Top

Schaenk: War of Perception, Wed. 11/12

November 12, 2008

VoR radio host Peter Schaenk returns with a new broadcast. In it, Peter discusses Obama’s unenviable postion as a modern day Caesar…He is more valuable dead than alive. Also in the show:

  • Gay marriage,
  • Rahm Emmanuel,
  • The Mortgage Crisis and up to the minute news.

1 hour 59 min.

Comments

55 Responses to “Schaenk: War of Perception, Wed. 11/12”

  1. K-Sensor on November 13th, 2008 1:30 am

    Peter not sure if you’d take my up on the offer but I think ti’s very important to use words to claim the argument.

    When talking about white people wanting to keep their bastion, I’d say use the term, “Racial Protectionists.” It’s a acceptable term to most bar those that have race mixed children or have married into another incompatible race.

    White Supremacists is a term that is too offensive as it implies the annihilation of others. It’s liken to Tikkun Olam philosophy of remove most of the Gentiles to bring harmony..

  2. Z.O.G. on November 13th, 2008 1:41 am

    K-Sensor,

    Peter doesn’t read the posts on this site anymore, so writing messages to him is a complete waste of time.

  3. K-Sensor on November 13th, 2008 1:49 am

    Zog, I’m hoping he’ll be temped to read.

    Regarding Carter, he’s a big advocate of community housing projects where people get together and build homes for the so called needy. Usually single mothers.

    Who will build the homes once the Mexicans earn themselves outside the menial work? More Mexicans? The future doesn’t look good.

  4. K-Sensor on November 13th, 2008 2:00 am

    Peter I think you should be doing stories on the coming collapse of the Internet. IT’s a story theme that will hit big time in not too distance future.

    With the economy and crash in share prices, .DotCom companies wont survive. Most internet sites are non profitable and can only continue with the either inside sponsoring from the owners pockets, or emergency measures.

    Once companies stop paying for advertising, it’s all over as we know it.

    Start talking about this topic before Alex Jones and DBS do!

  5. Allan Hampton on November 13th, 2008 10:11 am

    Yep, it’s a fact Jews have control of Congress – yet do not Hire (elect) any of them – and also Jews have control of most American’s mind.

    Allan

  6. 2eyedJack on November 14th, 2008 12:17 pm

    After a while, the increasingly disdainful comments you direct towards White Nationalists grow thin. If it is not the White Nationalists, however disorganized as you may erroneously perceive them to be, who will rid our once great nation of the judaic pestilence that has nearly destroyed us, then who, pray tell, will it be? You advocate learning from the negroes who have, as you put it, covertly worked their way into positions of political influence. What you conveniently failed to mention is that the negroes have been coached, directed, supported and financed by the jew, and it is because of this very backing they have gone as far as they have – not because they are smarter or cleverer than White people. You say that you are merely a White American who supports the values of his forefathers. If by your forefathers you mean the founders of this country, I do believe that to a T they all made it perfectly clear that they were establishing a country for White people and their progeny, not for jews, blacks, mexicans, asians or any other race. That sounds pretty White and nationalistic to me.

    I have listened to several of your broadcasts, and your apparent desire to appease our enemies and get along with everyone plainly reeks of multiculturalism. Furthermore, I have heard you advocate speaking English only, which in itself is laudable; however, in the next breath you play a CD of some unintelligible, screeching Romanian. Also, why do you deride those White Nationalists/Separatists who would chose to live in a remote town of a mostly White area such as Idaho or Montana? The sneering contempt with which you make mention of those people does not in any way enhance your message if that is your intent.

    My last comment is in the form of a few short questions. On repeated occasions (almost always, I dare say) when referring to other White people you do not agree with, even though they are committed and engaged in our battle against the jew, you will invariably refer to them as “they”. Why do you prefer to make that distinction? “I, we” on this side and “they” on the other. Is that not the attitude and tactics of a splitter or provocateur?

  7. Z.O.G. on November 14th, 2008 4:46 pm

    Great post, 2eyedJack. I agree completely.

  8. New America on November 14th, 2008 6:46 pm

    in reply to 2eyedjack:

    This broadcast, and the one that immediately preceded it, was very substantial, and said much more – MUCH more – than you seem to have grasped.

    I’m working on comments for both of them; for now, I’ll address your issues.

    you wrote:

    After a while, the increasingly disdainful comments you direct towards White Nationalists grow thin. If it is not the White Nationalists, however disorganized as you may erroneously perceive them to be, who will rid our once great nation of the judaic pestilence that has nearly destroyed us, then who, pray tell, will it be?

    in reply:
    The self-identified “White Nationalists” have a track record that seems to never get far from zero; just ask Matt Hale about that, or, for that matter, Edgar Steele.

    Better, ask the Klan members who appeared in public wearing white satin bedsheets and pillowcases, just how much THEY have accomplished.

    AS well, how many members of the NSM have been elected to Congress, or even to dogcatcher?

    A very good piece was done on VNN concerning an issue Briseis addressed on a VNN radio show called “Free Talk Live,” the appalling lack of Adult Masculine competence of the young men who seem attracted to “White Nationalism.”

    With the exception of “Hoosier,” no one attempted to join this critically important discussion.

    Why do you suppose that is?

    I suspect it is because, in good part, even addressing the issue in the most vague of generalities speaks volumes as to the Path of Impotence that has been chosen by all but a few of the self-proclaimed “White Nationalists.”

    So, the solution of ridding our nation of the influences of the Judaics – where their power truly derives from – won’t be done by men who look back in time to, say, Hitler, and do not ask themselves why and how Hitler did what he did, and what lessons can be usefully applied to our time and place.

    So, they do things that are simply not remotely productive, and they reap what they sow – “Folly, and failure.”

    you wrote:

    You advocate learning from the negroes who have, as you put it, covertly worked their way into positions of political influence. What you conveniently failed to mention is that the negroes have been coached, directed, supported and financed by the jew, and it is because of this very backing they have gone as far as they have – not because they are smarter or cleverer than White people.

    in reply:
    This is, at best, a distinction without a difference

    Negroes have “succeeded” because they are the hand puppets of the Judaics, no doubt; yet, their success is based on adopting a Jewish political tool called Universalism.

    It’s the clever use of that tool that makes them remotely effective at their true purpose, the removal of Christianity and the White Race from the planet.

    Its the tool that we accepted, blindly, and will be used to try to destroy us from within.

    you wrote:

    You say that you are merely a White American who supports the values of his forefathers. If by your forefathers you mean the founders of this country, I do believe that to a T they all made it perfectly clear that they were establishing a country for White people and their progeny, not for jews, blacks, mexicans, asians or any other race. That sounds pretty White and nationalistic to me.

    in reply:
    Yet, the values of our the Founders have been perverted.

