Peter Schaenk 6/6/08 Hitler’s Brain Was Behind 9/11!

June 7, 2008


In this program Peter discusses:

  • The manufacturing of Obama as the Democrat’s choice for president and the reasons Hillary will not accept the VP nomination.
  • A listener’s email “proving” 911 was the work of Nazi’s, (George Bush and family), to get revenge on the U.S. for the German defeat in WW2 and the creation of a “1000 year Reich” in the Good Old U. S. of A.
  • Homosexual activist Frank Kameny who convinced the American Psychiatric Association to reclassify “homosexuality” as normal and not a perversion, is now saying “bestiality” is protected behavior under the U.S. Constitution.
  • All the latest news and “This Day In History”


32 Responses to “Peter Schaenk 6/6/08 Hitler’s Brain Was Behind 9/11!”

  1. Maurice on June 7th, 2008 1:15 am

    mp3 please…

  2. America First on June 7th, 2008 2:45 am

    Thank you for the link Peter.

    Tuned in Mikey Winnie Savage today for five minutes literally and he was screaming Hitler this and Hitler that and then put down Pat Buchannon.

  3. Mark Lavarre on June 7th, 2008 3:37 am

    I’ve heard a lot of Peter’s shows but this was by far the most informative and definitely most entertaining episode ever!! His response to the 9-11 letter of that brain damaged patriotard was hilarious!!

  4. K-Sensor on June 7th, 2008 8:04 am

    I can’t agree more with the understanding on Obama. Peter, this maybe your post-911 Alex Jones moment. This being properly foretold.

  5. K-Sensor on June 7th, 2008 9:46 am

    Peter, I think you’re taking the National Socialism on the face of their régime. Personally I would sway to that view but you can’t under estimate the mystery religion factor. People that are working in the background to destroy Christianity, the majority being so called Jews today. You can’t dismiss the Catholic factor either.

    Hitler did ban the Freemasons and other secret groups but that could have been a propaganda trick.

  6. K-Sensor on June 7th, 2008 11:11 am

    Peter I may step back a bit from what I said about agreeing with the Obama analysis. Yes you are very logical, but you maybe not taking everything into consideration. Like, we aren’t putting enough weight on the flip flop of the Hegelian dialect. Isn’t it the female’s turn of the dialect? Democrat’s will soothe the peoples restlessness over Bush period.

    Have you seen Mc Cain’s awful speech ;

  7. America First on June 7th, 2008 2:48 pm

    Sadly folks sheeple will vote for McNut traitor, as long as the enemy alien owned media regime continues to love him. McNut could wear under ware on head he is a the k choice.

  8. katman on June 7th, 2008 4:49 pm

    Ron Paul was on television on cspan saturday afternoon. it was a rebroadcast of a speech and question and answer session he had on friday, i guess in washington dc. he seems to be a nice man. but i do not think he understands the enemy that well or maybe he does and he hides it. anyway, he said that some jewish students came to visit him a while back and that they agreed with his viewpoints and he was glad. well to that i say, isn’t that special. heck i wonder if this man realizes the real reasons why his campaign never got off the ground and was imho, sabotaged from the outset by jews working on his staff. he is a fool to have jews anywhere near him at any time. they are the real enemy and i am surprised that he, after 17 years in washington dc doesn’t seem to have a complete grasp of the situation. also, why is it ron paul will not anywhere near 911? why is that? too scared to see the truth of the big picture? anyone that trusts the jews do not know the jews. that is all i can say about that. judging from this, one would have to suspect just how great he would be as president. a weakness of any size in this area, would be dangerous at best.

  9. roscoe on June 7th, 2008 4:54 pm

    Hitler(like Mussolini) was put in power by judaics to be part of the controlled opposition. Mussolini banned Masons also but only the Grand Orient and not the Scottish Rite. Hitler and Mussolini both signed concordats with the Vatican but(same same Napoleon) only did this to tie the Vatican to those phoney regimes; the concordats were laughed at by the nazis and facists afterwards.

    Possibly K-Sensor could explain what he means by ‘not forgeting the Catholic factor’. Keep in mind that St Ignatius was not a member of the ‘Alumbados’ nor were the first Jesuits judaics like Conigsby says.

