Top

Peter Schaenk 7/24/08 Paint it Black

July 25, 2008

PAINT IT BLACK

In this program Peter discusses:
.

  • Whether it’s Jewish involvement in the Russian Mafia, Russian Revolution, White and Black slave trade or the crucifixion of Christ, there is a concerted effort to “Black Out” any trace of the Jewish hand print from the public record
  • MS 13 and illegal immigration
  • All the latest news and “This Day In History”

Comments

44 Responses to “Peter Schaenk 7/24/08 Paint it Black”

  1. K-Sensor on July 30th, 2008 2:43 am

    Obviously this missed the front page.

  2. Peter Schaenk on July 31st, 2008 5:13 am

    What did?

  3. K-Sensor on July 31st, 2008 6:39 am

    Well this show wasn’t up for notice until Mondays show has passed.

  4. Dark Forces on July 31st, 2008 11:51 am

    What does the Old Roman Catholic Order and the Jewish Kaballah have in common? These two forces move in tandum to destroy the white man and it has been so for over 2000 years. These two forces are two heads on the same snake.

  5. Zelea on July 31st, 2008 1:43 pm

    Dark Forces, what absolute garbage.

  6. roscoe on July 31st, 2008 3:17 pm

    Dark Forces is an obstinate heretic of some persuasion or another.

  7. roscoe on July 31st, 2008 4:18 pm

    It’s probably just the katman up to his old tricks again.

  8. Peter Schaenk on July 31st, 2008 6:40 pm

    This is what I refer to as Nietzschean philosophy; Jews have used it with great effect.

    The idea of returning to our idyllic “Pagan” era, is nothing more than a return to Dionysian ritual and unrestrained barbarism.

    This is why World Zionism supported Hitler. This is why World Zionism supports any group that advocates a return to primitivism / paganism.

    Whether it is the “counter culture revolution” of the 1960′s or many WN’s groups, they advocate the same thing…A return to our pagan past.

    We saw the results with WW2 and the destruction of the most advanced country in the world…Germany.

    Western man has never fully recovered.

    If we are to lay blame on anyone, it would be with these groups that promote primitivism, secularism and moral relativity.

    Interestingly enough, Nietzsche’s ideas were made popular by Jews such as Freud and Edward Bernays.

  9. roscoe on July 31st, 2008 9:26 pm

    Shankus–Your emphasis on Western Civilisation is what caused me to listen to you on a regular basis. An understanding that Hitler was put in power by the judaics as part of Hegelian(or Nietzsian if you prefer) Dialectic is essential to comprehend and those who think Hitler was a good guy are lost . Hitler may have signed a concordat with Catholic Church but this was only to tear it up afterwards(like Napoleon and Mussolini) as part of the plot to destroy the Church. Philosophically Nietzsche was the foil to Marx and both sides are indeed Cabalistic.

    Lately you have gone back and forth as to whether America is part of Western Civilisation or not: it cannot be. Neither can the Amish, Mormons or any other group who live outside the infallible defined belief system of the Vatican I Roman Church.

    http://www.ewtn.com/library/COUNCILS/V1.HTM#4 and #6

    One problem seems to be that you seem to confound the v2 anti-church with the above infallibility. Please spend more time explaining how this cannot be. Remember it is the v2 anti-church that is throwing the mexicans into our face. The Mexicans are no different than other Protestants as they hav no idea that the v2 anti-church is in fact a satanic cult.

    Restore the V I Church and they would not even be comming up here.

    maurice—i don’t necessarily disagree with your idea of co-opting Orthodox and other alleged branches of Christianity in this situation. During the ‘reformation’ , Catholics and Lutherns would band together against Calvinists at times. That may work in Europe but here the only solution is to wake the mexicans up to how they are being manipulated by judaics. They would be our friends if they new their own history and I am by no means saying that they are not a problem.