    The Revolutions of 1860, and 1933, made that all too clear.

    you wrote:

    I have listened to several of your broadcasts, and your apparent desire to appease our enemies and get along with everyone plainly reeks of multiculturalism. Furthermore, I have heard you advocate speaking English only, which in itself is laudable; however, in the next breath you play a CD of some unintelligible, screeching Romanian.

    in reply:
    I tend to agree.

    Introductory music was needed in the early days of radio, for the stations along the line to be properly set up for the national feeds. Now, such music is largely superfluous, except for the breaks where the host reads the latest news and emails.

    Worst of all at this, by the way, is Metzger.

    you wrote:

    Also, why do you deride those White Nationalists/Separatists who would chose to live in a remote town of a mostly White area such as Idaho or Montana? The sneering contempt with which you make mention of those people does not in any way enhance your message if that is your intent.

    in reply:
    Peter doesn’t “deride” the people who choose to live in Idaho, Montana, or anywhere in the Northwest Republic.

    He does point our that self-proclaimed White Nationalists aren’t getting much done there, either, in terms of political reform.

    That’s about the usual for White Nationalism in terms of political representation.

    you wrote:

    My last comment is in the form of a few short questions. On repeated occasions (almost always, I dare say) when referring to other White people you do not agree with, even though they are committed and engaged in our battle against the jew, you will invariably refer to them as “they”. Why do you prefer to make that distinction? “I, we” on this side and “they” on the other. Is that not the attitude and tactics of a splitter or provocateur?

    in reply:
    In fact, this is the “attitude” of one who wishes to separate those who are trying to make it happen, from those who do not know what is happening, and do not care to know.

    The prefer to play “Dress-Up” in bedsheets and pillowcases, surplus store camoflauge, Nazi uniforms (ILL-FITTING Nazi uniforms, at that!), and all manner of thrift shop clothing.

    Those are the “they,” who, with precious few exceptions, have done more harm to White Nationalism that our Racial Enemies ever did.

    And, if the truth divides, then, please, let’s have more such “splitters and entreprenuers.”

    On the side of the Truth, we can begin to develop a Universalist model to get our side of The Story out.

    Oh, by the way…

    “Our Story?”

    It’s The Greatest Story Ever Told.

    It’s just needs the greatest people to live it.

  9. New America on November 14th, 2008 7:52 pm

    I’d like to quickly supplement my comments concerning Edgar Steele.

    My respect for his is without bounds.

    I mentioned him in the post above to cite an Authority on how we have managed to squander what have become Insurmountable Opportunities.

    Steele might not have seen it all, but he has seen all of it that matters to understand Linder’s Paradox:

    The Best Idea In The World Has The Worst Damn People Claiming To Represent It.

    Reread Linder’s Paradox again – slowly.

    Look at the SELF-PROCLAIMED “White Nationalist LEADERS,” and see how these are truly people you would not want to be in the same room.

    Now, look at the REAL White Nationalist LEADERS – those who LIVED the life, earned the title, and DID NOT SEEK the title:

    Ford.

    Lindbergh.

    Patton.

    I can go on and on; just look at the greatest men of the Twentieth Century, and there WE are – at our best.

    Another interview with Steele might be useful to see just what seems to be wrong with so many of us.

    I suspect it’s pretty simple:

    We have accepted the terms, phrases and definitions of our Racial Enemies, and thus, are blocked from greater effectiveness.

    When you allow your Racial Enemies to define you, you have lost the battle before you take to the field of battle.

    No amount of costumes can compensate for the folly of those who wear the wrong clothes, for the wrong reasons, all the while promulgating the wrong Ideas – and the wrong Ideals – for our Cultural Moment.

  10. New America on November 15th, 2008 12:09 am

    One more quick idea for Peter:

    One interview with Edgar Steele addressing the issues of how we never have become a “Movement,” despite every possible incentive to do so, and – in particular – how we have been constructively undermined at all possible points.

    Harold Covington – our best analyst, and creator of the Northwest Republic Analytical Model – has argued that every time White Nationalists start to get something going, it is quickly disrupted, and neutralized.

    Another good choice for interviews – Tom Metzger.

    Why Metzger?

    He realizes the failures of the past, and supports the Fourteen Words while explcitly rejecting the “88″ part of things.

    He has become a kind of latter-day Jack London, and is a much different sounding man from what he was years ago.

    Just some ideas!

  11. Allan Hampton on November 15th, 2008 12:24 am

    Is it possible that all the “movement” ideas or agendas are incorrect from the beginning?

    I’ve heard a lot of talk about Jews, Blacks, Illuminati, Banksters, Hate, Extremists, and Religion which may be correct on those subjects but out of context in correcting government.

    It is government the so-called “movement” wants to correct is it not?

    Doing the same thing and expecting a different result is an indication of stupidity.

    Allan

  12. New America on November 15th, 2008 3:35 am

    in reply to Allen Hampton:

    you wrote:

    Is it possible that all the “movement” ideas or agendas are incorrect from the beginning?

    I’ve heard a lot of talk about Jews, Blacks, Illuminati, Banksters, Hate, Extremists, and Religion which may be correct on those subjects but out of context in correcting government.

    in reply:
    The historical choices have been to blame “Others” – all usually code words for the Judaics – without dealing with the fact that power – which our nominal representatives CLAIM to want – has been GIVEN to them, by us.

    It is our Power that we have given to them, one Word at a time, one Idea at a time, one Vote at a time, and one Dollar at a time.

    It is our Choice to take it back, if we so choose, and to do so intelligently.

    That seems to be the the part that we miss, and I think there is a pretty obvious reason for this.

    Our “Leaders,” with precious few exceptions, seem to be little more than carrires of one subpotent False Flag after another.

    The fault for this is ours, for they look forever to a past that never was, and want to live there.

    No.

    you wrote:

    It is government the so-called “movement” wants to correct is it not?

    Doing the same thing and expecting a different result is an indication of stupidity.

    Allan

    in reply:
    Good question.

    The correct answer should be, “Yes, the ‘Movement’ wants to change the government.”

    The correct answer is, “No, the ‘Movement’ simply wishes to be entertained by dreams of power suddenly accruing to them.”

    This ties in with an excellent point Peter made.

    They want an easy, painless way to have – this is the Key – Power WITHOUT earning it through responsible behavior.

    They assume, somehow, as if by magic, that our intellectual arguments will suddenly arouse the White Majority – STILL! – to go, “Damn! These guys are right! We’ve got to do what these wonderful people say! Thanks for waking us up on the issue of Race, wonderful people!”

    No.

    We need a situation that gets their attention, and we need a Universalist message to get them to feel good about supporting us, and doing something about supporting us.

    Peter is right.

    One and all KNOW Obama is a Black Nationalist, but he masked it in the words and pictures of Christian American universalism.

    And it WORKED!

    That’s right; he took what was ours, and made it his, and used it to get a majority of the WHITE VOTERS to support him.