    And BTW, there was zero gunpowder found under the Englisn Parliament in Nov 1605.

  10. Mark Lavarre on June 7th, 2008 7:59 pm

    roscoe, if Nazi Germany was controlled opposition then you don’t believe in Benjamin Freedman’s speech in which he said that the Jews of the world declared war on Germany in 1933?

  11. katman on June 7th, 2008 8:28 pm

    i have always found it interesting that the term ashkenazi and nazi have similar letters in them. which perhaps leads one to believe that this is no coincidence. the jews did declare war on germany but what exactly did this mean in real terms? the zionist wanted the jews to migrate to the land of palestine because they needed more warm jewish bodies in that area since they were outnumbered. during the world war one time frame, this area was controlled by turkey, which was itself controlled by the jews and had been for over a hundred years perhaps. so i am sure, they made damn sure the arabs were disarmed in that area, so that when the jews came into this area, they could do whatever it is they wanted. such as it was during and after world war 2. hilter assisted with the creation of the jewish state. one can say, well it was his way of dealing with the jewish question. well maybe. but the facts are this. hitler did help with its creation. there can be no denying it. the flag of the third reich and the star of david flew side by side in nazi germany. in order to fight, you have to have a enemy. the jews created a enemy for us to fight. so we had white germanic peoples fighting other germanic peoples and killing each other and to the jew, this was good in many respects. was hitler controlled opposition? who is to say at this point. i for one am not sure on this subject. as is the case when these men come to power, sometimes for whatever reason they do not do as they are told and this had to be the case when germany started printing its own money. i believe the reichstag fire was started by the communist jews. i believe krystalnacht was a jewish operation. jews dressed up as nazi brown shirts went around and started damaging jewish shops. this was done on purpose. the zionist wanted the jews to move to palestine. some did. many came here and many went to central and south america. was nazi germany controlled opposition? i would have to say so. afterall, who in this world has the money? money is power. nation rothchild said one time, he didn’t care who was king , as long as he had control of the nation’s money, it didn’t matter. hitler was just another creation and this creation may have finally woke up to the fact that this whole situation was bigger than himself , so he changed perhaps but his micromanaging of the war, was very destructiive to the war effort, especially his actions in appointing paulus to be in charge of the german 6th army at stalingrad. the germans should have won that battle but didn’t because paulus had no battlefied experience and so he made many costly errors. then we have the situation at normandy, when the germans panzer units were held in reserve by hitler because he thought this was not the main attack. on and on it goes. hitler had first class generals but his constant interference cost them greatly. frankly, sometimes i think he did that on purpose. but of course i am not sure of that, at least not at this time. oh by the way, there were many jews in the german general staff. there also were a lot of jews in the SS . strange stuff for people who supposedly hate jews and want to kill them all. controlled opposition?? that is a definte maybe for me……..we shall see what doctor roscoe says about it.

  12. roscoe on June 7th, 2008 9:44 pm

    Hitler did sabotauge(sp) the war effort– letting the British go free at Dunkirque is another example. Rhienhard Gehlen( there’s a name for you Paperclips) also helped set up the Germans for the Stalingrad disaster; in actuality Gehlen was a Communist double agent.

    It is the Communist Georgio Dimitriov who set the Riechstag fire according to K. Goff and he was later made Pres of Communist International.

    In Italian , the word national is spelled nazionale. In the most general terms, nazi just means a nationalist of some sort.

    katman and I have agreed on the Hitler was a double agent theme in the past–it is unfortunate that he has somehow convinced himself that Fernando and Isabella were also.

  13. katman on June 7th, 2008 9:55 pm

    you know roscoe, you are just like mark glenn. he gets pissy whenever i discuss the catholic church. the other day in the chatroom he tried to tell me the jesuit order was the good guys who had the job of finding and identifying the jewish double agents in the catholic church. i told him. well the guy that started the jesuit was jewish. does that mean anything? he said, no. he was a convert. oh gee, that makes sense. so i guess as long as a jew is a convert, you can trust him? oh boy. i am sorry. but i am not buying it roscoe……

  14. katman on June 7th, 2008 10:03 pm

    by the way roscoe, columbus was jewish and so was his entire crew. during this time in spain, it was the period of the inquisition. now we have been led to believe that somehow this was a terrible time when men were tortured. i am not sure on this. what do you think roscoe. were the jews persecuted in spain during this time? i mean afterall, even then, they had a lot of money. also they were well on their way to stealing whatever money anyone else had with their lending practices, which were designed to make the debtor fail. roscoe, what was columbus searching for? gold wasn’t it? jews love gold. they try to make it look bad in the markets , but secretly they want it because they know it is real money. columbus found some gold but then they couldn’t find anymore so he switched over to slaves…….perhaps this is when the jewish slavery business started in earnest…….columbus died a pauper. he was a useful idiot that was used and then discarded.