    However to be fair it needs to be said that I have been living in LA for 30 yrs and have never been sick even 1 time by eating in a mex restaurant. And they are the cooks in all the other restaurants also. Even when I use to go to Jaurez while in the Army, I never was sick from eating or drinking there. This is of course just my own individual case.

  10. maurice on August 1st, 2008 12:49 am

    Sirs, you have some comments on this conversation with k-sensor? I have to say that Peter helps one to start thinking and using logic (although what is written below is disputable). The education we had not (the old Trivium – Grammar, Logic, Rethoric).

    [start]
    Sensor,
    we all are “racist” because it is natural. Racist meaning that we feel and perceive there are differences between races and we tend to favour our own – this is nature law.
    Blacks can participate in one’s dream, the problem, especially in USA, they were too much “socially engineered” and they see whites as enemies, and not a race and culture that is an example to be followed. This happened in the past and still we see in some countries where the control of the masses is not so developed.
    Regards,
    Maurice.

    K-Sensor on July 28th, 2008 11:09 am
    Maurice, I actually have never dreamt Blacks whilst asleep. I was wondering if others do the same. Do Blacks dream Black people in their dreams? Do Asians dream Asians in their dream scenarios?

    maurice on July 28th, 2008 11:18 am
    I’m sure they do but they can’t dream a scenario without Whites (or Western Civilization) with all things we brought. Social engineers say we brought only wars and persecutions and bla-bla-bla…
    But which scenario is possible without all institutions, laws (including natural law), moral guidance, art, science, etc. that comes from Western Civilization?
    [end]

  11. Zelea on August 1st, 2008 4:15 am

    “Perhaps the most notorious and infamous misrepresentation of Hitler’s beliefs is that which comes of connecting Hitler and Nietzsche because of a photo-op of Adolf Hitler visiting the Nietzsche archive. Many have used this photo and have incorrectly believed or claimed that Hitler visited the archive on his own volition, and out of great admiration for Nietzsche. This simply is not the facts of the matter. The photo-op idea and event came from Nietzsche’s sister, Elisabeth Förster, a wealthy Nazi supporter, who established the Nietzsche Archive in 1933. It was this woman who invited Hitler, who after much persuasion visited the archive for publicity purposes. It is important to note that Hitler visited the archive exactly once and then only for political purposes to appease and maintain the support of Nietzsche’s anti-Semite sister and other followers of Nietzsche’s philosophy. The staged publicity event appeared in the German newspapers and William Shirer (The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich) briefly mentioned the event making it sound as if Hitler often visited the archive because he admired Nietzsche. This was misinformation and Shirer probably got his “information” from the German news article rather than from the facts of the actual event. Several scholars have criticized Shirer for his serious lack of scholarship and poor source material. Elisabeth Förster for her own purposes also misrepresented Nietzsche by making her brother look like an “anti-Semite” and a proto-Nazi when in fact Nietzsche’s philosophy had little resemblance to the National Socialist German Workers’ Party or the Nazi Party agenda. Unfortunately for the folk many Germans and other Europeans fell for the Nietzsche-Nazi connection including many members of the Thule society. Neo-Nazis have followed that delusion in sizable numbers, thereby harming their work.”
    - Col. Joe Johnson

  12. Bob in DC on August 1st, 2008 12:40 pm

    Roscoe,

    What is your opinion of Richard John Neuhaus?

    Bob

  13. roscoe on August 1st, 2008 1:20 pm

    I am not familiar wih Neuhaus. And Shirer, like Nietzche was a judaic. .

  14. Z.O.G. on August 1st, 2008 3:02 pm

    roscoe,

    The argument that Hitler and National Socialism were put in to place by “the Jews” as some sort of Hegelian dialectical foil against the VERY Jewish Communism/Bolshevism of the Soviet Union is a standard Conspiritard line used by scumbag Jew protecting liars like Alex Jones and all the other Patriotard broadcasters.