    It is simply a fact that the Republicans win – nationally – when they run on the issue of Race, WHEN it is matched to Universalist Ideals and Examples.

    When they specifically run AGAINST Race, then they offer nothing more than the same policies and practices the Democrats do, even if they use the words of Universalism.

    It is THAT simple, and yet, that requires a degree of maturity, discipline and responsibility that is beyond our nominal public representatives – with precious few exceptions.

    That is why I am such a strong advocate of Covington’s Northwest Republic Analytical Model.

    It is positive, and guides us to develop the skills and talents, locally, that we would need IF we ever chose to lay the foundation for our own nation that is explicitly based on Race.

    Everyone, it seems, wants Magic to strike, even as we have become the ONE Racial Group that everyone else is free to condemn, attack, and just totally hate at all places, at all times.

    Duke made the best points on this: the two parties will offer virtually FREE workshops for us in all stages of developing, managing, and winning an election.

    No detail is too small for these FREE workshops – yard signs, advertising, you name it.

    OUR guys won’t attend these courses.

    OUR guys bitch and moan about the Jew-controlled banking system.

    Yet, they won’t take the virtually free courses on the American Banking Association website, or learn how to do as well, much less better, as students of finance, and commerce.

    Yet, they expect to Awaken in a White Nation, with themselves as Leaders – position that have not earned, and do not deserve.

    So, they overcompensate, with mismatched, ununiform uniforms, and scream and holler words that don’t even unite White people.

    They go home, feel really good, have another couple dozen beers, look in the mirror and see either the young Robert E. Lee, the young Nathan Bedford Forrest, or the young Adolph Hitler.

    NONE of them see the young Andrew Carnegie, the young Henry Ford, the young Theodore Vail, or the young James Tiberius Kirk.

    Always they address the Forms of Power, without the Substance of Responsibility, that allows greater power to accrue to them as a result of their greater effectiveness in responsibly meeting the needs of the Community.

    The problem remains: their definition of the Forms of Power is in ununiform uniforms, worn by morbidly obese people who look more like Tobacco Road, than they do the Southfork Mansion.

    They then wonder why no one that matters is attracted to them, or our Cause.

    They wonder, but I don’t.

    Until they develop a Positive Universalist message, and work to develop political organizations, economic organizations, and a new Culture, they will remain the unwanted Children of Yesterday.

    Fine.

    Their dreams of power and glory will match the Southern Exiles who moved to Argentina, interbred, and left what remained of the Old South to remain as mindlessly repeated dances and social customs of the Antebellum South.

    White rituals, performed by non-White people.

    Miss Scarlett and Master Rhett would be ashamed, and rightly so.

    Kind of like so many of our “organizations,” if you think about it.

    Do you REALLY think Hitler won, and rebuilt a shattered nation, with FIFTY PERCENT unemployment, by wearing a brownshirt, with a red swastika armband?

    No.

    Hitler, Speer, Schacht, Mannstein, and, in later days, Rockwell, and Pierce, would ALL wear custom tailored, Hart, Schafner and Marx three-piece suits, organize intelligently designed political and economic organizations, and speak in terms of Christian Western universalism.

    Like President Barack Obama.

    And, they would have a chance to be at least as effective as…

    President Barack Obama.

  13. Allan Hampton on November 15th, 2008 8:52 am

    You may be historically correct but in such rants there is nothing on the order of correcting a wayward criminal government.

    The “people” must enforce the Constitution, stupid. It is the Constitution, when enforced, that “Rules” USA governments.

    Allan

  14. Yippy on November 15th, 2008 1:51 pm

    Avoid idolising the Constitution. It was written by Freemasons whose vision was of a Freemasonic New World Order that we inhabit today. It was the Amendments, not in the original Constitution, that people love so much anyway.

  15. Yippy on November 15th, 2008 1:52 pm

    And which are by far most significant in preserving freedom of speech (i.e. no “hate speech”, leftist Marcuse restriction), gun rights, etc.

  16. New America on November 15th, 2008 3:31 pm

    in reply to Allan Hampton:

    you wrote:

    You may be historically correct but in such rants there is nothing on the order of correcting a wayward criminal government.

    in reply:
    It’s pretty hard to define the government as “criminal” when they have the power to define the term, and the power to back it up.

    Even if the government were as “criminal” as you make it out to be, even if you are correct, it would not matter.

    Remember, all of the “White Nationalists” who speak of “taking America back,” and getting the old shooting iron, and the old Chevy Nova, and “showing ‘them’ how The Game is played,” are simply subpotent incompetents, with their pathetic fantasizing of how they would “take America back.”

    If WE “corrected ourselves,” personally and as a Race, then “correcting the government” would take care of itself automatically, organically, quietly and peacefully.

    In short, just like it would under Covington’s Northwest Republic Analytical Model.

    Just like it would, and just like it should.

    you wrote:

    The “people” must enforce the Constitution, stupid. It is the Constitution, when enforced, that “Rules” USA governments.

    Allan

    in reply:
    Ah.

    Worship of “The Constitution.”

    Which one?

    The original, with no Amendments?

    Or, to give the Constitution greater integrity, should we formally incorporate the Bill of Rights into the Constitution, say, with a new Amendment?

    Would you like your Constitution pre-Fourteenth Amendment, or post-Fourteenth Amendment?

    Remember what Justice Brandeis, a totally committed Zionist, said of the Constitution as part of the Revolution of 1933:

    “The Constitution means what WE say it means.”

    Think he was speaking as a Zionist when he said that?

    So do I.

    So, it looks like “the people” ARE enforcing the Constitution, and those are the people that matter; in this case, Zionists, or Talmudists, in all but name.

    I’ll address those who worship the Constitution directly.

    Just note this:

    The Constitution was a Creation of the White Race, and, when it has served the Race and is no longer necessary, the White Race will Create a newer, better, tool for organizing governance at the national level.

    That’s REALLY all the Constitution is, you know:

    Just the Articles of Incorporation for a new corporation.

    Do you choose to worship Articles of Incorporation?

    Why?

  17. New America on November 15th, 2008 3:56 pm

    For those who worship the Constitution:

    Why do you worship Articles of Incorporation, without the vital power of the Bill of Rights?

    I’ve met with many of you over the years, and your faith in the power of a piece of paper that organizes governance for a State – and that is ALL it does – is heartrending in its pathos.

    When I think of what you could have done for yourselves, your Families and your Race instead, I am just driven to tears of anger.

    Think of what you could have done in the meanwhile, for them, and yourself.

    Instead, you engaged in Talmudic sophistry, to no good end.

    This ties back to Edgar Steele, and an earlier interview with Peter, where one of you ignorant, subpotent fools was citing one legal theory after another in support of one motion after another to win a case based on “Constitutional” law.

    Steele was as gracious as anyone could be, and much more gracious than I.