  15. LipSync on June 8th, 2008 12:21 am

    Peter, this show was what the doctor ordered! You needed to get angry at these patriotard morons.

    Your rant was powerful. It really called me into focus. It was so needed and straight to the point.

    Well done!


  16. roscoe on June 8th, 2008 2:21 pm

    Mr Glenn is correct when he says that the Jesuits were the enemy of the Marrano judaic 5th column within the Church in that St Ignatius was a partisan of the Inq. He is incorrect when he says that Loyola was a convert; his heritage was Basque Spaniard. The only one of the original 7 Jesuits who had judaic blood was Fr. Laynez who was i/2. There has never been any evidence that Fr, Laynez was a marrano. Fr Polanco joins later and there has never been any evidence that he was a Marrano either.

    Columbus was not a judaic and the statement that ‘his entire crew’ was judaics betrays the katmans nature as an obstinate heretic who follows the judaic Calvin(Cohen). Columbus was a Christian missionary of sorts who for the most part freed the the aboriginies of the Molech worshippers who had them enslaved.

    This is why it was so easy for the Spaniards and Ports to conquer the new world–the peasants here joined with them in the overthrow of the Aztecs and almost everyone lived happily ever after. At least until the Communist Revolution hit about 300 years later.

    Columbus did get stuck with a few judaics because they were ousted from Spain at about the same time as he sailed.

    Williiam Walsh–Isabella of Spain and Philip II

  17. roscoe on June 8th, 2008 2:24 pm

    The only reason I speak of Columbus a a Christian Missionary ‘of sorts’ is that he was not a priest.

  18. katman on June 8th, 2008 3:13 pm

    so roscoe , i suppose it would not be a stretch to say that you do not support any, of the 95 theses of martin luther?

  19. roscoe on June 8th, 2008 3:41 pm

    And with respect to Columbus enslaving( despite the Queen’s instructions) a few of the nigerian savages he found : he had no choice and we know from the Bible that some people are meant to be enslaved.

  20. katman on June 8th, 2008 4:48 pm

    hey roscoe what about the papal bull of 1455? you can make people slaves. isn’t this about the time that the spanish and portuguese jews started their slavery rackets? when we look at the first zionist congress in basal switzerland in 1897, theordore hertzl recommended that the jews go to uganda as their new homeland. perhaps one may say, well why would they do that since the place is full of africans. but what if it was not full of people? just how many blacks were taken to the americas during the days of slavery by the jews? perhaps for a while there, africa was just about out of people also columbus and his brothers were hip deep in the slave trade in the americas and they were not nice people, no matter what our history books tell us. he went looking for gold roscoe. he didn’t care about anything else. when the gold ran out, he started selling people. so much for the spread of God’s Word. columbus was a thug and a jew and he acted the part too. does this discussion make you want to rub on your worry beads roscoe?

  21. roscoe on June 8th, 2008 5:40 pm

    Not sure what you are getting at with the ref to 1455–Columbus(that great hero of Christian civilisation) did not begin until 1492.

    I remember posting in the old Shankradio Forum a couple of yrs ago the following. An article on my Yahoo news page said that a special committee has been set up in Genoa to settle once and for all the question whether Columbus was a judaic. I have heard nothing more to date but can assure eveyone that when the results are finally announced, Columbus will be found to be an Italian like he always was.

    And we should all be thankful for the gold that he found because it helped financed the counter-reformation in Europe enabling the Catholic Church to win back most Europeans to the true faith and foundation of Western Civilisation.

    If you want to look for the few Europeans who did participate in the slave trade look to the heretics Drake and Elizabeth primarily. Yes there were some Spanish and Ports who were not perfect but it was the exception rather than the rule.