    Quite frankly I am surprised to see this ridiculous line of reasoning repeated on this board and even by PETER SCHAENK HIMSELF. I think you guys need to take your heads out of your collective asses and wake up. :-)

  15. roscoe on August 1st, 2008 4:07 pm

    Hitler was a judaic……….

  16. Z.O.G. on August 1st, 2008 8:55 pm

    You keep saying “Hitler was a Judaic” without any supporting evidence with which to substantiate your claim.

    It’s total bullshit, and you know it.

  17. Z.O.G. on August 1st, 2008 9:01 pm

    Oh, by the way, for those of you who don’t know, the claim that “Hitler was a Jew” is frequently used by the fringe Patriotard/Conspiritard people. Keep in mind that this is the same crowd who claims that “Rich White Nazis” run the world, and that Jews have nothing to do with anything whatsoever. LOL

    Need I say any more? :-)

  18. roscoe on August 1st, 2008 9:34 pm

    ZOG is a judaic. The claim that Herr Hitler was a judaic is a topic that has been covered for years on the old Shankradio Forum and in this VOR comment section. The evidence has been given over and over. First of all:—TAKE A LOOK AT HIM!!!!!!!

  19. roscoe on August 1st, 2008 9:37 pm

    If the ‘frindge/Patriotard/Conspiratard people’ think that ‘Rich White Nazis’ run the world it would seem to me that they would call Hitler a ‘Rich White Nazi’–not a judaic.

  20. roscoe on August 1st, 2008 10:05 pm

    Another strange ‘Nazi’ who is a judaic is Bill White–Not surprisingly, Daryl Lamont Jenkins cannot figure this out.

  21. Wolf on August 1st, 2008 11:01 pm

    I find it extremely suspicious when someone uses the term “judaic” when referring to a “jew”, “kike’ and or “yid”.

  22. roscoe on August 1st, 2008 11:17 pm

    The boy who cried wolf has never apologised for his most blasphemous attack on the Roman Pope which I will not dare repeat. He has also repeatedly accused the v2 anti-church of somehow being the Catholic Church. This is a pattern of deception whatever your true racial heretage.

  23. David Holloway on August 1st, 2008 11:24 pm

    Schaenk is a patriotard, he’s just bitterly jealous of Alex Jones who is far more popular than he will ever be. Peter oozes jealously of Alex Jones and it is actually kind of pathetic to listen to.

  24. roscoe on August 1st, 2008 11:26 pm

    And I would remind those who care that he has also in the past represented himself as –you guessed it: another Nazi as well as a hippy.

  25. roscoe on August 1st, 2008 11:27 pm

    the boy who cried wolf that is.

  26. David Holloway on August 1st, 2008 11:27 pm

    Catholicism is an enemy of the White race, they have converted more minorities to Christianity than any other branch of the Christian faith.

  27. Wolf on August 1st, 2008 11:32 pm

    For all I know, every Catholic pope, since I’ve been alive at least, has been a secret Jew. So no, an apology is not forthcoming. Furthermore, the previous poster is shedding crocodile tears, he’s much more bent out of shape over my comments about the obscure heritage of one Ringo Starkey.

  28. roscoe on August 1st, 2008 11:35 pm

    ‘When you attack the Catholic Church, you are doing the work of the Judaic’–Peter Schaenk

    There is only one minority on this Earth and it is the white race. And as far as converting other races that is correct. It is much better to have another race your friend as oppossed to an enemy. This by no means implys forced race mixing.

  29. roscoe on August 1st, 2008 11:45 pm

    Your original blasphemous remark should have read f the ANTI-POPE and I wouldn’t have noticed. The way you phrased it was taken to mean the Catholic Church as a whole.

  30. Z.O.G. on August 2nd, 2008 2:42 am

    ‘roscoe’ is a judaic.