    Steele knows what the rest of us don’t, so I’ll cue you in on a little bit of the legal facts of life.

    One, the Judge has MUCH more power than you can imagine. All of your brilliantly argued motions and pleadings, and all of the hours put into developing them, are all reduced to nothing when the Judge goes, “DENIED.”

    That’s pretty much it.

    Oh, by the way, if you don’t like what the Judge just did, you can appeal it, but that costs you a lot more money, too.

    And do you know what the appelate Judge can say?

    “DENIED.”

    Litigation is an aspect of economic war, and it always costs more than you thought.

    Oh, and those damn idiots who want Steele to work pro bono?

    First, given the caliber of client – idiots who argue with you on the basis of legal articles written in the ‘American Free Press’ newspaper – pro bono means you lose twice.

    First, you can’t make any money, and second, you lose the opportunities to make money -in short, you are doubly damned.

    Read what Gerry Spence has to say about HIS pro bono experiences; even if you win a case at trial, you lose it at the appellate level.

    So, you’re out twice.

    And, the subpotent idiots on our side have no idea that, under pro bono, even if a lawyer gives his time and skill for free, he still incurs significant out of pocket costs – transcripts cost FIVE dollars a PAGE, and each page is quadruple spaced, from what I see.

    Witnesses cost money, just hotel room and board costs money, and Steele is far too much of a gentleman to tell you the worst part.

    He is, but I’m not.

    The WORST part of pro bono is how ungrateful, your clients are.

    So, you’ve lost money, you’ve lost the money you might have made, and your clients are either ungrateful, or hold you in active contempt for not making their dreams a Reality soon enough.

    After a while – well, I’d like to hear Steele’s Advice for Young Lawyers, particularly in dealing with pro bono cases…

    And clients.

    Now, everyone go to Steele’s website, and download his indispensable mp3 of “Let’s get Small.”

    THEN, “Let’s Get smart,” and listen to what Peter has to say about us, our situation, and how to make it better.

  18. Allan Hampton on November 15th, 2008 6:46 pm

    There is no middle of the road; you guys are either very easily misled or of the enemy camp. Either way you are repeating enemy rhetoric or dancing to an enemy anti-America tune. Does it relieve your guilt complex for failure to do your duty in citizenship by blaming “Freemasons”, or any other group, besides Congress, for government unconstitutionality or criminality?

    Crimes by government Officials are defined in the Constitution in Article II, Section 4 as: “The President, Vice President, and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, and other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

    Then the last paragraph of Article VI says: “The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”

    The Oath is to the Constitution and not to the Articles of Confederation. Then Article I, Section 2 clearly says Members of the House (Lawmakers) shall be chosen by the people of the several States every two years. That means the People (Americans) are obligated to Hire Lawmakers every two years and hire Lawmakers that will honor the Constitution’s Oath of Office; Lawmakers cannot, constitutionally, be hired to do anything else.

    Arms, no the Second Amendment does NOT endorse or encourage using Arms in revolt from government. Article I, Section 8, Clause 15. “To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;”

    Arms are strictly for defense from physical attack.

    Allan

  19. Allan Hampton on November 15th, 2008 6:49 pm

    Add:

    Litigants are beggars, only Citizen Jurors have any power in any government court.

    Allan

  20. New America on November 15th, 2008 8:11 pm

    in reply to Allan Hampton:

    you wrote:

    There is no middle of the road; you guys are either very easily misled or of the enemy camp. Either way you are repeating enemy rhetoric or dancing to an enemy anti-America tune.

    in reply:
    You know, Allan, Movement Past, as I like to call it, failed spectacularly at accomplishing much of anything. Rockwell was showing a degree of success by moving to adopting a more effective profile within the nation.

    This includes doing what PRESIDENT Barack Obama has done; using the terms of Christian Universalism to get accepted.

    It worked for him, it will work for us.

    Remember, the best, brightest and most powerful of the Republican Party worked hand-in-glove with the Democrats to stop Dr. David Duke from greater political success – and it TOOK all of them to make that happen.

    And, by the way, it looks like our Racial Enemies have been calling the tune, and writing the new verses.

    Our response to this has been one of Childish Bewilderment.

    “How? How did they do this?”

    Simple.

    In the words of thinkers from James Burnham, to Dr. Sam Francis, to Terrible Tommy Metzger – pay attention, now:

    WE LET THIS HAPPEN TO US.

    This is simply OUR Talents, OUR Abilities, OUR Creative Gifts and OUR Creative Energy being turned AGAINST us, with our total support.

    We are not going to be able to blame our way out of THIS.

    This will require a LOT of work – disciplined, focus, intelligent, Racially focused WORK.

    A good place to start developing the Mindset we will need is Harold Covington’s “A DIstant Thunder.”

    And, with Covington, there’s more where that came from, and it is eminently worthwhile.

    you wrote:

    Does it relieve your guilt complex for failure to do your duty in citizenship by blaming “Freemasons”, or any other group, besides Congress, for government unconstitutionality or criminality?

    in reply:
    These pathetic fantasies lead to no idea whatsoever of “guilt,” as my loyalty is not to the Constitution, which “is whatever we (Zionist judges with no check on their power) say it is.”

    My loyalty is to my God, my Race – which is my organic Nation – and the best of my Family.

    The Constitution does not care for you, at all.

    Again, it is simply the Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation known as “The United States of America.”

    You know, the CSA’s Jefferson Davis was quite the scholar of the Constitution, and you see how much good THAT did him.

    As well, Alan, it’s a shame that “Citizen Jurors” put the hammer DOWN on some of the “White Nationalist” community.

    See http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/11/14/klan.sued.verdict/index.html

    Once again, we see the wisdom of Peter’s last two shows; well, actually, all of them.

    We see just how horrifically STUPID these idiots are.

    Oh, by the way, on their website they state that they are all for the Constitution, and are exercising their “rights” under said Constitution; unspoken, apparently is that these “Constitutional” rights are found in the Bill of Rights, which are NOT the same as the Constitution.

    Metzger went to the heart of what Jack London wrote of about a century ago, and has made some really astute comments on what we have accepted as dogma for some time.

    You see, right now, we don’t have “God-given inalienable Rights.”

    Metzger’s right when he says we have PRIVILEGES, which are masked as “rights.”

    Right to “liberty?”

    I’ll have to tell Bill White about that one.

    Right to the “Pursuit of happiness?”

    I’ll have to tell the people who were incarcerated for using marijuana about that one.

    Right to “life?”

    Have to call the guys on Death Row and tell them a mistake has been made; the Constitution says they have this “right” that shuts down Death Row.

    Metzger has it right:

    YOU ONLY HAVE THE RIGHTS YOU CAN ENFORCE.

    Period.