  22. K-Sensor on June 8th, 2008 9:37 pm

    Lipsync I found it great too that Peter got reved up.

    Katman, Jordan Maxwell pointed out that there was a Nazi word use in the old corrupt Israelite off shoot sex religion.

  23. roscoe on June 9th, 2008 4:19 pm

    jordan Maxwell is a judaic

  24. katman on June 9th, 2008 5:31 pm

    the PHd. bruthas talk about admiral colon and slavery. there you go roscoe.

  25. katman on June 9th, 2008 5:45 pm

    King Ferdinand V , Queen Isabella, Diego de Raza-Grand Inquisitor after Torquemada, Hernando de Talavera-Isabella’s personal confessor (mother was converse), Pedro de la Caballeria and Alanso de Cabrera-(both converses)who helped arrange the wedding of Ferdinand and Isabella

    hey roscoe, this article says that the above people were jewish? comments?

  26. roscoe on June 9th, 2008 6:14 pm

    Who cares what the nigerians say about ‘slavery’–for the most part, they were better off as slaves than they were living in Afrika.

    I would advise all who are interested in this discussion to read Isabella of Spain and Philip II by Walsh.

    i have also recently come across another work which should be of interest to all. This is a book by EM Almedingen entitled So Dark A Stream–it is a bio of Paul I of Russia and his attempts to enforce the 1054 Council of Florence edict to reunite the Orthodox Church to Rome. Incidentally Pauls son Alex I tried to do the same thing later; botht were murdered.

  27. roscoe on June 9th, 2008 6:16 pm

    Katman–are you the same tinyurl moron who posts in Hal Turners comment area?

  28. roscoe on June 9th, 2008 6:20 pm

    And btw, Springmeier has the same backwards idea– that Isabella and Columus were involved in some sort of Knights Templar scheme to enslave the world. Never mind that the Templar order was surpressed in 1312 and has not existed in the Church since then.

  29. katman on June 9th, 2008 7:06 pm

    so we can say then that the jew, admiral colon was not in the business of spreading the good news about Jesus Christ, but instead was in the business of searching for gold, like any good jew would do. since he owed other jews money for his voyages while he purportedly was searching for a new route to india for the spice trade, he was looking real hard in the americas for gold and since he didn’t find any of any quantity, perhaps, he started bringing back indian natives and selling them to pay off his debts……and after all of the inidans were gone (and i do mean that literally) they came up with the idea to bring africans back to the islands to work on the jewish owned slave plantations. and then later on jewish owned slave ships brought africans to this country. matter of fact over 22M black slaves were brought to this country and only 2M made it… was almost depopulated before they finally stopped the slave trade or perhaps it still goes on, just not in the open as it did back when it was shall we say, legal….so your jew conversos roscoe were hip deep in all of this and to your little priest they said hail mary and to each other they said shalom……

  30. katman on June 9th, 2008 7:17 pm

    roscoe why is it everytime you say to go here or go there to read something it is always a catholic source? are there any other people on the web that have published relevant information , that are not catholic priest or researchers ?

    and no roscoe, i don’t post over at hal turner show dot com. i don’t hang around there frankly. there is nothing really to learn there of any importance except reading the discussions by a bunch of skin heads or redneck types with 80 percentile IQ levels. if you go there , then perhaps you feel at home there and then to that i would say, i am not the least bit surprised . Frankly I think you have smelled a tad too much jet fuel living over by LAX………

  31. roscoe on June 9th, 2008 9:22 pm

    I have never said I was a fan of Hal either, although it can be worth it to check his site once in a while just as it is useful to check with Sharpton or onepeoplesproject.

    Whatever benevolent slavery the Italian Columbus was forced to impose on his most rebellious aboriginies was for their own good.

    And no: WE can’t say that ‘Colon’ was not in the business of Christianity, but YOU can.

    Where do you get the idea that ‘perhaps’ Columbus started bringing back indian natives to Europe? Is this a dream of yours?

    And I was not aware that the indians were ‘gone’ literally? you are just posting jibberish and why are you so concerned about the nigerians anyway?

  32. roscoe on June 9th, 2008 9:38 pm

    And Springmeier is not a Catholic source nor is the book on Paul I by Almedingen that was referred to earlier so get your ducks in a row.