    LOL :-)

  31. maurice on August 2nd, 2008 11:08 am

    Just to remind you Protestants:

    Protestantism is more in line with judaism and so is normal protestants attacks Catholicism, the true enemy of talmudic-judaism:

    “Masonry and Protestantism are essentially revolutionary movements as they are for the overthrow of Catholic teaching. The Church opposes revolution of all forms. Therefore the Church can not be for those elements in Vatican II as they are or have been interpreted which attempts to synthesize Masonic principles (such as liberty, equaility and fraternity) and Protestant principles (favoring non dogmatic, protestantized teaching and liturgy, democratizing in “collegial” terms and the overthrow of papal supremacy). Catholic Popes however are against revolution, sedition and the overthrow of authority. Masonry has its roots foremost in Judaism and the Protestant revolt and what they both have in common is a hatred of Catholic dogma and the papacy.”
    Kathy Willett Redle.

    Compiled by: Kathleen Willett Redle

    Mystical “idea of a Chosen Race,” G.Chesterton (research done by Dr. Robert Hickson on Chesterton’s quotes) writes:
    “But among the thousand and one ways in which Semitism affected Germanism is in this mystical idea, which came through Protestantism [originally a kind of “Old Testament Christianity,” as often noted]. Here the Nordic Men, who are never thinkers, were entirely at the mercy of the Jews, who are always thinkers. When the Reformation had rent away the more Nordic sort of German from the old idea of human fellowship in a Faith [the Catholic Faith] open to all, they obviously needed some other idea that would at least look equally large and towering and transcendental. They began to get it through the passionate devotion of historical Protestants to the Old Testament. G.K. Chesteron, The End of the Armistice (New York: Sheed and Ward, 1940) p. 95

    Chesterton wrote: “By concentrating on the ancient story of the
    Covenant with Israel, and losing the counterweight of the ideal of the universal Church of Christendom, they [the Protestants, especially the “Prussianized” or “Hitlerized” Protestants] grew more and more into the mood of seeing their religion as a mystical religion of Race. And then, by the same modern processes, their education fell into the hands of the Jews.” Ibid., p. 96

    Chesterton stated, “There are Jewish mystics and Jewish sceptics; but about this one matter of the strange sacredness of his own race, almost every Jewish sceptic is a Jewish mystic. When they insinuated their ideals into German culture, they doubtless very often acted, not only as sceptics, but as cynics. But, even if they were only pretending to be mystics, they could only pretend to understand one kind of mysticism. Thus, German mysticism became more and more like Jewish mysticism.” Ibid.

    Chesterton says:
    But it is true that it all began with the power of the Jews; which has
    how ended with the persecution of the Jews. People like the Hitlerites never had any ideas of their own; they got THIS idea indirectly through the Protestants, that is primarily through the Prussians, but they got it originally from the Jews. In the Jews it [“the grand, imperial idea of a Chosen Race” or “mystical religion of Race”] has even a certain tragic grandeur; as of men separated and sealed and waiting for a unique destiny. But until we have utterly destroyed it among Christians [hence, especially among Judaized or Zionized Christians], we shall never restore Christendom.” Ibid., p. 97

    Karl Marx 1818 – 1883 converted from Judaism to the Protestant religion at an early age but as a young student who claimed to be an atheist but was most likely a Satanist. In his earlier writings The Union of the Faithful with Christ he said, “ Through Love of Christ we turn our hearts a the same time toward our brethren who are inwardly bound to us and for whom He gave Himself in sacrifice. Union with Christ could give an inner elevation, comfort in sorrow, calm trust, and a heart susceptible to human love, to everything noble and great, not for the sake of ambition and glory, but only for the sake of Christ.” Richard Wurmbrand, Marx and Satan (Westchester: Crossway Books, 1986), p. 11

    The 33° Freemason Yves Marsaudon wrote in plain terms:
    “With the Protestant churches there is no problem wanting to be solved, no more than there is any problem between Masonry and the Synagogue. The difficulties exist only with the Roman Church alone.”

