Top

Peter Schaenk interviews E. Michael Jones (Mon. 9/22)

September 22, 2008

VoR radio host Peter Schaenk returns with a brand new show featuring an interview with E. Michael Jones, who discusses his most recent book, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit. Don’t miss this broadcast!

Go here for more information on E. Michael Jones.

2 hours 6 min.

Comments

37 Responses to “Peter Schaenk interviews E. Michael Jones (Mon. 9/22)”

  1. Scott on September 23rd, 2008 12:25 am

    Peter: This is an excellent interview and guest. He helped connect a lot of dots that needing connecting. I won’t spoil it, it’s an absolute must listen.

  2. K-Sensor on September 23rd, 2008 12:41 am

    Off topics… but I Noticed this Edward Bernays tribute. http://www.prmuseum.com/bernays/bernays_1915.html

  3. Howdy Doody on September 23rd, 2008 3:27 am

    Excellent!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

  4. K-Sensor on September 23rd, 2008 4:54 am

    sound if awfully distorted, as peter points out in the show.

  5. Mike Conner on September 23rd, 2008 4:39 pm

    There was some distortion in first few minutes of the show that was corrected relatively soon.

  6. Ethan on September 23rd, 2008 6:29 pm

    This question was addressed in passing:

    Is it easier for a government to control a population composed
    almost entirely of Aryans or one that is a mix of whites and muds?

    A mostly Aryan population will readily obey natural laws: laws
    against murder, rape, theft, etc. They will not be so willing
    to obey unnatural laws: laws against free speech, freedom of
    association, freedom of religion, free enterprise, etc.

    The situation is reversed for a mixed population; they are less
    likely to obey natural laws and more willing to accept unnatural
    laws that destroy freedom.

  7. Peter Schaenk on September 23rd, 2008 9:10 pm

    There was an issue with the Skype volume settings. Hopefully we can deal with the issue without the distortion in the future.

  8. Bill Blass on September 23rd, 2008 11:56 pm

    That was an excellent interview, Peter–possibly your best yet. I hope you can get E. Michael Jones on again in the future, in order to address his thoughts and (maybe even) predictions for the future of Europe and America. Even though he is not a “White Nationalist” he obviously has some Traditionalist sympathy for ethnic states in the Western/Christian tradition. I wish he would have addressed the issue of how Traditionalist Christians, Nationalist Conservatives, and White Nationalists might work together and tolerate each other’s differences in order to pursue our substantial common interests.

    Good job, and let’s try to get Jones on again!

  9. K-Sensor on September 24th, 2008 12:38 am

    The show was great. Thanking Michael Jones for appearing!

  10. K-Sensor on September 24th, 2008 12:40 am

    The bad sound was caused by the Amp amplifying something, be it a magnetic field coming through your microphone or a loose jack allowing signal to cross paths.

  11. K-Sensor on September 24th, 2008 1:08 am

    The only issue I had with the show was Michael’s lack to define Jews today as the Ashkenazi’s. Jesus warned us that the there are a people that call themselves Jews, but aren’t. He warned us about the end times, being a time of great deception.

    Peter you some times dismiss to categorising Jews other than being Jewish but there is weight in sub-types. A broad brush is a failure on the picture of an intelligent mind.

    You never fail to link gays with perversion. You should pull people up on the Jews being Ashkenazis. A people that adopted the dark mystery religion of the corrupt Pharisees.

  12. Roy on September 24th, 2008 9:10 am

    Jews and Jews who are not…………..

    Hoffman stated early in the interview that his thesis is that when the Jews rejected Jesus, the term or word “Jew” no longer meant or referred to “physical Jews”…….or blood lineage Jews. At that point in time, according to Hoffman, the word “Jew” then became a different meaning altogether. Which was “Jew” by religion.

    So……..I don’t believe Hoffman makes a distinction between Ashkenazai, or Sephardi etc., etc. According to Hoffman, a Jew is someone who believes in Judaism (or some form thereof).

