “Compulsory Diversity News: Episode the Eleventh”

  1. honkey tonk man on January 15th, 2009 8:07 pm

    I love this show. Some of the stuff you come up with is hillarious! Keep up the excellent work!
    …what is the name of the song and artist who performs that latin type dance song with the trumpet and the girl talking about walking on the english mans back?
    ….also you should do an interview with the “partriot dames”
    … one interview you are yourself and maybe another where you are in character

  2. Susie on January 15th, 2009 9:12 pm

    Honkey Tonk Man,
    I totally agree with you. He is brilliant! And I like the suggestion of Adrean being on our show!!! I hope he takes you up on that.

    Sometimes he reminds me of the voice that reads Winnie the Pooh (except this guy takes no pooh). What an expressive voice!!

  3. New America on January 16th, 2009 3:32 am

    Simply a totally devastating analysis of those who call themselves White Nationalists.

    And we need this.

    We need smart, articulate people to remind us of what we SHOULD be doing, versus what we ARE doing – or not, as the case may be.

    Brutal, ruthless, and takes no prisoners.

    Funny, too.

    I was listening and trying to match a possible general description to a possible name.

    Too much damn overlap, as if there are overlapping ineptitude syndromes manifesting all at once in one person.

    But I’m not going to mention names!


    Keep making fun of us.

    Hell, we deserve it….

    So far.

  4. Mary O on January 17th, 2009 10:04 am

    I greatly enjoy the show, but I have some reservation about the harshness with which the NS are being criticized. Given 60 years plus of media hype slurring the moral character of the German WW2 soldier as sexual sadists (from 1960s porno to “Sophie’s Choice” etc.), to don such a uniform is truly an act of courage. Further, such a political act demonstrates a faith in our people, the trust in White people themselves, the trust that we will eventually smarten up, and realize that the German NS were no different from our own great- or great-great-grandparents; and this trust in our people is key to true leadership. Even if one obsesses about what the neighbors think, like certain rather annoying nervous Nellies whom I won’t name, one must admit that no White can fail to be moved by the beautiful NS & German flags, the colors and ancient symbols of our common Indus roots. My only concern about NS regalia is that we don’t want to polarize the movement between Whites of British descent and Whites of German descent; Americans of British descent were no more responsible for the fire-bombing of Dresden than we Americans of today are responsible for the fire-bombing of Gaza. We deplore such atrocities, but no one listens to us.

  5. Mary O on January 17th, 2009 10:47 am

    How do you explain leftist pro-Zoggy activists, then? Does ZOG require that they all live in illegally sublet Upper West Side broom-closets, be 50 lbs overweight despite a diet limited to granola & Starbucks, and wear tattered jeans (too unshapely to be called merely “distressed” denim) or baggy corderoys, old khaki fatigue jackets covered with political buttons, long unkempt hair, love beads/ankhs, Grateful Dead tees, backpacks or chintz bags, and Berkies with socks, even past age 40????

  6. Susie on January 17th, 2009 11:58 am

    Mary O,
    You are very articulate. It isn’t the German flag or uniform the Jews are upset with… is what they represent. These things represent a strong conviction of nation and Jews believe in Jews. They have no viable flag or regimen or anything tangible to identify them by…..except Israel. And to me, that ‘state’ is a false flag.

    By the age of 10, most individuals have established reason, objectivity and compassion. Those that do not are mentally compromised and from them we get manic depressives, sociopaths and psychopaths….the stuff communists and socialists are made of.

  7. Mary O on January 17th, 2009 1:26 pm

    Susie, I basically agree, but I would not include manic depressives, who are simply the heirs to the bipolar gene. The illness is phasic, and they are often able to make great contributions during times of lesser intensity of their depression. Some scientists suggest that the fact that the illness afflicts about 3% of the population (a relatively high frequency of occurrence) may indicate that the presence of such individuals in a community offers some protective selective advantage; perhaps the seemingly boundless energy of such individuals in a “up” phase can be channeled effectively in certain disastrous situations. Many quite successful people suffer from this disorder; they often have an extraordinary ability to connect emotionally with other people, which often gives them an advantage at sales, or in other fields in which persuasion is key. Also, the bipolar syndrome is linked (genetically, some believe) to skill at creative writing. Famous writers believed to have been bipolar include Lord Byron, Balzac, William Faulkner, Scott Fitzgerald, Virginia Woolf, Hendrik Ibsen, Henry James, Ernest Hemingway, Hermann Hesse, Truman Capote and Graham Greene. BTW: Some physicians believe that the illness specifically afflicts the part of the brain concerned with time; not only does the depressed individual feel down, but he believes that he will always feel the same way. As Fitzgerald said, “In the dark night of the soul, it is always four o’clock in the morning.” Also, some psychiatrists believe that the stigma which our Western (read: White) societies attach to this illness contributes to making the illness more severe among Whites, and more likely to lead to suicide.

  8. New America on January 17th, 2009 5:30 pm

    in reply to Mary O:

    you wrote, in part:

    I greatly enjoy the show, but I have some reservation about the harshness with which the NS are being criticized.

    in reply:
    I suspect the very witty Mr. Arnott’s critiqie is not of the NS ideology, or the NSDAP Moment in the transformation of a collapsed state (when Hitler took office, the unemployment rate was above FIFTY percent).