    Masons are very happy with protestantism as the first step to religious syncretism. One Masonic magazine Latimia, of Germany stated, “Protestantism is half Masonry” and Eugene Sue said, “ The best way to de-Christianize Europe is to Protestantize it” and the Mason E. Quinet states: “In order to put an end to all religion, I have here two roads which open before you: you can attack at the same time Catholicism and all the religions on earth, especially the Christian sects; in this case you have opposing you, all the universe. On the contrary, you can arm yourselves with all those who are opposed to Catholicism, especially with the Christian sects who war against it: gathering the force of the impulse of the French Revolution, you can put Catholicism in the greatest danger that it has ever undergone. This is why I address myself to all creeds, to all religions which have combated Rome. They are all, whether they desire it or not, in our ranks since, the foundation of their existence is irreconcilable with the domination of Rome as much as ours is.” “The Mystery of Freemsonry Unveiled by Cardinal Jose Mara Caro y Rodriquez
    (Christian book Club of America, 1998) p.192

    Anthony Fraser wrote, “The convert from Judaism, Judith Cabaud, has asserted that the new liturgists ‘wanted to bring mass into line with Protestant reforms but also into line with modern Judaism.’

    Bernard Lazare went on to point out the role played by Jews in Protestantism:
    “The Reformation in Germany as well as in England was one of those movements when Christianity acquired new force in Jewish sources. The Jewish spirit triumphed with Protestantism.”

    In his book Les Juifs et le Monde Actuel, J. Madaule shows how Luther, at the beginning of the Reformation, at first defended the Jews, but was not long in changing his attitude towards them, for, as he says:
    “It was not the Jews who were becoming Protestants but the
    Protestants who were becoming judaised.”
    (J. Madaule, ibid., p. 171)

    Karl Marx went even further and said:
    “The Jew emancipated himself in Jewish fashion, not only by making himself master of the money-market but because owing to him and through him money has become a world power, and the practical Jewish spirit has been adopted by the Christian peoples. The Jews set themselves free in proportion as the Christians be came Jews.
    “Thus they contributed considerably to making money the
    means, the measure and the end of all human activity.”
    (Quoted in Salluste:
    Les Origines Secrites du Bolchevisme, p. 285)

    Heine (Jewish writer) remarks: “Are not the Protestant Scots Hebrews with their Biblical names, their Jerusalem, their Pharisaic cant? And is not their religion a Judaism which allows you to eat pork?”—(Qiioted by Louis I. Newman in Jewish Influence on Christian Reform Movements, p.633, in note.) Disraeli (Jewish Prime Minister of England and “ convert “ to Protestantism) is credited with the saying that Protestantism is Judaism with a licence to eat pork.”

    Makes you think, no?

    To you new “katmans” – who is the 5th column? Now that Peter is showing that America is based on a big jew lie you are getting really mad, no?

    this forum is full of anti-Catholic agents – of course: the Roman Catholic Church was the real enemy of the anti-Christ Talmudic-Judaism (not now, after Vatican II, unfortunately…)

    all protestant sects are judaic invention

    the rest are pagans that remain in this condition due to judaic influence

    “This is how Jews are so successful at infiltrating and destroying websites. They post meaningless attacks and other members start calling them names and it goes on for days….
    Instead of discussing topics of importance we have to endure the members attacking each other using profanity upon profanity.
    The net result: We stop discussing important news items and topics that should be front and center. ” – Skankus Maximus

  32. roscoe on August 2nd, 2008 1:25 pm

    Amen!!!!

  33. Peter Schaenk on August 2nd, 2008 6:13 pm

    We must have trolls in our midst, or you guys don’t listen very well to the broadcasts and the facts presented.

    I never said Hitler was put into power by Jews. I said Hitler was financed and supported by World Zionism. If you want to debate this fact, then by all means do so.

    But instead, you attack the messenger without investigating the message.

    So you are either misleading people on this thread with your nonsense purposely, or you are unable to process simple facts using logic and reason.

    Just to make it simple:

    Hitler was financed by Jews. Why?

    PS

    We don’t allow profanity on this site, so your post will be deleted.
    Please try to phrase your posts without profanity in the future.