    However……..I agree with K-Sensor that the rest of us should always make that distinction. I think it helps in educating others that when we speak of “Jews”, we really aren’t being anti-semetic, because they are not even Semitic peoples. This I have found the most powerful counter attack when being accused of being ‘anti-semetic’. My typical response is…….”actually I am pro-semetic because I support the Palestinian people.” “The Israelis are the ones who are ‘anti-semetic’.

    Peter probably didn’t correct Hoffman because he realized that to Hoffman…….it doesn’t matter. Hoffman does not see a distinction. To him a Jew is a Jew regarless of ethnic origin.

    That is my take on it anyway.

  13. maurice on September 24th, 2008 11:26 am

    Roy, the interview was not with Hoffman.

  14. Roy on September 24th, 2008 1:15 pm

    Maurice………….sorry. Clearly, but not obviously, I meant Michael Jones.

  15. Roy on September 24th, 2008 1:16 pm

    Jews and Jews who are not…………..

    Jones stated early in the interview that his thesis is that when the Jews rejected Jesus, the term or word “Jew” no longer meant or referred to “physical Jews”…….or blood lineage Jews. At that point in time, according to Jones, the word “Jew” then became a different meaning altogether. Which was “Jew” by religion.

    So……..I don’t believe Jones makes a distinction between Ashkenazai, or Sephardi etc., etc. According to Jones, a Jew is someone who believes in Judaism (or some form thereof).

    However……..I agree with K-Sensor that the rest of us should always make that distinction. I think it helps in educating others that when we speak of “Jews”, we really aren’t being anti-semetic, because they are not even Semitic peoples. This I have found the most powerful counter attack when being accused of being ‘anti-semetic’. My typical response is…….”actually I am pro-semetic because I support the Palestinian people.” “The Israelis are the ones who are ‘anti-semetic’.

    Peter probably didn’t correct Jones because he realized that to Jones…….it doesn’t matter. Jones does not see a distinction. To him a Jew is a Jew regarless of ethnic origin.

    That is my take on it anyway.

  16. Z.O.G. on September 24th, 2008 4:10 pm

    The problem with the Catholic/Christian point of view regarding Jews is that they see Jewish behavior as being fundamentally a religious problem. But this idea is false. Jewish behavior is fundamentally a racial and biological problem. Yes, the Jews’ religion exacerbates their behavior, but their behavior originates in their genetic code, not in their religion.

  17. Zelea on September 24th, 2008 4:41 pm

    Identity Christians would have no problem with the genetic theory of Jewish behavior as the “serpent seed” doctrine affirms Jews as the literal offspring of Satan.

  18. Zelea on September 24th, 2008 4:55 pm

    I believe that a synthesis of biological and societal factors make up the Jewish psyche, I see the hard determinism of pure genetic causation as overly simplistic. Sure, the Jew might have a certain pre-disposition to engage in certain activities, but it does not follow that these factors will arise naturally, that is without external events to elicit them.

  19. maurice on September 25th, 2008 5:52 am

    In CatholicVoice.co.uk, where you can find the “Plot Against The Church”, there is this text about Michael Hoffman’s new book “Judaism Discovered” that was banned from Amazon:
    “The ban imparts extraordinary kudos to Mr Hoffman’s 1102-page tome, particularly as so many other works libellously misrepresented as “antisemitic” continue to be sold by Amazon, including E. Michael Jones’ forthcoming book The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit And Its Impact on World History. Readers can obtain Judaism Discovered directly from Michael Hoffman’s website.”
    You think is interecting to inteview also Mr. Hoffman?

  20. maurice on September 25th, 2008 6:01 am

    I suggest also to interview the responsible of CatholicVoice.co.uk (webmaster@catholicvoice.co.uk) and ask about this interesting book, the “Plot Against The Church”.

    I think Mr. Jones could have elaborated more when Peter asked about influence of judaism in the Catholic Church – maybe the time was not enough…

    About Malachi Martin:
    angelqueen.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=192403#192403

  21. roscoe on September 25th, 2008 5:15 pm

    Maurice–thank you for AQ info on Martin. Do you have anything to do with the mauricepinay blogspot? There are so many websites that I don’t get there very often.