    And, with his custom tailored Hart, Schaffner and MArx three-piece suits, and his eloquent use of the terms and definitions of Christian Universalism in his speech, everyone had better keep an eye on the Executive Orders (I missed that part of the Constitution that addresses Executive Orders. Are they like laws, or something?) dealing with the damn few “rights” we think we have.

  21. roscoe on November 16th, 2008 1:13 am

    Hitler was a judaic>

  22. New America on November 16th, 2008 1:59 am

    in reply to Roscoe:

    you wrote:

    Hitler was a judaic.

    in reply:
    Hitler is dead.

    Let’s move forward.

    While we can…

  23. New America on November 16th, 2008 2:44 am

    Two words for Peter as an overarching theme – and a Goal.

    Christian Civilization.

    That pretty much includes the best, and discards the rest.

    “What are you fighting for?”

    “Christian Civilization – for my grandparents, and my grandchildren yet unborn.”

  24. Allan Hampton on November 16th, 2008 7:50 am

    Fighting for Christianity? No, that’s the wrong battle. God is a big boy and doesn’t need man or man’s government fighting his battles.

    The war of words is about control of the “Government” of the USA and the “Mind” of Americans.

    Hitler was correct, for Germany.

    In reply to New America:

    I’ve read George Lincoln Rockwell and he took his fight against Jews to the streets, and I’ve read David Duke. But, Rockwell and Duke are wrong in the same respect as most everyone else in the so-called “movement”. Getting elected to office is not the answer to unconstitutionality. The USA Government is not ruled by a King, or any one person, but is ruled by a Congress of 535 men and women.

    Obama was elected simply because the People no longer vote to support the Republic but vote to support the Democracy. Yes, “We let this (brainwashing) happen” over a period of many years.

    Yes indeed, Americans are embroiled in a race war and that war has been going on for many years too.

    The Constitution does not care for you is correct because the Constitution is not about “you”, it is about a “government” of a country.

    “God-given inalienable Rights.”

    Did the Rights expressed in the Bill of Rights come from God? Specifically the Right to Hire (elect) Lawmakers and sit on a Citizen Jury to dispense justice to accused (by government) fellow citizens?

    YOU ONLY HAVE THE RIGHTS YOU CAN ENFORCE.

    The Right of Conscience is probably the greatest Right and can you suggest what external force controls an American’s Right of Conscience. For instance what force controls an American’s Right of Conscience when serving on a Jury or voting to elect a Lawmaker?

    Keep charging windmills Don Quixote, I’m sure you will capture one someday.

    Allan

  25. Yippy on November 16th, 2008 10:29 am

    “There is no middle of the road; you guys are either very easily misled or of the enemy camp.”

    Strange statement.

  26. roscoe on November 16th, 2008 2:30 pm

    Oboma is not legally elected until the Electoral College votes on Dec 15. Why has he established an ‘Office of the Pres Elect’? There has never been such a thing.

  27. roscoe on November 16th, 2008 2:34 pm

    Shankus– when you interview K Mc Donald can you discuss the v2 ‘church’ and it’s roll in illegal immigration. Does the Prof understand the schismatical, apostate, judeo-masonic, anti-christ sect that presently inhabits the buildings of Vatican City.? etc…

  28. New America on November 16th, 2008 5:29 pm

    in reply to Allen Hampton:

    you wrote:

    Fighting for Christianity? No, that’s the wrong battle. God is a big boy and doesn’t need man or man’s government fighting his battles.

    The war of words is about control of the “Government” of the USA and the “Mind” of Americans.

    Hitler was correct, for Germany.

    in reply:
    Christianity was the living foundation of the West, Western Civilization, and the Culture that created the Constitution.

    A common thought among the colonists was “No King But Jesus.”

    And, Hitler was right, until he was wrong. He was briliantly correct because he freed the unique Creative abilities of the German people. His error was not that he was ruthless, but that he was not ruthless enough. Dunkirk should have been the creation of the largest POW system in modern history, and not the freeing of the people who would return, and try to destroy their Racial kinsmen, in service of the Asiatic Hive Consciousness known as Judaism.

    you wrote:

    In reply to New America:

    I’ve read George Lincoln Rockwell and he took his fight against Jews to the streets, and I’ve read David Duke. But, Rockwell and Duke are wrong in the same respect as most everyone else in the so-called “movement”. Getting elected to office is not the answer to unconstitutionality. The USA Government is not ruled by a King, or any one person, but is ruled by a Congress of 535 men and women.

    in reply:
    The growth of the Unitary Executive – with continuing resolutions destroying the institutional checks and balances of the budget process, and Executive Orders replacing legislation – makes Kingly rule rather more likely, than not.

    Remember, the King, and all but a handful of the members of Congress, are hand-in-glove with the Judaics, and, for the most part, are mere shabbos goys.

    Obama was elected simply because the People no longer vote to support the Republic but vote to support the Democracy. Yes, “We let this (brainwashing) happen” over a period of many years.

    Yes indeed, Americans are embroiled in a race war and that war has been going on for many years too.

    in reply:
    Returning to our Positive Theory of Race, it is of the first importance that Obama was elected by a majority of the White vote.

    Rabbi Marcus Eli Ravage must be gloating with joy at how easy it was to destroy America, without firing a shot.

    Looks like the Constitution didn’t seem to slow them down for a minute. After all, as the Zionist Brandeis said, “The Constitution means what WE say it means.”

    you wrote:

    The Constitution does not care for you is correct because the Constitution is not about “you”, it is about a “government” of a country.

    in reply:
    Again, the Constitution is something our Race CREATED, to serve our Race.

    THAT is the purpose of the document.

    And, to worship that document is the functional equivalent of Idolatry.

    Worse – the Idol has been under the control of the Jews for some time, as have we, in all but name.

    you wrote:
    “God-given inalienable Rights.”

    Did the Rights expressed in the Bill of Rights come from God? Specifically the Right to Hire (elect) Lawmakers and sit on a Citizen Jury to dispense justice to accused (by government) fellow citizens?

    in reply:
    I think you are confusing two concepts, those of “God-given rights,” and “inalienable rights.”

    God may have Inspired those rights, but, I can assure you, ordinary Men can take them away with the stroke of a pen.

    And they have.

    And, for that matter, in fact, the Judge usually decides the law of the case, and thus further alienates the rights of the Jury. Indeed, as part of the jury selection process, the jurors are asked if they will accept the opinions of teh judge as being the source of law for the case. Those that say “No” are usually “excused” from jury duty.

    you wrote:

    YOU ONLY HAVE THE RIGHTS YOU CAN ENFORCE.

    in reply:
    Thank you for quoting me quoting Tom Metzger.

    Good to see we can agree on something!

    you wrote:

    The Right of Conscience is probably the greatest Right and can you suggest what external force controls an American’s Right of Conscience. For instance what force controls an American’s Right of Conscience when serving on a Jury or voting to elect a Lawmaker?”

    in reply:
    The problem is, most of your choices in those cases are false choices, as you are ALLOWED to choice between choices that have already been made for you.