    Thanks.

  34. Peter Schaenk on August 2nd, 2008 6:17 pm

    Mr. Holloway,

    Re your statement that I am a “Patriotard”, please elaborate, so we all know what evidence you have to back this up.

  35. maurice on August 2nd, 2008 8:03 pm

    Remember ye be men, not senseless beasts;

    Nor let the Jew, who dwelleth in your streets,

    Hold you in mockery. Be not, as the lamb,

    That, fickle wanton, leaves its mother’s milk,

    To dally with itself in idle play.”

    Paradise by Dante Alighieri

  36. roscoe on August 2nd, 2008 10:10 pm

    What is the difference between saying that Hitler was put in power by judaics and that he was financed and supported by world Zionistas?

  37. Z.O.G. on August 2nd, 2008 10:13 pm

    Someone present some evidence that Hitler and the National Socialists were “financed” by “the Jews” except for the some chump change that they MAY have given to him early in his political career in an attempt to control him(the Jews try this on all politicians and political parties).

    Still waiting…

  38. Z.O.G. on August 2nd, 2008 10:16 pm

    And the fact that the Zionists shared the same goal as the National Socialists in getting the Jews out of Europe and into Palestine doesn’t count as “financing” Hitler and putting the National Socialists into power.

    Sorry, you guys will have to do better than that.

  39. roscoe on August 2nd, 2008 11:19 pm

    Judaics controlled the entire money supply of the world by 1914. There is NO WAY Hitler could have come into power without their support. There is your evidence; it goes well with the co-operation between the two in the exodus of Judaics from Europe.

    There were good people on the Axis side no doubt just like the good guys in the civil were rebels but even then both sides were hegelian.

    It seems ZOG doesn’t understand that there is an anti-christ conspiracy near ftuition.

  40. roscoe on August 2nd, 2008 11:37 pm

    In passing I heard DBS and Carrington H saying that the Vatican finances have been controlled by Judaics since 1820 or so–this is not exactly correct.

    Since the Fr Rev Judaics controlled almost all the capital of Europe. It did happen that Greg XVI was forced a couple of times to borrow money from Rothschild. No one else would lend him money as they were probably intimdated in some way. I believe even Pius IX was forced to take a loan once also.

    Apparently when the Pius lost his Temporal dominions, he had no need any longer for their money. I believe the Pope actually defaulted on the Rothschild loan when he was ‘Prisoner Of The Vatican’ after beig dispossessed of his States and ‘thrown out’ of Rome.

    It seems likely that after 1914 or so(death of Pius X and Card Rampolla) Judaics became more influential in Vatican finacial affairs.

  41. roscoe on August 2nd, 2008 11:40 pm

    The first Greg XVI loan was about 1935

  42. roscoe on August 2nd, 2008 11:45 pm

    I highly doubt that Leo XIII or Pius X had any financial dealings with Rothscild; while the latter would probably consider himself their creditor.

  43. Z.O.G. on August 3rd, 2008 1:33 am

    Sorry, Roscoe P. Coltrain, but simplistic and naive generalizations such as “Jews controlled the world’s money supply by 1914″ are not evidence. You’ll have to do much better than that. Try again.

  44. Peter Schaenk on August 4th, 2008 3:42 am

    Paul Warburg was a director of American I.G. Farben and thus connected with the financing of Hitler. Max Warburg, a director of German I.G. Farben, signed — along with Hitler himself — the document which appointed Hjalmar Schacht to the Reichsbank.

    A second world war had been created by the Illuminati, with the help of the Rothschild/Morgan/Warburg/Schiff syndicate. After the end of the war, the Tribunals that investigated Nazi war criminals censored “any materials recording Western assistance to Hitler,” said historian Antony C. Sutton.

    Do your own Google search. There is plenty of info out there. “Wall Street” is often cited as financing Hitler. Who can deny with a straight face that Wall Street is not synonymous with World Zionism and the Rothschild family?

Bottom