  22. maurice on September 25th, 2008 10:42 pm

    No. By the way also this site has a link to Michael Hoffman’s book “Judaism Discovered”.
    Somebody knows something about Mr. Hoffman and this book?

  23. maurice on September 25th, 2008 11:01 pm

    Mr. Hoffman present his book here:
    revisionisthistory.org/page1/page5/page5.html

    About the discussion of race above he says:

    Who is a Jew? What is the role of counterfeit Jews? If the counterfeit is predominant – as I believe it is – this fact opens a revolutionary vista on history, signifying that contemporary Talmudists and Zionists are descendants of people who were not in Palestine when Jesus was crucified. They are representatives of the ideology that crucified Christ, but in general, not the race. This fact in turn disarms the race-based antipathy of the opponents of Talmudists and Zionists, a racial animus upon which, ironically, the rabbis and the Israelis depend for the continued allegiance of their own am ha’aretz.

  24. roscoe on September 26th, 2008 12:18 am

    i have read a couple of Mr Hoffmans earlier books and they are very valuable. I am somewhat tired of reading about judaics at this point so I will probably pass on his latest.

    Some questions about his org though. He is ass with the v2er Mr Hiembichner who is accusing Card Rampolla of being a ‘secret occult mason and named in an “OTO Manifesto”‘. I have completly blown that accusation to bits and am not surprised that a v2 schismatic would cling to such a joke of an idea. Aside from the Card himself, this accusation is most important in that it attacks the character of Pius X, Cardinal Merry Del Val and Leo Xiii as they were all very close to Rampolla.

    Another thing I am tired of is Khazars–they are just another part of the SOS

    RevHist also has reproached the Challoner version of the Bible( the same thing done by todayscatholicworld) If you are aware of a condemnation of same from any pre v2 Church authority please advise– I am not.

    Lets hope Mr Hoffman is not a Marrano.

  25. Peter Schaenk on September 26th, 2008 3:27 am

    RE Mr Hoffman:

    I have sent him numerous invites and he has declined them all. Obviously, he doesn’t see the importance of publicity, or discussing the cenorship of his book by Amazon.

    Maybe he didn’t like the EMJ interview?

    Isn’t Hoffman Jewish?

  26. Peter Schaenk on September 26th, 2008 3:45 am

    Re Ashkenazi vs Sephardi:

    They are both Jewish and believe in the Kabbalah and Tikkun Olam.

    Your “multiracial / egalitarian” brainwashed mind refuses to allow you to believe that “ALL” of these Jews are fighting for the same thing.

    So you split hairs by claiming Ashkenazi are bad and Sephardi good, when in reality, they believe in the same thing…

    The destruction of civilization as we know it, so they may rebuild it in the Jewish image.

    This is a Patriotard line, as heard on the Rick Adams show and it’s a fraudulent mind set used to confuse the listening audience.

    How many layers of labels can we come up with so the listening audience doesn’t get offended and the few “initiated” listeners will be appeased by our discussion of “Jews”, thus maintaining our Patriotard credibility.

    Ashkenazi, Canaanite, Sephardi, neo-con, liberal, socialist, Marxist, Communist, Illumminati, Mason, Reptilian people, shape shifters, etc.

    How would the average guy understand what the hell these broadcasters on Patriotard radio are talking about with so many labels and subgroups?

    What EMJ and Peter Schaenk are trying to illustrate, is the continuity of the Jews and their revolutionary tradition. You can put any label you want on their many front groups, but when you strip away the facade, it is the same people with the same goal…

    Tikkun Olam!

    Isn’t it time we started “SPEAKING ENGLISH”, so everyone can get on the same page?

  27. maurice on September 26th, 2008 3:49 am

    Maybe. Maybe a true “converso”. Who knows…

    Peter, could you try to interview the owner of CatholicVoice.co.uk (webmaster@catholicvoice.co.uk)?