    Voting for a Democrat?

    You’re voting for amnesty for the illegals, the merger of America with Mexico in all but name, more Affirmative Action, and a skyrocketing national debt.

    Voting for a Republican?

    You’re voting for amnesty for the illegals, the merger of America with Mexico in all but name, more Affirmative Action, and a skyrocketing national debt.

    ACTING for the greatness of the RACE?

    Then your concern is not the vote, per se, but the Creation of a better system, a better Order for our Age.

    THAT is not accepting the false choice offered to your by our Judaic handlers, but the most conscientious choice you can make – for your Family, your Posterity, and your Race.

    you wrote:

    Keep charging windmills Don Quixote, I’m sure you will capture one someday.

    Allan

    in reply:
    “America” in all of its historical phases, has been a stepping-stone for our Race; not the End for us, but a Means to a much greater End than we can imagine.

    Offer your Posterity the Forms that make you happy; have them worship the Constitution all you want.

    I am offering my Posterity “Honor, Discipline, and the Stars,” in the hope that they will walk steadily, confidently, “Toward The Stars.”

    And, one day, THEIR Posterity might, just might, Walk Among The Stars.

  29. Stu Gavin on November 17th, 2008 3:44 am

    Everyone is asking what happened with Schaenk?

    Isn’t it obvious?

    He tried to be a White Nationalist but when we wouldn’t accept Christianity he bailed out on us. He’s really a very intolerant person who wants it his way or no way.

  30. maurice on November 17th, 2008 4:05 am

    “intolerance” is normal, especially against perverts and followers of false and harmful religions.

  31. Stu Gavin on November 17th, 2008 4:43 am

    Believing that Jesus is coming back is a false religion.

  32. Allan Hampton on November 17th, 2008 9:51 am

    The Constitution means what We, the People, say it means. The People are the highest political power in Constitutional America. However, the People’s political power applies only when they serve on a Citizen Jury and Hire (elect) Lawmakers (specifically Congressmen every two years). Ranting, raving, and other protest of the People have no political power at all.

    Christ or any other God cannot hire (elect) any USA Official or serve on a USA Jury, only a flesh and blood USA Citizen can do either and both.

    Peter is doing a very good job of explaining why America is in a cesspool of corruption but evidently has not figured how to get out of it, constitutionally, therefore correctly.

    Allan

  33. The Jew is the disease on November 17th, 2008 10:13 am

    Listening to some asshole that doesn’t listen to you is a waste of time. Grow a brain and move on. And shank is a waste of time. He has most of the situation figured out, but can’t really “get it” because of his John Hagee-colored lenses.

  34. Allan Hampton on November 17th, 2008 10:49 am

    “but can’t really “get it””

    Oh yeah, he gets it alright but doesn’t get what to do about it.

    What do you suggest “Americans” do about it?

    Christianity is a disease too but Americans are free to accept that disease if the wish; the problem arises when Christians mistakenly think Christ will correct government.

    Allan

  35. 2eyedJack on November 17th, 2008 11:39 am

    To New America:

    Are your Peter’s press secretary?

    Strange that the man can’t speak for himself.

    Anyway, the majority of your dissection evades the points that I offered.

    End of subject.

  36. New America on November 17th, 2008 3:48 pm

    in reply to Alan Hampton:

    you wrote:

    “but can’t really “get it””

    Oh yeah, he gets it alright but doesn’t get what to do about it.

    What do you suggest “Americans” do about it?

    Christianity is a disease too but Americans are free to accept that disease if the wish; the problem arises when Christians mistakenly think Christ will correct government.

    Allan

    in reply:
    To quote VNN’s Alex Linder, “It’s the damndest thing I have ever seen in my life. The best Idea in the world, and the biggest gang of idiots out there representing it.”

    Good point.

    By attacking Christianity – and Christians – in THIS country, we do explicitly what the Jews do implicitly.

    And, you may rest assured, people who practice THAT particular type of preaching will never achieve political power in America, or, for that matter, in ANY Western nation.

    As well, we cut ourselves off from the living spiritual foundation of Western Civilization.

    And, for all of those who blindly worship the Constitution, in whatever Form it currently takes. remember this:

    “The Constitution means what WE say it means.”

    Those were the words of the Zionist, Justice Brandeis, calmly defining the Revolution of 1933.

    So, if you wish to be the blind slave of a Zionist’s philosophy, that’s fine.

    Remember this – from a Racial perspective, WE Created the Constitution to serve OUR needs.

    And. when it can’t do that any longer, we will Create a new Constitution, fit for a New Nation, a White, Western Nation.

    And THIS one will follow Covington’s Northwest Republic Analytical Model, and be explicitly based on RACE.

  37. Allan Hampton on November 17th, 2008 5:26 pm

    “we will Create a new Constitution”

    Wonderful!

    Then who will enforce that new Constitution and how (by what means)?

    Allan

  38. Z.O.G. on November 17th, 2008 6:30 pm

    Stu Gavin said, “Everyone is asking what happened with Schaenk? Isn’t it obvious? He tried to be a White Nationalist but when we wouldn’t accept Christianity he bailed out on us. He’s really a very intolerant person who wants it his way or no way.”

    **********EXACTLY**********

  39. New America on November 17th, 2008 6:49 pm

    in reply to Allan Hampton:

    you wrote, quoting me:

    “we will Create a new Constitution”

    you then wrote:

    Wonderful!

    Then who will enforce that new Constitution and how (by what means)?

    Allan

    in reply:
    Remember, our ORIGINAL Constitution did not have an enforcement mechanism for the Supreme Court. Then, they relied upon the Executive for enforcement, and now, the rely upon a docile, transformed populace, with the Executive being pro forma, at best.

    Remember, the American states, PARTICULARLY in tthe South, were feudal societies, little kingdoms where the Governors could appoint who they chose to the Senate.

    This was entirely consistent with the prevailing socioeconomic model in place that that time.

    For what we might move forward to, I’d advise one and all to look at Covington’s Model Constitution for the Northwest Republic.

    It’s on his blog at http://downwithjugears.blogspot.com/

    He welcomes informed comment and criticism.

    Now Is The Time.

  40. New America on November 17th, 2008 6:50 pm

    in reply to Allan Hampton:

    you wrote, quoting me:

    “we will Create a new Constitution”

    you then wrote:

    Wonderful!

    Then who will enforce that new Constitution and how (by what means)?

    Allan

    in reply:
    Remember, our ORIGINAL Constitution did not have an enforcement mechanism for the Supreme Court. Then, they relied upon the Executive for enforcement, and now, the rely upon a docile, transformed populace, with the Executive being pro forma, at best.

    Remember, the American states, PARTICULARLY in tthe South, were feudal societies, little kingdoms where the Governors could appoint who they chose to the Senate.