    His critique was based on what certain self-proclaimed “Nazi’s” have done with the Form of NSDAP Germany – the uniforms, the regalia – and not the Substance, the Creative Force harnessed by the German people, that CREATED these Symbols as the new symbols for a new State.

    In good part, I suspect his references were to the ununiform “uniforms” of the self-proclaimed NSM, where men who were grossly obese wore replicas of the uniforms of the NSDAP, and the Brownshirts.

    I repeat – ununiform “uniforms,” odd color ranges for the various shades of “brown,” and wrinkled, unpressed clothing, all of which spoke volumes as to the true nature of the self-proclaimed “Nazis.”

    In contrast. we have Bill White, and the best who followed the spirit he was trying to develop with the ANSWP.

  9. Susie on January 17th, 2009 5:50 pm

    Mary O,
    You seem to know quite a bit about mental illnesses. I have a question. Manic Depressive, which people now call bi-polar, does it have these symptoms: I am the center of the universe, No one is right but me, Everyone else is wrong and the problem, Resenting strong people, wanting to be alone, insecure and accumulating material possessions?

    The reason I ask this is because I have known people who had terrible, unloved and abusive childhoods and they exhibit these symptoms when they are an adult. Doctors when prescribe depression drugs to mask these symptoms. Do you think these people are really manic depressive?

  10. Mary O on January 17th, 2009 10:38 pm

    Susie, Bi-polars, and other people with disabling depressive disorders often come from privileged and very respectable families; sometimes these more privileged individuals have more difficulty in coping with their problems than those who came from poor and tough backgrounds. One psychologist did some investigation into this apparent contradiction, and concluded that his patients who came from more troubled backgrounds did not have the additional problem of the mother who must feign love for him which she does not actually feel. In other words, the under-privileged child can cope more easily with a mother’s rejection; he may simply find a sympathetic grandmother, aunt or neighbor lady to meet his needs. However, the wealthier child will have a mother who falsely assumes love for him which she does not feel merely for the sake of proper appearances. This false “love” does far more psychological damage than simple maternal rejection. The victim may lose touch with his own true feelings, and therefore his true self. R.D. Laing once said that the last thought going through the mind of a person before he has a complete nervous breakdown is “Now I am going to be my real self.”

    To answer your question, depressives do tend to exhibit a certain materialism, insecurity, anger, rage and resentfulness. Often they simply don’t strike the proper balance in their relationships; either being way too pleasing, only to alternate with fits of resentment at the supposed need to please. They often enjoy solitude because when they are alone they may feel freer to be their true selves without any fear of rejection. Fiction writers are notoriously difficult to get along with because they tend to lash out at their friends, which often provokes feelings of guilt, which then intensifies the self-hatred and depression: the circular dynamic makes the illness intractable.

    The disease is caused by chemical imbalances in the brain, and often requires medical therapy. Today (JMO) too many psychologists try to push “happy pills” on their clients; but do not underestimate this illness. A true depressive (not just a person feeling down) cannot be talked out of the depression anymore than one could be talked out of bronchitis. Suggesting that their negative feelings will eventually pass away is thought to be helpful, due to the loss of time-sense, which I mentioned before.

    If the public were more aware of the illness, and understood it better, they would not react with such moral condemnation and disgust at the occasional difficult behavior of the depressive. People these days tend to immerse themselves in TV world where every human motive and behavior is explainable in a simple way; today’s Americans don’t really know as much about other people as previous generations. At work, we are not allowed to be ourselves, and esp. not allowed to express any right-wing opinion; often adults do not socialize very much outside of work which isolates them further. Our whole lives revolve around the false construct (i.e. formal employment), and the relationships are unreliable and often false. One example: on a commuter train I recently overheard this comment, “They called her into the office that morning, and he told her that she was fired. And, he was a ‘friend’ … “

  11. Susie on January 17th, 2009 11:26 pm

    Mary O,
    I read a book by Dr. Lyle Rossiter Jr. called ‘The Liberal Mind’ and what I really liked about it (besides the insight) was the fact that he presented all this information, much of it foreign to a layman, and I understood it. Some people have that ability. You definitely do.

    You explained very well behavior that most of us either do not understand, cannot accept or don’t care to learn about. You show, as Dr. Rossiter’s book did, that the love of a mother is very important in the emotional growth of a child.

    Thank you very much for writing this. I saved this explanation. It was an eye-opener.

  12. Chris K. on January 18th, 2009 9:53 pm

    This show is a boon to Voice of Reason. I have notice that the multi-culties, liberal lemmings and the jews will loose control and nearly throw a temper tantrum when their ideologies are not just factually smashed but also cleverly satirized as well.
    If presented with irrefutable facts then they will just shrug them off and/or play dumb then proceed to tell themselves that the truth doesn’t matter because they are morally correct. However, if they are rubbed with just a little bit of lampoon then they get real pissed and either clam up or storm off …likely to kick some poor little white kid in the balls. I don’t really understand why it works that that way but it is something that I have noticed.

  13. Kievsky on January 19th, 2009 1:18 pm

    I look for this show the first thing every week. I hope you are reading these comments, Mr. Arlott and know how much we all really do need, Compulsory Diversity News!

  14. Hayden on January 19th, 2009 3:17 pm

    It’s already past Hour the second of EST.

  15. Hibernian on March 1st, 2009 1:47 pm

    Another great show…Laughing out loud in many places. Adrean Arlott has some serious talent.