    Regards,

    Maurice.

  28. maurice on September 26th, 2008 3:54 am

    And ask him why he have the link to Mooky…

    (at least he has a link to Missing Links, and has the only “Plot Against The Church” in internet, as I know)

  29. Peter Schaenk on September 26th, 2008 3:56 am

    Thanks for the suggestion. Please feel free to email me @

    shanktalk@yahoo.com

    with any requests for guests or suggestions.

  30. Rob on September 26th, 2008 9:27 pm

    Superb post by Mark and excellent points-Another white man in whom the light of reason resists the encroaching barren desert of semitic blind faith and mysticism! I’m still trying to digest EMJ’s point on Wagner. That somehow Wagner bears the burden of our current cultural demise because of hints of the anticipation of 20th century atonality in Tristan and Isolde? A very tenuous and subjective interpretation at best. Personally I think it’s downright half-baked.

  31. roscoe on September 27th, 2008 12:08 am

    Mark–what you fail to understand here is conspiracy. In that world the infamous Hegelian Dialectic rules( and has ever since 1789)

    Just because the Krauts were the good guys in the War doesn’t mean that their side wasn’t part of the set up– Hitler was just a Kerry or Dole who was meant to play Sonny Liston. In vain does one attempt to comprehend his philosophy or reasoning because the guy was a lunatic– a Manchurian Candidate wind up toy as Mookie( who is occasionally correct ) calls him. In that sense, Nazi’s did create Judaic power.

    My main problem with EMJones( and Shankus as well) is the failure to distiguish between the actual Vaican Conciliar Church and the present v2 apostate anti-christ schismatical sect.

    Maurice –I am about to read Plot Against Church by Pinay for the 4th time.
    I am not tired of reading about how the Catholic Church has been the main opposition to anti-christ Judaic occupation of the world–just those works that fail to take that into account. This is my feeling about Hoffman– maybe his new work is better in this respect–but 1000 pgs???? Let us know if you read it.

  32. Z.O.G. on September 27th, 2008 12:22 am

    Peter,

    Hoffman is a Jew. That’s why he won’t agree to come on your show. He hates White Nationalists and anybody associated with them.

  33. roscoe on September 27th, 2008 1:08 am

    This is why Kertzers books are important as even though he is a judaic, The theme is that the Catholic Church has been the adversary of Judaics. You obstinate morons( you know who you are) that are continually trying to confound Holy Church with judaics are headed for Big Trouble.

    Popes Against The Judaics

    Prisoner Of The Vatican

  34. Wolf on September 27th, 2008 3:01 am

    I get how soft, complacent and secularized White Europeans are susceptible to demonic Jew influence through their demoralizing media lies and cynical cultural subversion, but what excuse does the infallible universal church have? What excuse does the inheritor of the throne of St. Peter have?

    No excuse!

    At least Germany of the 1930′s and 40′s violently resisted the dirty yids and raised hell.

  35. roscoe on September 27th, 2008 1:30 pm

    The Roman Catholic Church is not a secular military power. It is true that there were sympathetic relations(concordats) with Germany and Italy in the 1930′s.

    Pius XII was aware at the end of his life that he had sold out the Axis powers and was partial to Communists during the war. He regretted this and asked others to pray for his soul

    If he repented, I guess he deserves to be called a true Pope. The Church Militant is really history by the time of the death of Pius XI in 1939

    A good read on the subjest is The Vatican and the War by Cianfarra

  36. Tim in Fla on October 12th, 2008 9:34 pm

    Peter,
    Thanks for the great interview. Mr. Jones is brilliant , and I find him a more engaging guest than some other sympathetic intellectuals/authors ( for example Dr. MacDonald). I am not religious, but take no exception to his or your beliefs;rather I find other’s Faith and commitment to belief admirable.

  37. John on October 29th, 2009 3:35 pm

    This interview was very enlightening. Mr. Jones was great. I learned a lot. Thank you!

Bottom