    This was entirely consistent with the prevailing socioeconomic model in place that that time.

    For what we might move forward to, I’d advise one and all to look at Covington’s Model Constitution for the Northwest Republic.

    It’s on his blog at http://downwithjugears DOT blogspot DOT com/

    He welcomes informed comment and criticism.

    Now Is The Time.

  41. Z.O.G. on November 17th, 2008 7:49 pm

    Wow, that’s some really nice mental masturbation there, guys. Nice job. LOL

    You people do know that nothing will happen until there is an economic depression, don’t you? That is when the opportunity will come, not a minute sooner or a minute later.

    And, hey, I’ve got great news for you! That economic depression is already here. It’s in the beginning stages right now. Next year it gets a whole lot worse(2009).

    So stop wasting your time whining about the Constitution or how you can’t get elected into political office. You don’t have a chance in hell until there is 50% unemployment and tens of millions of Americans are starving to death because they can’t afford to buy food.

    Understand?

  42. New America on November 17th, 2008 8:37 pm

    in reply to Z.O.G.

    Your post is worth commenting on, because it encapsulates so much of what we have been doing wrong.

    I’d like to address the “why” of that, as well.

    you wrote:

    Wow, that’s some really nice mental masturbation there, guys. Nice job. LOL

    in reply:
    Criticism, of those who are trying to do better, by those, who can not do better, is par for the course, for this so-called “Movement.”

    you wrote:

    You people do know that nothing will happen until there is an economic depression, don’t you? That is when the opportunity will come, not a minute sooner or a minute later.

    And, hey, I’ve got great news for you! That economic depression is already here. It’s in the beginning stages right now. Next year it gets a whole lot worse(2009).

    in reply:
    And Dr. David Duke almost won STATE-wide office by…?

    Remember this – when the Republicans run of Race, the Republicans win.

    Anything else, and they lose.

    Period.

    you wrote:

    So stop wasting your time whining about the Constitution or how you can’t get elected into political office. You don’t have a chance in hell until there is 50% unemployment and tens of millions of Americans are starving to death because they can’t afford to buy food.

    Understand?

    in reply:
    The Constitution – all four of them, by my count – the Articles of Confederation, the Constitution until 1865, the Constitution until 1933, the Revolution of 1933 – reveals how the State chooses to incorporate, and what Forms that State chooses to use in its incorporation.

    That’s good for laying out the Rules of Governance at the State level, and, all States need such a formal declaration of incorporation.

    And, election into public office is only a step on the Path of proper Racial governance.

    Remember, Our Race Is Our Nation – and the skills we learn in running for (and, hopefully, attaining) political office will be the skills we will call into play when we organize our Nation along State lines.

    The problem is, you make the same error the classical WN Community has:

    (1) Wait for the torchlight parades.

    (2) Run to the front, and claim “Victory!”

    The actual process of governance requires developing the new State organically, from the Race/Nation, and THAT requires “Thinking Racially, and Acting Locally.:

    “Think Racial, Act Local.”

    In time, we can form the foundation of a Nation; in more time, the foundation of a State.

    But we MUST develop slowly, solidly, organically, even as we learned to walk and talk as children.

    With the infrastructure in place, we will be able to govern with skill, discipline and wisdom.

    Blind acceptance of the Constitution makes the mistake of accepting the Terms and Definitions chosen for us, in large part, by our Racial Enemies.

    We can – and MUST do better….

    While we can.

  43. maurice on November 18th, 2008 12:04 am

    Not Believing that Jesus is coming back is a false religion.

  44. Reck,Less:Abandon on November 18th, 2008 1:10 am

    I really don’t know where we would all be without Z.O.G.S. to enlighten us as to whats up,down,write,right or wrong or left.
    Thanks Dude… Reckon?

  45. Z.O.G. on November 18th, 2008 2:51 am

    You’re welcome, Reckless. Now, stay off the drugs!

    LOL

  46. Z.O.G. on November 18th, 2008 2:52 am

    Reckless, hey, man, don’t you remember what Nancy Reagan said, dude?

    JUST SAY “NO”!

    :-D

  47. Allan Hampton on November 18th, 2008 6:34 am

    “ORIGINAL Constitution did not have an enforcement mechanism”

    That’s pure constitutional idiocy – Article I, Section 2, clearly gives the People the Right and Power to Control the government via Hiring (electing) Lawmakers.

    Enough of your nonsense – get on with you, bye.

    Allan

  48. New America on November 18th, 2008 11:52 am

    in reply to Allan Hampton:

    you wrote, quoting me:

    “ORIGINAL Constitution did not have an enforcement mechanism”

    you replied:

    That’s pure constitutional idiocy – Article I, Section 2, clearly gives the People the Right and Power to Control the government via Hiring (electing) Lawmakers.

    Enough of your nonsense – get on with you, bye.

    Allan

    in reply:
    Note my comments in their proper, clearly defined context.

    Remember, our ORIGINAL Constitution did not have an enforcement mechanism for the Supreme Court. Then, they relied upon the Executive for enforcement, and now, the rely upon a docile, transformed populace, with the Executive being pro forma, at best.

    Note the BOLD terms, that place what I have said in its proper context.

    Then, as now, the Supreme Court did not have a defined enforcement mechanism in the Constitution.

    The reason, as I see it, was addressed. Let me make it clear, again – again, bearing in mind that the Constitution is simply the Articles of Incorporation for a new corporation, a corporate State.

    I continued:

    Remember, the American states, PARTICULARLY in the South, were feudal societies, little kingdoms where the Governors could appoint who they chose to the Senate.

    This was entirely consistent with the prevailing socioeconomic model in place that that time.

    in reply:
    Remember, the Founders had little, if any, faith in the American people. The franchise – voting – was open to land-owning men, and, and the Senate was political appointee.

    In short, no trust whatsoever in “The People,” per se; only the land owners, and those who controlled the greatest amount of land – governors of the “Sovereign” States – had the check and balance of an appointed Senate. Indeed, just in case “The People” got out of hand, ANOTHER check on “The People” was something called The Electoral College – and THEY control who becomes President.

    In short, the Founders would have looked at those who worship “The Constitution,” particularly as a tool for insuring the interests of “The People” are heard in Government as being fools.

    And they wold be right.

    Some further thoughts on our “COnstitutionalists” to follow.

    For now, note the positive Path that IS open to us:

    I wrote:

    For what we might move forward to, I’d advise one and all to look at Covington’s Model Constitution for the Northwest Republic.

    It’s on his blog at http://downwithjugears DOT blogspot DOT com/

    He welcomes informed comment and criticism.

    Now Is The Time.

    in reply:
    They Who Rule have Created at least FOUR different United States Constitutions, and probably a de facto Fifth Constitution – the PATRIOT Act, with Executive Orders/”Signing Statements” to replace the political checks and balances, and “Continuing Resolutions” to avoid the economic checks and balances of the Constitution.

    So good luck worshiping that piece of paper.

    Now, why the Covington Model works for us, and how it matters to the Patriotards/Libertariots.

    This blind worship of “THE Constitution,” in light of the fact that there have been at least FOUR different Constitutions, tells me that the Patriotards/Libertariots are singularly unwilling to take the responsibility to reject the worst of the past, to lay the foundation for the best of the future.

    An explicitly RACIAL future, based on a Positive Theory of Race, with the betterment of the Race explicitly defined as a primary organizing goal of the new society.

    So, by all means, the “Constitutionalists” can live in a Past that never really was, while avoiding their responsibility to make a better future.

    I feel pretty confident that TODAY, men like Jefferson and Hamilton would look to America, say these are the last days for America As We Knew It, and Start Over, investing their very lives in being the Living Foundation of the Northwest Republic.

  49. Yippy on November 19th, 2008 1:49 am

    “He tried to be a White Nationalist but when we wouldn’t accept Christianity he bailed out on us. He’s really a very intolerant person who wants it his way or no way.”

    I don’t think that’s the case at all. I think he just wanted a less intensive work schedule. A 5-day-a-week radio show is a major commitment.

    Also I don’t think you’re right in saying Nationalism, and White Nationalists inherently denounce Christianity. That’s a misrepresentation.

  50. New America on November 19th, 2008 2:30 am

    in reply to Yippy:

    you wrote:

    “He tried to be a White Nationalist but when we wouldn’t accept Christianity he bailed out on us. He’s really a very intolerant person who wants it his way or no way.”

    I don’t think that’s the case at all. I think he just wanted a less intensive work schedule. A 5-day-a-week radio show is a major commitment.

    Also I don’t think you’re right in saying Nationalism, and White Nationalists inherently denounce Christianity. That’s a misrepresentation.

    in reply:
    I agree with your basic points, and would like to elaborate on them.

    I think Peter recognized something that has taken me a long time to accept; White Nationalism is something that most White people reject at first glance, and do not give it a second glance.

    Hence, we are like Pierce – trying to reach one percent of our people; if we get to three percent, we can roll over the Forces of Judaism like a tidal wave.

    Yet, so many of those on the boards are either disinformers,or CONservatives who are still trapped in trying to CONserve a world, and a philosophy, that condemns us totally, and absolutely

    They don’t really support “the Constitution” so much as they support a wish for a kinder, gentler world where The Rules were clearly known and defined – something that is really only sustainable in the community level, if that.

    I see people who talk about the wonderful days of the Confederate States of America; yet, on average, the average White male lived lives of horrific poverty, while a small handful lived lives of comparative luxury.

    This was inherent in the CSA’s economic system, political system, and the CSA’s Constitution. A small Elite controlled everything, and they ran everything on a classical Colonist economic model.

    Yet, they wear their CSA uniforms, and sing “Dixie” at their gatherings.

    Most of the CONstitutionalists make the same mistake the late Dr. Sam Francis did – they identified with the political Form of one place, and one time, and got stuck there, easily manipulated by those who had a broader picture.

    Only towards the end did Dr. Francis realize the incredible power of Race as the wellspring of Civilization; and, remember, only one Race took Christianity and made something of it, and with it.

    So many of our counterparts lecture long and hard about IQ, Ability Differences, Cultural Achievement, and virtually ALL of them ignore the wellspring from which these come – Family, as the Foundation of Race, and Race, as the Living Bridge between Family and Culture.

    The sad fact remains – all other races want to live along what only the White Race Created, Sustained, and developed – Civilization.

    Simple as that.

    THAT is why Harold Covington’s Northwest Republic Analytical Model is the best hope we have for a framework that encourages the further development of our Race.

    And, as Covington is the first to admit, there is plenty of room for Christianity in his Northwest Republic.

    PS – dirty little secret of the CONstitutionalists: under the First Constitution, they would not have been allowed to vote. If they had, the (appointed) Senate would “moderate” their votes, and the Supreme Court would have had exactly as much enforcement power as the President would have felt like extending to them – if that.

    Most White Nationalists look to a past that never really was, in large part to avoid the responsibility they have to make a bette world, starting where they are.

    And, if the South rises again, it will do so with a Spanglish accent.

  51. MTFury on November 19th, 2008 2:00 pm

    You Americans make me laugh. The Jew loves the antiChristian white man. The only thing that the Jew has ever really feared – Christianity and the New Testament – and you jokers junk it. Why did the Jew put so much effort into destroying our culture, not just enslaving us? Christianity was purposefully taken apart piece by piece in the universities, and that has never been done by the jews to any other race or creed.

    White Nationalism will die within this generation, with it’s rejection of Christian Moral Order. After all men will believe anything if they don’t believe in God.

    Look around you.

  52. roscoe on November 19th, 2008 4:12 pm

    2+2 =white nationalism=judaicism=nigerianism=4 =Hitler was a Judaic

  53. New America on November 19th, 2008 7:42 pm

    modification of earlier reply to Yippy:

    I meant to write that I DISagree with your major points about Peter Schanek, for the reasons I stated.

    The further White Nationalism removes itself from Christianity, the more it becomes the plaything of the Jews.

    Simple as that.
    THAT is the issue that is always hit hardest on the White Nationalism boards; say one good thing about Christianity, and up will pop people calling Jesus a “dead Jew on a stick.”

    And we wonder why White Nationalism per se never seems to get off the ground.

    I don’t.

    Most White nationalists are really not “White (Western) Nationalist (Civilization).”

    They are, all too often, people who you would not want to be in a room with for any period of time, and, all too often, rightfully so.

    This ties in with an issue Briseis, who was formerly on VNN’s Free Talk Live radio show, when she noted the general lack of general (Adult Masculine) competence among so many of the young men she met at WN functions.

    There are reasons for that, but they are not very flattering.

    Thus, those of us who DO realize the importance of Christianity as it is, and as it may become, to Western Civilization, really do have moments when we look and say, “It can’t be this bad.”

    Well, it IS, but these are simply the opportunities to do better – MUCH better – for our Families, and our Race; in other words, for our grandparents and our grandchildren yet unborn.

    In doing so, the morbidly obese, alcoholic wearers of ununiform uniforms will be winnowed away from the rest of us, who will become the BEST of us.

  54. Z.O.G. on November 19th, 2008 9:02 pm

    Edgar Steel(“New America”),

    Christianity is nothing more than a political and social tool of the Jews.

    Deal with it. ;-)

  55. Z.O.G. on November 19th, 2008 9:06 pm

    Edgar Steele(“New America”),

    Your law school training really shows, because you can’t seem to say anything in fewer than 10,000 words. The attorney verbal diarrhea is REALLY annoying.

    ;-)

Bottom